Summary

Migration governance is widely acknowledged as a phenomenon, an analytical framework, and a political initiative. It features prominently in government reports, international organizations’ publications, academic studies, and media discussions, particularly in the context of the Global Compacts on Migration and Refugees. Initially conceived as a buzzword for managerial solutions to migration issues, it has evolved to serve as a framework for analyzing complex global dynamics involving diverse actors across various levels.

Examining migration governance at global and regional levels requires understanding the origins of the term “governance,” its introduction into migration studies, its meaning, and the various generations and modalities through which it is expressed. This includes addressing the main criticisms it has faced, particularly the perception that it is a model primarily promoted by Global North countries to serve their interests. Additionally, it is imperative to study migration governance in practice in regions such as Latin America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. This involves identifying the key actors, elements, and processes that define it, along with its potential, limitations, and challenges.

Analysis of regional migration governance processes in practice reveals that analytical frameworks of governance need not be monolithic. Migration governance remains a contested concept and agenda, capable of accommodating different forms of resistance and the creation of alternatives. This perspective allows for a deeper understanding of the power dynamics at play and highlights the potential for diverse and inclusive governance practices.