Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Classical Dictionary. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 30 June 2022

damnatio memoriaefree

damnatio memoriaefree

  • John Percy Vyvian Dacre Balsdon
  •  and Barbara Levick

Subjects

  • Reception
  • Roman History and Historiography
  • Roman Material Culture

After the deaths of persons deemed by the senate enemies of the state, measures to erase their memory might follow. Originally there was no set package, as the phrase implies (cf. Ulp.Dig. 24. 1. 32. 7) but a repertoire (Tac.Ann. 3. 17. 8–18. 1): images might be destroyed (Sejanus; Valeria Messal(l)ina), and their display penalized (L. Appuleius Saturninus, 98 bce), the name erased from inscriptions, and a man's praenomen banned in his family (Livy 6. 20. 14; 384 bce!). With emperors their acts were abolished. Claudius prevented the senate from condemning Gaius (1) (Cass. Dio 60. 4. 5); but decrees were passed against Domitian (Suet.Dom.23), Commodus (SHA Comm. 20), and Elagabalus (SHA Heliogab.17).

Bibliography

  • P. Vittinghoff, Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit (1936).
  • R. Bauman, Impietas in Principem (1974), see index.
  • H. I. Flower, The Art of Forgetting (2006).