The Lemnian language was spoken by the inhabitants of Lemnos, an island in the northern Aegean, in the period before Attic Greek colonization. Lemnian is preserved on sixteen inscriptions dating to the second half of the 6th century bce. Most inscriptions are single words incised or painted on ceramic vessels.1 Inscriptions on stone monuments provide the bulk of the evidence for the language.
Lemnian inscriptions were written in an alphabet that had its roots in Phrygia, but several letters—theta, phi, and khi—were borrowed from Greek. Other accommodations were made in order to represent more faithfully the Lemnian sound system. The letters for voiced stops and for the vowel ypsilon were eliminated. Words in inscriptions were separated by punctuation in the form of a colon or a tri-colon ⋮. The direction of writing was typically left to right, but lines in longer inscriptions were frequently written in boustrophedon style.
The Stele of Kaminia
The stele is a tongue-shaped slab of local sandstone whose face was smoothed and cut with the profile of a warrior who wears a cap and is armed with a lance. He holds a large shield that covers his body. At least some of the bottom of the stele is missing, but how much is disputed. The stele bears two inscriptions. Inscription A is on the face and fills the space behind (a), above (b), and in front of (c) the head of the warrior. Inscription B is written in two parts, (a) and (b), on the stele’s right side. Inscriptions A and B were inscribed by different craftsmen. The letters theta, omicron, and phi have rounded forms in A, but quadrangular forms in B.
(1) Inscription A
(a) holaie⋮s ⋮ naφoθš ⋮ siasi :
(b) mara⋮s ⋮ mav
šialχvei⋮s ⋮ avi⋮s ⋮
evišθo ⋮ seronaiθ
(c) vanalašial ⋮ seronaiθ ⋮ morinail
aker : tarvasio
(2) Inscription B
(a) holaiesi : φokiašiale : seronaiθ : evišθo : toverona[
]rom : haralio : sivai : eptesio : arai : tis : φoke
(b) sivai : avis : šialχvis : marasm : avis : aomai
Although the inscriptions cannot be translated in their entirety, several phrases are intelligible, all of which point to funerary texts in honor of a Greek named Holaie Phokiaš (holaiesi: φokiašiale “for Holaie Phokiaš” [inscription B]). Holaie died at forty years of age (sivai: avis: šialχvis, “he lived for 40 years” [inscription B]) and held an official position referred to as maras (marasm: avis: aomai, “and he was maras for a year” [inscription B]).
The front of the base was incised with four words arrayed in two lines in boustrophedon writing.
(3) h(e)ktaonosi ⋮ heloke
soromš ⋮ aslaš
The meaning of the verb heloke can be deduced by comparison with Etruscan helu (“constructed”) and confirmed by context.4 Although the remaining words are of uncertain meaning, the structure of the inscription is clear and it may be translated provisionally as: “S. and A. made (this altar base) for H.” soromš and aslaš appear to be nominal forms, perhaps the names of the donors of the monument. h(e)ktaonosi is the beneficiary, the person for whom the base was constructed. It is highlighted by virtue of its placement in sentence-initial position.
Classification and Linguistic Features
Lemnian belongs to the group of languages that includes Etruscan and Raetic. The evidence for linguistic affiliation is primarily grammatical, for example, inflectional endings for nouns, -s, -ial (genitive case), -si, -iale (pertinentive case); and inflectional endings for verbs, -ke and -ai (past tense). There are also a few lexical correspondences with Etruscan, such as Lemnian avis (“year”), Etruscan avils (genitive case); Lemnian šialχvis (“forty”), Etruscan šealχls (genitive case); Lemnian enclitic conjunction -m (“and”), Etruscan enclitic -m, -um. The inventory of vowels and consonants in Lemnian matches that of Etruscan in almost all respects.5 More significantly, the Lemnian word “forty” shows the same internal structure that the corresponding Etruscan word does: number + decade suffix + inflectional ending = ši + alχvi + -s, cf. Etruscan še + alχl + s. This feature cannot be attributed to chance.
The Lemnian language is prominent in discussions of the origins of the Etruscans. The theory that has found some adherents, particularly in the linguistic community, is that the ancestors of the Etruscans arrived in Italy from the northern Aegean, perhaps from somewhere in the vicinity of the Black Sea, in the second half of the second millennium bce.6 The appearance of Lemnian, a language linguistically related to Etruscan, in this geographical area is cited as evidence in support of this idea and is, in the eyes of some, corroborated by the Greek historian Herodotus (I, 94), who relates that the Etruscans were descendants of the Lydians, inhabitants of Anatolia. However, the theory that prehistoric speakers of Etruscan migrated from the northern Aegean finds no support in the archaeological record of central Italy.7 Moreover, the linguistic evidence, although pointing to a genetic affiliation between Lemnian and Etruscan, does not speak clearly to the question of “origins,” which is further complicated by the addition of Raetic to this small family of languages.
Agostiniani, Luciano. “Sull’etrusco della Stele di Lemno e su alcuni aspetti del consonantismo etrusco.” Archivio Glottologico Italiano 71 (1986): 15–46.Find this resource:
Agostiniani, Luciano. “Sulla grafia e la lingua delle iscrizioni anelleniche di Lemnos.” In Le origini degli Etruschi. Storia, archeologia, antropologia. Edited by V. Bellelli, 169–194. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, 2012.Find this resource:
Beschi, Luigi. “I Tirreni di Lemno alla luce dei recenti dati di scavo.” La Parola del Passato 51 (1996): 23–50.Find this resource:
Beschi, Luigi. “Cabirio di Lemno: testamonianze litterarie ed epigrafiche.” Annuario della scuola archeologica di Atene e delle missioni italiane in oriente 74–75 (2000): 7–192.Find this resource:
Cristofani, Mauro. “Nuove iscrizioni ‘tirreniche’ da Lemno.” In Archeologia del Mediterraneo: studi in onore di Ernesto de Miro. Edited by G. Fiorentini, M. Caltabiano, and A. Calderone, 219–222. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, 2003.Find this resource:
De Simone, Carlo. “La stele di Lemnos.” In Rasenna. Storia e civiltà degli Etruschi. Edited by M. Pallottino, 723–725. Milan: Scheiwiller, 1986.Find this resource:
De Simone, Carlo. “La nuova iscrizione tirrenica di Efestia.” Tripodes 11 (2009): 3–58.Find this resource:
Della Seta, A. “Iscrizioni tirreniche di Lemno.” In Scritti in onore di Bartolomeo Nogara, raccolti in occasione del suo LXX anno, 119–146. Rome: Città del Vaticano, 1937.Find this resource:
Meiser, Gerhard. “L’etrusco—la lingua piu antica della Toscana.” In Fra toscanità e italianità: lingua e letteratura dagli inizi al Novecento. Edited by E. Werner and S. Schwarze, 1–14. Tübingen, Germany: Francke, 2000.Find this resource:
Rix, Helmut. “L’etrusco tra l’Italia e il mondo mediterraneo.” In L’Italia e il Mediterraneo antico. Edited by A. Landi, 119–138. Pisa: Giardini, 1995.Find this resource:
(1.) The inscriptions on ceramic are discussed by Luciano Agostiniani, “Sulla grafia e la lingua delle iscrizioni anelleniche di Lemnos,” in Le origini degli Etruschi. Storia, archeologia, antropologia, ed. V. Bellelli (Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, 2012), 173–177; Luigi Beschi, “I Tirreni di Lemno alla luce dei recenti dati di scavo,” La Parola del Passato 51 (1996): 43–48; Mauro Cristofani, “Nuove iscrizioni ‘tirreniche’ da Lemno,” in Archeologia del Mediterraneo: studi in onore di Ernesto de Miro, ed. G. Fiorentini, M. Caltabiano, and A. Calderone (Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, 2003), 219–222; and A. Della Seta, “Iscrizioni tirreniche di Lemno,” in Scritti in onore di Bartolomeo Nogara, raccolti in occasione del suo LXX anno (Rome: Città del Vaticano, 1937), 119–146.
(2.) Agostiniani, “Sulla grafia e la lingua delle iscrizioni anelleniche di Lemnos,” 169–173; and Carlo De Simone, “La stele di Lemnos,” in Rasenna. Storia e civiltà degli Etruschi, ed. M. Pallottino (Milan: Scheiwiller, 1986), 723–725.
(3.) Carlo De Simone, “La nuova iscrizione tirrenica di Efestia,” Tripodes 11 (2009): 3–58.
(4.) The Etruscan word helu appears in the Cippus Perusinus (Pe 8.4, a20–21) in the context of the construction of a tomb (eca . velθinaθuraś θ/aura helu tešne rasne, “this monument of the Velthina family was constructed on public land (?)”).
(5.) The most notable feature of the sound system, when compared to Etruscan, is the lack of the sound /f/, but it is possible that the letter φ did double duty for the sounds /ph/ and /f/.
(6.) See Gerhard Meiser, “L’etrusco—la lingua piu antica della Toscana,” in Fra toscanità e italianità: lingua e letteratura dagli inizi al Novecento, ed. E. Werner and S. Schwarze (Tübingen, Germany: Francke, 2000), 10–12; and Helmut Rix, “L’etrusco tra l’Italia e il mondo mediterraneo,” in L’Italia e il Mediterraneo antico, ed. A. Landi (Pisa: Giardini, 1995), 132–134.
(7.) See Luigi Beschi, “I Tirreni di Lemno alla luce dei recenti dati di scavo,” La Parola del Passato 51 (1996): 23–50, for an overview of Lemnian material culture.