Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Classical Dictionary. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 May 2021


  • Katharine T. von Stackelburg


Gardens in the Greek and Roman world were both important cultural spaces and essential contributors to the Mediterranean food economy. Originally dedicated to producing useful household plants for the farm, the garden (kēpos, hortus) developed into a highly desirable urban and suburban amenity that combined productive, leisure, and religious space. Gardens’ association with the paradeisos enclosures of Persian and Hellenistic kings also encouraged their use as status symbols that signaled wealth and power. Gardens were also used as spaces of philosophical engagement and religious activity. They serve as an index of colonial and imperialist practice, reflecting the expansion of Greek and Roman territory through the introduction of new plants, and the use of Hellenizing and Orientalizing art and architecture. As cultivated places defined by their proximity to architecture, gardens emerged as an ideal space to explore the intersection between art and nature represented in the idea of the locus amoenus (‘pleasant place’) and the culture of the Roman villa. Advances in archaeological techniques continue to discover evidence for ancient gardens throughout the classical world, with the best-preserved examples found at Pompeii and Herculaneum.

Updated in this version

Article rewritten to reflect current scholarship. Links to digital materials and figures added.

Social and Cultural Role of Gardens in the Ancient Mediterranean

History and Appearance

Although gardens are present throughout the ancient Mediterranean, the most comprehensive evidence is drawn from Roman Italy during the late republic and early empire (c. 70 bce100 ce). Early gardens are not easily distinguished from other types of managed landscape—orchards, groves, and vegetable plots—which makes their development and distribution largely a matter of conjecture. However, from the mid-4th century bce exposure to the established garden cultures of Persia and Egypt combined with increased social mobility and architectural innovation to develop the portico or peristyle garden.

Figure 1. Peristyle Garden, House of Menander, Pompeii.

Katharine T. von Stackelberg.

The introduction of a colonnade, originally a feature of the public palaestra or gymnasium, into the garden area signalled its increasing use as a leisure space.1 The introduction of the portico shifted the emphasis of the domestic garden towards aesthetics and walkability over productivity (Vitr. De arch. 5.9.1–5). Popularized by Epicurus (Diog. Laert. 10.10; Pliny, HN 19.50–51) and Theophrastus, (Diog. Laert. 5.52), the peristyle garden was associated with Greek philosophy, culture, and connoisseurship (see philhellenism).2 It was, therefore, considered an appropriate space for displaying paintings and sculpture (Cic. Fam. 7.23) (see art, ancient attitudes to). The result is an archaeologically recognizable garden type consisting of a mix of ornamental and utilitarian planting, colonnade, and water feature (fountain or pool). Although not every garden was a peristyle garden, its scalability and flexibility allowed it to be used in a wide variety of contexts from modest Pompeiian houses, where the architectural features are present as wall paintings and the plantings confined to pots, to Hadrian’s Villa at Tibur, where the landscaped grounds comprise a series of vast colonnaded water features and pavilions.

During the late republic there was intense competition among the Roman elite to acquire and develop urban and suburban horti (large garden estates attached to an urban villa). These were valued not only for their commercial productivity and aesthetic appeal but because they advertised their owner’s wealth and status through a medium that also conveyed moral virtue and fitness for government (Cato, Ag. pref. 2; Pliny, HN 18.19–20). With the inauguration of the Principate, most of these sites came into imperial ownership and eventually many were converted into public parks.3 This association of gardens with Roman imperial power and Romanization account for their provincial presence, including important examples in the villa of Claudius Togidubnus in Britain, the palaces of Herod the Great at Jericho and Caesarea Maritima, and the palace complex at Petra (see Romanization).4 The letters of Sidonius Apollinaris suggest that gardens continued to be an important feature of elite villa culture well into the 5th century ce (Ep. 2.2).

Economy and Environment

The archaeological visibility of peristyle gardens and the historical associations of Rome’s horti tend to overshadow the fact that the majority of gardens in the ancient Mediterranean were small, often marginal plots characterized more by the concentration of labour and resources than by any specific plants or structures.5 The common features were irrigation, some kind of boundary, and intensive intercultivation. While the content of individual gardens depended on regional variation and personal preference, the literary, visual, and archaeological evidence shows that gardens were generally expected to grow a mix of herbs (culinary and medicinal), vegetables (usually cabbages, leeks, onions, and lettuce), fruit trees, vines, and flowers (usually roses and violets). These small gardens were not only a vital food source, especially for poor families (Columella, Rust. 10. pref. 1–3; Pliny, HN 19.52), but they allowed their owners to participate in the local economy through the sale of fresh or preserved produce, medical supplies, garlands, and honey.6 The garden was, therefore, considered the most important feature of a profitable farm after a vineyard, and buyers were advised to give them high priority when looking for a property (Cato, Ag. 1.7)

Figure 2. Enclosed garden and vineyard with masonry triclinium, Pompeii.

Katharine T. von Stackelberg.

Gardens also attracted a rich selection of edible birds, and irrigation pools often served double use as fishponds (piscinae), increasing their nutritional and economic value.7

In addition to their role in the agricultural economy, gardens also provided employment. The elite interest in horti raised the value of land and encouraged specialization of labour in the form of a topiarius, who specialized in creating an arrangement of walks, views, and plantings to pleasing effect (Cic. QFr. 3.1.5). The development of botanical and specimen gardens required specialist nurseries and encouraged the development of new varietals through selective breeding and hybridization. The role of nurseries as part of the garden economy is identified through the widespread presence of plant pots (ollae perforatae) used by nurseries to raise and transport their stock, both locally and between provinces. The international trade in plants encouraged increasing biodiversity and reflected the interconnectivity of colonies and territories. Agricultural handbooks (see agricultural writers) spanning five centuries provide evidence for the introduction of new species and cultivars and broadly document a process of environmental and ecological change.8

Myth and Religion

Gardens were also used as spaces of religious activity, with altars a common feature in the gardens of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Originally taking the form of a sacred grove (alsos, nemus, lucus) attached to a temple or a particularly venerated tree (Pliny, HN 19.49–50), these semi-wild spaces could only be sustained in urban contexts as planned green space, as demonstrated by the rock-cut planting pits and water channels from the Hephaisteion in Athens.9 The worship of Adonis was celebrated by growing short-lived container gardens. While sacred gardens belonged to their god, individual gardens were under the protection of Priapus, and in general they were associated with Venus and Aphrodite. Etruscan wall paintings and Greek and Latin inscriptions point to a long tradition of tomb gardens (cepotaphia), intended for funeral feasts and annual commemorations. This use may have emerged through the garden’s conceptual links to the mythic space of Elysium and the Hesperides, both associated with death and the afterlife.

Gardens in Literature and Art

Gardens are present in all genres of Greek and Roman literature in a time span that ranges from Homer’s Odyssey to Michael Psellus’s history of Constantine IX (c. 600 bce–1081 ce). Horticulture is referenced in most works by agricultural writers as part of effective farm management, with Columella and Palladius (1) providing the most detailed accounts (a dedicated treatise by Gargilius Martialis is lost). However, the descriptions that have had most influence on Greek and Latin literature are of the garden of Alcinous (Hom. Od. 7.112–131), the garden of the old Corycian (Vir. G. 4.129–146), and letters of Pliny (2) the Younger describing his Laurentine and Tuscan villas (Pliny, Ep. 2.17 and 5.6).10 These sources contributed to the formation of the literary trope of the locus amoenus (pleasant place) characterized by anthropocentrically pleasing arrangements of trees, grass, flowers, and running water. However, positioning the garden at the intersection of art and nature walked a fine line between aesthetic delight and hubristic luxury. Where Horace might delight in his Sabine villa (Hor. Sat. 2.6) and Statius praise the Epicurean sensibility of his patron’s (Stat. Silv. 2.2), Seneca could use them as evidence of moral decay (Sen. Ep. 55.4).11 Ostensibly characterized by leisure (otium), gardens could also serve as places of transgression (especially sexual or gender-based) and danger, as demonstrated by Tacitus’s use of gardens to frame the downfall of Messalina (Tac. Ann. 11.1–37).12 The sensuous nature of gardens also made them ideal spaces for erotic encounter (Longus 2.7). With the advent of Christianity as an officially recognized religion, the gardened locus amoenus was represented as a heavenly, paradisiacal place (Prud. Cath. 5.113–128) and the erotic aspect of gardened space transferred to the more carefully guarded ideal of women’s sexuality as a hortus conclusus (enclosed garden) (see chastity, Christian).

Visual representations of gardens have been preserved in sites buried by Vesuvius and the garden room at Prima Porta (see Livia Drusilla)13

Figure 3. Pomegranate tree and birds from Prima Porta garden room.

Katharine T. von Stackelberg.

These consistently depict arrangements of trees and flowers bordered by paths and low fences, with fountains and displays of statuary or painted panels (pinakes). Birds and mythological figures can also be part of the scene; Dionysiac elements were especially popular—satyrs, maenads, dramatic masks—as were exotic Nilotic elements. Garden sculpture favoured representations of Venus, Apollo, and Dionysus, philosophers, satyrs, muses, hermaphrodites, children, and animals. Curiously, few images of Priapus have been recovered, but this may be because they were traditionally made of wood.14 The plants depicted generally correspond to those mentioned by agricultural writers—the emphasis is on herbs and fruit rather than vegetables—with the addition of shade trees such as oak, laurel, cypress, and plane and ornamental ground plants such as ivy, fern, acanthus, and boxwood.

Post-Classical Reception

Byzantine and early Islamic garden culture maintained and developed many Classical garden features, especially the emphasis on running water.15 Medieval gardens built on the tradition of the hortus conclusus to create both monastic gardens and dedicated female space (famously described in Le Roman de la rose). With the emergence of the Renaissance, the influence of Pliny’s letters encouraged the development of large-scale formal gardens to showcase collections of antique sculpture (one of the best examples can be found at the Villa d’Este, built with discoveries from Hadrian’s Villa).16 In the 18th and 19th centuries, antiquarian interest in gardens was mainly expressed by academician painters such as Lawrence Alma-Tadema. Recreations of Roman houses such as the Pompeijanum at Aschaffenburg made an attempt to incorporate elements of the garden into their structure. Today the finest and fullest examples can be found at the J. Paul Getty Villa in Malibu in California, a recreation of the Villa of the Papyri from Herculaneum that features four large-scale gardens with water features and classical statuary, including a produce garden.17

Figure 4. Grand Peristyle garden, J. Paul Getty Villa, Malibu.

Katharine T. von Stackelberg.

More recently, the artist Ian Hamilton Finlay revisited the tensions of the classical locus amoenus in his garden at Little Sparta, near Edinburgh.18


  • Barret, Caitlíin Eilís. Domesticating Empire: Egyptian Landscapes in Pompeiian Gardens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Carroll‑Spillecke, Maureen. ΚΗΠΟΣ‎: Der antike griechische Garten. Wohnen in der klassichen Polis. Vol. 3. Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 1989.
  • Coleman, Kathleen, and Pascale Derron, eds. Le Jardin dans l’antiquité. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique. Vol. 60. Vandœuvres, Switzerland: Fondation Hardt, 2014.
  • Conticello, Baldassare, and F. Romano, eds. Domus, Viridaria, Horti Picti: Mostra; Casina dell’Aquila. Naples, Italy: Bibliopolis, 1992.
  • Dixon Hunt, John, Michael Leslie, and Kathryn L. Gleason, eds. A Cultural History of Gardens. Vol. 1: A History of Gardens in the Ancient World. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
  • Farrar, Linda. Ancient Roman Gardens. Stroud, UK: Sutton Publishing, 1998.
  • Grimal, Pierre. Les Jardins romains. 3rd ed. Paris: Fayard, 1983.
  • Hartswick, Kim J. The Gardens of Sallust: A Changing Landscape. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2004.
  • Henderson, John. Hortus: The Roman Book of Gardening. London: Routledge, 2004.
  • Jashemski, Wilhelmina. F. The Gardens of Pompeii: Herculaneum and the Villas Destroyed by Vesuvius. 2 vols. La Rochelle, NY: Caratzas, 1979–1993.
  • Littlewood, Antony. R., Henry Maguire, and Joachim Wolschke-Bulmahn, eds. Byzantine Garden Culture. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 2002.
  • Macaulay-Lewis, Elizabeth. “Greek and Roman Gardens.” In Dee L. Clayman (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  • Maguire, Henry. Nectar and Illusion: Nature in Byzantine Art and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • Malek, Amina-Aïcha. Sourcebook for Garden Archaeology: Methods, Techniques, Interpretations and Field Examples. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, 2013.
  • Miller, Naomi F., and Kathryn L. Gleason, eds. The Archaeology of Garden and Field. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.
  • Pagán, Victoria Emma. Rome and the Literature of Gardens. London: Duckworth, 2006.
  • Purcell, Nicholas. “Dialectical Gardening.” Journal of Roman Archaeology 14 (2001): 546–556.
  • Settis, Salvatore. Le pareti ingannevoli: La villa di Livia e la pittura di giardino. Rome: Mondadori Electra, 2002.
  • Spencer, Diana. Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics 39. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • von Stackelberg, Katharine T. The Roman Garden: Space, Sense and Society. London: Routledge, 2009.


  • 1. Jens-Arne Dickmann, “The Peristyle and the Transformation of Domestic Space in Hellenistic Pompeii,” in Domestic Space in the Roman World, JRA supp. 22, ed. Ray Laurence and Andrew Wallace Hadrill (Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 1997), 121–136.

  • 2. Andrew Wallace‑Hadrill, “Horti and Hellenization,” in Horti Romani, Atti del Convegno Internazionale Roma, 4–6 Maggio 1995, BCAR supp. 6, ed. Maddalena Cima and Eugenio La Rocca (Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 1998), 1–12.

  • 3. Kathryn L. Gleason, “Porticus Pompeiana: A New Perspective on the First Public Park of Ancient Rome,” Journal of Garden History 14 (1994): 13–27; and John D’Arms, “Between Public and Private: The epulum publicum and Caesar’s horti trans Tiberim,” in Cima and Rocca, eds. Horti Romani, 33–43.

  • 4. Barry Cunliffe, Fishbourne: A Roman Palace and Its Garden (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971); Kathryn L. Gleason, “The Landscape Palaces of Herod the Great,” Near Eastern Archaeology 77 (2014): 76–97; and Leigh-Ann Bedal, The Petra Pool-Complex: A Hellenistic Paradeisos in the Nabataean Capital (Results from the Petra Lower Market Survey and Excavation, 1998), Gorgias Studies in Classical and Late Antiquity 10 (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2013).

  • 5. Peregrine Horden and Nicholas Purcell. The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000), 220–222.

  • 6. Jerzi Linderski, “Imago Hortorum: Pliny the Elder and the Gardens of the Urban Poor,” Classical Philology 96 (2001): 305–308; and John Henderson, “Columella’s Living Hedge: The Roman Gardening Book,” Journal of Roman Studies 92 (2002): 110–133.

  • 7. Nicholas Purcell, “The Roman Villa and the Landscape of Production,” in Urban Society in Roman Italy, ed. Tim J. Cornell and Kathryn Lomas (London: Routledge, 1995), 151–179.

  • 8. Victoria Emma Pagán, “Horticulture and the Roman Shaping of Nature,” in Oxford Handbooks Online (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).

  • 9. Dorothy Burr Thompson, Garden Lore of Ancient Athens (Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1963).

  • 10. Frederick Jones, Virgil’s Garden: The Nature of Bucolic Space (Bristol, UK: Bristol Classical Press, 2011); Philip Thibodeau, “The Old Man and His Garden (Verg. Georg. 4, 116–148),” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 47 (2001): 175–195; and Bettina Bergmann, “Visualising Pliny’s Villas,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 8 (1995): 406–420.

  • 11. K. Sara Myers, “Docta otia: Garden Ownership and Configurations of Leisure in Statius and Pliny the Younger,” Arethusa 38 (2005): 103–129; Carole E. Newlands, “Statius and Ovid: Transforming the Landscape,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 134 (2004): 133–155; and Diana Spencer, “Horace’s Garden Thoughts,” in City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity. Mnemosyne Supp. 279, ed. Ralph Rosen and Irene Sluiter (Leiden, The Netherlands; Boston: Brill, 2006), 239–274.

  • 12. Mary T. Boatwright, “Luxuriant Gardens and Extravagant Women: The horti of Rome between Republic and Empire,” in Cima and La Rocca, eds., Horti Romani, 71–82; and Katharine T. von Stackelberg, “Performative Space and Garden Transgressions in Tacitus’ Death of Messalina,” American Journal of Philology 130 (2009): 595–624.

  • 13. Barbara A. Kellum, “The Construction of Landscapes in Augustan Rome: The Garden Room at the Villa ad Gallinas,” The Art Bulletin 76, no. 2 (1994): 211–224; Ann Kuttner, “Looking Outside Inside: Ancient Roman Garden Rooms,” Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes 19 (1999): 7–35; and Jane C. Reeder, The Villa of Livia ad Gallinas Albas: A Study in the Augustan Villa and Garden. Archaeologica Transatlantica XX (Providence, RI: Center for Old World Archaeology and Art, 2001).

  • 14. Ailsa Hunt, “Priapus as Wooded God: Confronting Manufacture and Destruction,” Classical Journal 57 (2011): 29–54.

  • 15. Yasser Tabbaa, “The Medieval Islamic Garden: Typology and Hydraulics,” In Garden History: Issues, Approaches, Methods. Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium on the History of Landscape Architecture XIII, ed. John Dixon Hunt (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1992), 303–329.

  • 16. Thomas E. Beck, “Gardens as ‘Third Nature’: The Ancient Roots of a Renaissance Idea,” Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes 22 (2002): 327–334; Pierre de la Ruffinière Du Prey, The Villas of Pliny from Antiquity to Posterity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994). William L. MacDonald and John A. Pinto, Hadrian’s Villa and Its Legacy (London: Yale University Press, 1995); and Alberta Campitelli, “Novae plantae antiquis hortis: Continuity and Innovation in the Roman Villas in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes 23 (2003): 22–41.

  • 17. Katharine T. von Stackelberg, “Reconsidering Hyperreality ‘Roman’ Houses and Their Gardens” in Housing the New Romans: Architectural Reception and Classical Style in the Modern World, ed. Katharine T. von Stackelberg and Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 232–268.

  • 18. Patrick Eyres, “Ian Hamilton Finlay and the Cultural Politics of Neo-Classical Gardening,” Garden History 28 (2000): 152–166.