The Geopolitics of Race, Empire, and Expertise at the ICC
The Geopolitics of Race, Empire, and Expertise at the ICC
- Oumar Ba, Oumar BaCornell University
- K. Jo BluenK. Jo BluenLondon School of Economics
- and Owiso OwisoOwiso OwisoIndependent International Law Researcher
Summary
With the adoption of the Rome Statute in 1998, the international community created the first permanent international tribunal to hold perpetrators of atrocity crimes—namely genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression—accountable. Whereas linear and teleological narratives of progress toward a world of justice and accountability would hail such a major step as a culmination of a journey that Nuremberg set in motion, a critical reading of the origins, discourses, and mechanisms of the Rome Statute system shows the fissures and shaky foundations of problematic dispositions of international criminal law and the current international justice ecosystem. The International Criminal Court, through its design, operations, and mechanisms ensures that accountability for powerful states and their citizens are as constricted as possible, leaving room for an unbalanced, two-tiered international legal system eager to criminalize the subaltern, racialized, citizen of the Global South “other.” As the crisis that marked the (short) history of the Court has deepened, efforts to review and reform the institution have addressed some of these challenges, while still evading other subjects.
Subjects
- International Law
- Organization
- International Relations Theory