Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Classical Dictionary. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 06 May 2021

Irenaeusfree

  • Anthony Briggman

Summary

Irenaeus (b. c. 135) was installed as bishop of Lyons after a severe persecution of the churches of Lyons and Vienne took the life of his episcopal predecessor, Pothinus. He was not a native of Roman Gaul, but rather migrated from Asia Minor, where in his younger days he heard the Apostle John teach. Irenaeus’ opposition to Valentinian and Marcionite theologies often casts him as one of the great polemicists of the early Church, but he was also one of the great theologians of the early tradition. Eusebius of Caesarea credits Irenaeus with various treatises, but only two have come down to us: a short work entitled Proof of the Apostolic Preaching, and the work for which he is best known, A Refutation and Overthrow of Knowledge Falsely So-Called—more commonly referred to as Against Heresies. His death is usually dated to the early years of the 3rd century. He is commemorated as a martyr, but evidence for his martyrdom is late.

Updated in this version

Text updated to reflect current scholarship. Digital materials added.

We first learn of Irenaeus from a letter he carried to Eleutherius, bishop of Rome, from the churches of Viennes and Lyons, which were seeking a peaceful resolution to the Montanist controversy (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 5.4.2). The letter introduced Irenaeus as an esteemed presbyter in their community. By the time he returned from his embassy, we are told, a persecution of the churches in Viennes and Lyons had claimed the lives of many, including that of Pothinus, the aged bishop of Lyons. Irenaeus was installed as his successor.

We know little about the new bishop of Lyons. We do know he was not a native of Roman Gaul, where Viennes and Lyons were located, but rather from Asia Minor. Irenaeus tells of seeing and hearing in his early youth Polycarp the bishop of Smyrna (d. c. 155), a disciple of the apostle John (Against Heresies 3.3.4; Eusebius, EH 5.20.5–6). At some point he left Asia Minor for points west, likely spending time in Rome before arriving in the vicinity of Viennes and Lyons. Irenaeus’s death is usually dated to the first few years of the 3rd century. He is commemorated as a martyr, but evidence for his martyrdom is late, the earliest possible testimony coming from the pen of Jerome nearly two hundred years later.1

Eusebius of Caesarea’s Ecclesiastical History credits Irenaeus with various treatises, but only two have come down to us: a short work entitled Proof of the Apostolic Preaching (Prf), long thought to be lost until an Armenian translation was discovered in 1904, and the work for which he is best known, A Refutation and Overthrow of Knowledge Falsely So-Called—more commonly referred to as Against Heresies (AH). The original Greek version of the five books that constitute Against Heresies was available to Armenian translators in the 6th century and was read by Photius in Baghdad in the 9th century, but has since disappeared. Of the original Greek all that remains are extracts, some lengthy, preserved in the works of other writers, and a few fragments in papyri. The fourth and fifth books of Against Heresies are preserved in Armenian in the same manuscript that holds his Proof. Fortunately, a Latin translation was made of the original Greek during the 3rd or 4th centuries. Versions of this translation have come down to us in nine Latin manuscripts, copied between the 9th and 16th centuries. Taken together, the Armenian and Latin translations preserve the work in its entirety.

It is possible that Irenaeus was the author of the Letter from the Churches of Viennes and Lyons to the Churches of Asia and Phrygia, which tells of the persecution that claimed the life of Pothinus and resulted in Irenaeus’s installation as bishop.2 Eusebius quotes portions of a letter from Irenaeus to Florinus, entitled On Monarchy or That God Is Not the Author of Evil (EH 5.20.1, 4–8), and of one to Victor of Rome, in which he pleads with Victor to peacefully settle the Quartodeciman controversy with the churches of Asia (EH 5.24.11–17). The titles of other writings lost to history give some sense for the breadth of Irenaeus’s theological interests. Eusebius knows of a letter to Blastus, On Schism, a work On the Ogdoad, written when Florinus was being drawn toward Valentinian teaching (EH 5.20.1), a treatise Concerning Knowledge, written against the Greeks, and a book of discourses that contains quotations of certain passages from the Epistle to the Hebrews and the Wisdom of Solomon (EH 5.26).

We know little of Irenaeus aside from these works. But that is not to suggest we are wholly ignorant, for certain points can be divined from what has come down to us. His letter to Victor reveals that Irenaeus valued a church governance structure that preserves the communion of the churches that upheld the apostolic tradition by respecting and accepting their differences in liturgical practice, especially when those differences were rooted in tradition. Against Heresies, as well as other titles recorded by Eusebius, shows him to be a polemicist bent on defeating Valentinians, Marcionites, and others whom he regarded as deviating from the faith of the apostolic tradition. Irenaeus’s polemical argumentation, especially his descriptions of the doctrines of his opponents, quickly entered and influenced the subsequent traditionHippolytus, Tertullian, and Epiphanius, amongst others, all drew upon his work. But his extant works show that Irenaeus was not just a polemicist, he was also a theologian intent on preserving the tradition of the faith by promulgating his own theological account. Several features of his theology are well known, including: his identification of the Son and Holy Spirit, Word and Wisdom, as the two Hands of God (e.g., AH 4.20.1); his characterization of the divine economy as involving the growth of human beings toward perfection (e.g., AH 4.38.1; 5.6.1); his eschatology, especially his millennialism (e.g., AH 5.31–35); his affirmation of the GospelsMatthew, Mark, Luke, and Johnand their restriction to these four (e.g., AH 3.11.8–9); and his determination that the “flesh” of 1 Cor. 15:50 does not refer to the material substance of human beings but to those human beings who lack the Holy Spirit and are thus spiritually “dead” (e.g., AH 5.9–14). Less well known but no less significant to the history of Christian thought are his attribution of infinity (e.g., AH 2.1.2; 4.19.2–3) and simplicity (e.g., AH 2.13.3,8–9; 2.28.4–5) to the divine being, affirmation of the atemporal generation of the Word-Son (e.g., AH 2.13.8; 2.17.2–7), belief in the full humanity of Jesus Christ (e.g., 5.1.1; 5.14.2–3; 5.21.1), and his account of the equal divinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as the one God (e.g., AH 4.20.1–4, Prf 3–5). Irenaeus’ writings are the earliest extant record of most of these doctrines. Taken together, his polemical and constructive argumentation show he was an eclectic thinker, willing to draw upon Christian predecessors and contemporaries, Jewish traditions, ancient philosophy, and ancient literary and rhetorical theory. He ranks among the most important theologians of early Christianity and may be the most important prior to Origen.

Links to Digital Materials

Primary Texts

  • Rousseau, Adelin, and Louis Doutreleau, eds. Contre les Hérésies 1.1&2. Sources Chrétiennes 263 & 264. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1979.
  • Rousseau, Adelin, and Louis Doutreleau, eds. Contre les Hérésies 2.1&2. Sources Chrétiennes 293 & 294. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1982.
  • Rousseau, Adelin, and Louis Doutreleau, eds. Contre les Hérésies 3.1&2. Sources Chrétiennes 210 & 211. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1974.
  • Rousseau, Adelin, Charles Mercier, Bertrand Hemmerdinger, and Louis Doutreleau, eds. Contre les Hérésies 4.1&2. Sources Chrétiennes 100.1 & 100.2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1965.
  • Rousseau, Adelin, Louis Doutreleau, and Charles Mercier, eds. Contre les Hérésies 5.1&2. Sources Chrétiennes 152 & 153. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1969.
  • Ter-Mekerttschian, Karapet, and Erwand Ter-Minassiantz, eds. Gegen die Häretiker. Ἔλεγχος καὶ ἀνατροπὴ τῆς ψευδωνύμου γνώσεως‎, Buch 4 u. 5 in armenischer Version. Texte und Untersuchungen 35.2, eds. A. Harnack and C. Schmidt, Leipzig: Hinrich, 1910.
  • Ter-Mekerttschian, Karapet, and Samuel Graham Wilson, Joseph Barthoulot, eds. Εἰς ἐπίδειξιν τοῦ ἀποστολικοῦ κηρύγματος‎. The Proof of the Apostolic Preaching, with Seven Fragments. Patrologia Orientalis 12.5. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1919.

Translations (selected)

  • St. Irenaeus. Against the Heresies. Anti-Nicene Fathers 1. Translated by Alexander Roberts and J. W. H. Rambaut. Edited by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1987.Originally published in 1887.
  • St. Irenaeus of Lyons. Against the Heresies, Book 1. Ancient Christian Writers 55. Translated by Dominic J. Unger and John J. Dillon. New York: Newman Press, 1992.
  • St. Irenaeus of Lyons. On the Apostolic Preaching. Translated by John Behr. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997.

Bibliography

  • Andia, Ysabel de. Homo Vivens: Incorruptibilité et divinisation de l’homme selon Irénée de Lyons. Paris, France: Études augustiniennes, 1986.
  • Bacq, Philippe. De l’ancienne à la nouvelle Alliance selon S. Irénée: unité du Livre IV de l’Adversus Haereses. Paris, France: Éditions Lethielleux, Presses Universitaires de Namur, 1978.
  • Behr, John. Asceticism and Anthropology in Irenaeus and Clement. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Behr, John. Irenaeus of Lyons: Identifying Christianity. Oxford Theology in Context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Briggman, Anthony. Irenaeus of Lyons and the Theology of the Holy Spirit. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • Briggman, Anthony. God and Christ in Irenaeus. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018.
  • Fantino, Jacques. L’homme, image de Dieu, chez saint Irénée de Lyon. Paris, France: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1986.
  • Fantino, Jacques. La théologie d’Irénée. Lecture des Écritures en réponse à l’exégèse gnostique: Une approche trinitiare. Paris, France: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1994.
  • Grant, Robert M. “Irenaeus and Hellenistic Culture.” Harvard Theological Review 42, no.1 (1949): 41–51.
  • Houssiau, Albert. La Christologie de Saint Irénée. Universitas Catholica Lovaniensis Dissertationes 3.1. Louvain, Belgium: Publications Universitaires, 1955.
  • Lashier, Jackson. Irenaeus on the Trinity. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 127. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2014.
  • Lebreton, Jules. De saint Clément a saint Irénée, Vol. 2: Histoire du dogme de la Trinité, des origines au concile de Nicée. Paris, France: G. Beauchesne, 1928.
  • Rousseau, Adelin. “ La Doctrine de Saint Irénée sur la Préexistence du Fils de Dieu dans Dém. 43.” Le Muséon 84 (1971): 5–42.
  • Wingren, Gustaf. Man and the Incarnation: A Study in the Biblical Theology of Irenaeus. Translated by Ross MacKenzie. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1959.

Notes

  • 1. Jerome, Comm. Isaiah 17; Henry Dodwell suggested long ago that Jerome’s identification of Irenaeus as a martyr is actually a scribal gloss (Dissertationes in Irenaeum, Oxford, UK: Theatro Sheldoniano, 1689, pp. 259–265).

  • 2. Eusebius quotes lengthy extracts of this Letter in Ecclesiastical History 5.1. For the suggestion of Irenaeus’s authorship, see Pierre Nautin, Lettres et écrivains chrétiens des IIe et IIIe siècles (Paris, France: Cerf, 1961), 54–61, 93–95.