Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM the OXFORD RESEARCH ENCYCLOPEDIA, NEUROSCIENCE (oxfordre.com/neuroscience). (c) Oxford University Press USA, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Personal use only; commercial use is strictly prohibited (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 October 2019

Plastic Changes After Spinal Cord Injury

Summary and Keywords

Spinal cord injury has instantaneous, destructive effects on bodily functions, as readily demonstrated by muscle paralysis and non-responsiveness to sensory stimulation. This primary response has underlying features at molecular, cellular, tissue and organ levels which will, in a relatively brief time, initiate a secondary cascade of events that exacerbates the extent of the primary focus of damage. Interestingly, the initial extent of motor and sensory loss often is followed by limited, but significant spontaneous functional recovery. Recovery may be due to intrinsic central pattern generators such as for locomotion, the uncovering of dormant anatomical and physiological pathways such as the crossed phrenic for respiration, or to the sprouting of undamaged axons within the spinal cord to establish new connections around or across the injury site. Together the responses to injury and spontaneous efforts for repair represent plastic changes in the central nervous system (CNS) that may result in meaningful functional outcomes, though aberrant sprouting is a possible negative consequence of neuroplasticity that lends caution to the desire for extensive but uncontrolled sprouting.

Keywords: neuroplasticity, spinal cord injury, sprouting, axonal growth, reorganization

Introduction

The immediate consequences of a spinal cord injury (SCI) are loss of purposeful movement and alterations in responses to external stimuli, indicative of disruption of motor and sensory pathways. If this were the extent of the effects of injury, then experimental approaches to foster recovery of function could in some sense be more direct in their design, such as attempting to reconnect axon A to target neuron B for return of a specific function. Unfortunately, SCI triggers a wide range of responses that can be grouped into the primary (acute) phase that is a direct result of the physical trauma incurred by the spinal cord, which then evolves into the secondary phase of dysfunction with persisting (chronic) neurologic instability (Figure 1). It is important to keep in mind that effects of SCI are not confined to the injury site but encompass more distant regions within the central nervous system (CNS) (including the brain) and that most all organ systems of the body may be affected to some extent. To get the full picture of the effects of SCI, molecular and cellular changes, synaptic changes, neuronal responses, glial cell responses, vascular changes, local environmental changes (biochemical and structural), changes in denervated targets, and systemic changes would need to be examined (Figure 1).

Simply defined, a plastic change or plasticity denotes the capacity to be shaped or formed, referring to something that is easily influenced, impressionable, or constructive. Neuroplasticity denotes an ability of neurons and adjacent glial cells to adjust their activity and even their morphology to alterations in their physical or chemical microenvironment or patterns of use. The response to change can be as straightforward as learning and memory in the execution of normal activities or as complex as axon retraction, axon sprouting, or abortive regeneration in response to injury. Axon sprouting is one component of neuroplasticity that can arise from damaged or undamaged axons (Steward, 2014). Collateral sprouting, also called reactive reinnervation, refers to the growth of additional presynaptic processes from the preterminal axon or growth from existing terminals. It is important to distinguish this as growth from an uninjured axon. Compensatory sprouting refers to additional growth and connectivity from an injured axon in the attempt to maintain a certain total axonal arbor. Often this results in the increase in processes proximal to the site of injury. Regenerative sprouting also occurs following axon injury and denotes regrowth of that axon to re-establish connection with the original target or the establishment of alternative pathways to transmit information beyond the lesion site. As a note of caution, not all neuroplasticity results in a positive outcome, as demonstrated by the onset of neuropathic pain or autonomic dysreflexia in a sizable proportion of the SCI community (Brown & Weaver, 2012).

Plastic Changes After Spinal Cord InjuryClick to view larger

Figure 1. Primary and secondary responses to spinal cord injury.

This article presents a brief overview of three aspects of plastic changes after SCI: first is information about spontaneous sprouting of cortical, supraspinal, and propriospinal pathways in the attempt to form new connections around an injury site; second are examples of plasticity that can be functionally appropriate or aberrant; and third is an introduction to the often unrecognized response of distant brain centers to SCI that may present clinically as cognitive or mood disorders. This article focuses on changes in neurons and their axonal processes and attempts to re-establish lost connections and restore function. For clarity and brevity, it does not present information on the myriad of experimental or clinical therapeutic interventions under investigation designed to promote or enhance neuroplasticity or regeneration. The authors certainly recognize that strengthening or reshaping of new connections by physical training or rehabilitation likely will be necessary to ensure the desired or maximal functional outcome (Onifer, Smith, & Fouad, 2011; Fouad & Tetzlaff, 2012).

As an important part of plasticity, there often is a degree of recovery of function that occurs too soon after injury to be due to regeneration and more likely this “spontaneous recovery” can be attributed to return of function from spared neural circuitry (Weidner, Ner, Salimi, & Tuszynski, 2001; Bareyre et al., 2004; Ballermann & Fouad, 2006). An interesting observation in an early study of unilateral cervical contusion injury in rats (Sandrow, Shumsky, Amin, & Houle, 2008) was the significant behavioral improvement between 3 and 7 days after a moderate injury primarily affecting use of the right forelimb. There was an 8-point increase on the forelimb locomotor scale, indicative of improvement from slight movement of one or two joints to frequent plantar stepping. Significant improvement in grid walking and grip strength also occurred. Importantly these improvements were maintained for many weeks and were not diminished by a delayed neural tissue transplantation procedure. Curiously, there appears to be a much greater degree of spontaneous recovery in experimental SCI models compared to the human injury condition, and it is important to further researchers’ understanding about neuroplasticity within animals as a representation of what may effectively be pursued for promoting recovery in humans. Given the large body of work on SCI in rodents, the focus in this article is primarily on studies using this animal model.

Anatomical Features

Sprouting of Descending Spinal Pathways

The corticospinal tract (CST) is comprised of axons projecting from layer V pyramidal neurons in the cerebral cortex through the corona radiata and internal capsule, into the caudal medulla. Along the path through the brainstem as the cortical pyramids, there is extensive collateral sprouting to all motor control regions. In rodents, approximately 85% of CST axons decussate at the medullary pyramids and descend primarily in the contralateral dorsal funiculus to all spinal segments, synapsing with neurons in every lamina throughout the gray matter. Early work by Metz, Dietz, Schwab, and van de Meent (1998) demonstrated that after unilateral pyramidotomy to ablate the CST in adult rats, behavioural deficits in locomotion and balance returned to near baseline levels after 1 month (Metz et al., 1998). These findings highlight the critical contribution of subcortical pathways to motor function and the potential for improvement after SCI. Although the CST is the primary source of fine motor control from the brain, the substantial proportion of redundancy in motor circuitry via subcortical projections offers a potential mechanism for functional reorganization after SCI (Lemon, 2008; Fink, Strittmatter, & Cafferty, 2015).

Central nervous system (CNS) axons exhibit limited intrinsic regenerative capacity compared to peripheral nervous system (PNS) axons (Yiu & He, 2006; Liu, Tedeschi, Park, & He, 2011); however, CNS axons that are spared from injury can form collateral sprouts over short distances to synapse with intact brainstem or propriospinal motor circuits (Raineteau, Fouad, Noth, Thallmair, & Schwab, 2001; Raineteau & Schwab, 2001; Bareyre et al., 2004; Bareyre, Kerschensteiner, Misgeld, & Sanes, 2005; Courtine et al., 2008; Siegel, Fink, Strittmatter, & Cafferty, 2015). A study by Fouad, Pedersen, Schwab, and Brosamle (2001) identified axotomized thoracic CST axons forming functional connections with cervical gray matter, evoking previously unseen forelimb and trunk muscle activity upon cortical stimulation (Fouad et al., 2001). Additionally, Ghosh et al. (2010), using neuronal tracing methods, demonstrated that after lateral hemisection, intact CST axons created new synapses within the spinal cord caudal to the lesion. These collaterals allowed the ipsilateral cortex to exert functional control of the denervated hind paw (Ghosh et al., 2009; Ghosh et al., 2010).

Apart from the predominant dorsal funiculus CST input, some axons from the motor cortex descend ipsilaterally through the ventral, lateral, and dorsolateral tracts of the spinal cord (Vahlsing & Feringa, 1980; Joosten, Schuitman, Vermelis, & Dederen, 1992; Brosamle & Schwab, 1997). Given the segregated nature of these tracts, it is possible that spared CST axons provide a promising resource for plasticity after an incomplete SCI. Weidner et al. (2001) elucidated the distinct role of each CST tract in restoration of skilled forelimb movement after targeted ablation at the cervical level. The greatest deficits in pellet retrieval were seen after bilateral transection of both dorsal and ventral CST tracts, with the deficit persisting up to 4 weeks post-injury. Transection of the medullary pyramids to ablate all major and minor tracts resulted in a persistent deficit in proximal and distal forelimb function during pellet retrieval. Targeted ablation of the major CST tract beneath the dorsal funiculus resulted in significant forelimb motor impairment for the first 3 weeks after injury; yet, pellet retrieval reaching levels were not significantly different from intact rats by the fourth week. Utilizing biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) anterograde tracing of motor cortex neurons, functional improvement in these rats was shown to positively correlate with a significant increase in projections from the ventral CST to medial choline acetyltransferase-positive motor neurons of the ventral horn at C4. This functional plasticity was not seen in injuries that damaged the ventral CST, and functional forelimb recovery after dorsal CST transection was eliminated if a subsequent ventral transection was performed 4 weeks after the initial injury (Weidner et al., 2001). These studies provided novel insight into the importance of the minor CST tracts for functional plasticity despite the small proportion of axons traveling in these pathways.

In addition to CST circuits, subcortical pathway plasticity contributes to the restoration of motor control. The rubrospinal tract (RST) travels near the CST as it descends in the dorsal-lateral funiculus and shares many aspects of CST function. The RST originates in the red nucleus of the brainstem and decussates at the ventral tegmentum to synapse on contralateral intermediate gray matter of the spinal cord. While the RST contributes to upper and lower limb motor control in evolutionarily lesser species, it is mainly responsible for gross motor control of upper limbs in humans. Because of its overlap with the CST, the RST can compensate for fine motor control after injury (Fink & Cafferty, 2016). After specific ablation of the CST at the medullary pyramid, rodent performance in grid-walking analysis, a measure of skilled locomotor function, was significantly impaired (Siegel et al., 2015). At 4 weeks post-injury, skilled locomotor ability demonstrated spontaneous improvement, but a deficit remained when compared to baseline ability. Anterograde tracing in the red nucleus revealed a significant increase in bilateral projections to the basilar pontine nuclei in the brainstem and collaterals to the ventral gray matter in the spinal cord after bilateral pyramidotomy. Plasticity in RST projections to both regions could provide a source for spontaneous locomotor improvement seen after injury, given their role in motor control and coordination (Siegel et al., 2015).

The serotonin system is most closely associated with mood and emotional regulation; however, serotonergic projections from the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) to the spinal cord gray matter also modulate nociceptive and motor input (Jones & Light, 1990; Mason, 2001; Liang et al., 2015). The importance of serotonin (5-HT) to motor circuitry has been demonstrated in animal models of SCI, where intrathecal administration of 5-HT can initiate rhythmic locomotor responses (Barbeau & Rossignol, 1990, 1991). Descending serotonergic axons are principally located in the lateral funiculus and form networks around neurons of the ventral horn (Saruhashi, Young, & Perkins, 1996). After descending ipsilaterally from the brainstem, some of these axons cross the midline through dorsal or ventral gray commissures, suggesting a source of plasticity after injury to one side of the spinal cord (Steinbusch, 1981; Krukoff, Ciriello, & Calaresu, 1985; Saruhashi et al., 1996). After T8 hemisection injury, it was demonstrated that serotonergic axons rostral to the lesion formed large varicosities in ipsilateral white matter and were drastically reduced in the ventral horn caudal to the lesion (Saruhashi et al., 1996). However, in a more chronic injury state, the number of serotonergic axons in the lumbosacral ventral horn had increased significantly. This increase was positively correlated with locomotor ability in the open field, indicating a role for the serotonergic system in functional recovery after SCI. Although this experimental design could not distinguish between regeneration of severed axons and plasticity of spared fibers, the presence of commissural serotonergic fibers from the contralesional spinal cord indicated a likely source of increased serotonergic density in the ipsilateral cord at 4 weeks post-injury (Saruhashi et al., 1996). Providing additional support for serotonergic plasticity after SCI, Kim, Liu, Park, and Strittmatter (2004) demonstrated a reversal of hindlimb motor recovery following specific serotonergic neuron ablation (Kim et al., 2004). Plasticity in the serotonergic systems after injury also occurs in the form of novel motor circuitry. Siegel et al. (2015) demonstrated the importance of the RST input to the NRM in spontaneous locomotor recovery following CST transection. Locomotor improvement was correlated with a significant increase in RST axon terminals in the NRM. Targeted silencing of NRM with inhibitory designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) reversed locomotor ability to that seen at only 4 days post-injury (Siegel et al., 2015). The ability of spared motor circuitry to compensate for CST loss provides promising targets for future functional therapy after SCI.

The reticular formation is comprised of multiple brainstem nuclei contributing to motor and sensory function. The reticular nuclei of the pons and medulla elicit opposing bilateral actions on flexor and extensor motor neurons and are involved in gait and postural stability, projecting through the reticulospinal tract (ReST) in the ventrolateral funiculus. Dual retrograde tracer injection further elucidated reticulospinal circuitry (Reed, Shum-Siu, & Magnuson, 2008). A portion of medullary reticulospinal neurons have axons that cross the midline rostral to T9 and innervate gray matter in both cervical 5/6 and thoracolumbar levels, indicating potential for bilateral motor control that could circumvent a lesion that interrupts CST input to the hindlimbs. Additionally, these neurons were most prominently located in the gigantocellular group of the reticular formation, providing a target for enhancement of plasticity. ReST innervation spanning multiple segments was less prominent in more caudal cervical and lumbar sections (Reed et al., 2008). ReST axons have also been shown to exhibit plasticity with injury. After lateral hemisection of the cervical spinal cord, tracer injections above and below the lesion demonstrate an increase in contralateral cell labeling in the gigantocellular reticular nucleus and an increase in number of axons crossing the midline into the denervated spinal cord, respectively (Zorner et al., 2014). Further analysis of ReST plasticity revealed an increase in supraspinal projections from the mesencephalic locomotor region to the gigantocellular reticular nucleus contralateral to the side of injury, strengthening the potential of this region to enhance motor control. Ablation of the ipsilateral or contralateral gigantocellular reticular nucleus 16 weeks after cervical hemisection revealed specific patterns of bilateral hindlimb motor deficits that are not seen with ablation in an intact rat (Zorner et al., 2014). These data suggest that the ReST and its supraspinal inputs exhibit plasticity that can contribute to restoration of locomotor function after incomplete spinal cord injury.

Although the ReST is generally not involved directly with precise motor function, the enhanced presence of synapses on spinal motoneurons suggests sprouting that potentially reinnervates specific damaged pathways (Fink & Cafferty, 2016). Using unilateral BDA injection into the medullary reticular formation, Ballermann and Fouad (2006) assessed the ability of spared or severed ReST axons to extend into gray matter below and above the lesion site, respectively. After thoracic hemisection contralateral to the injection site, there was a significant increase in collaterals from spared fibers into the dorsal horn ipsilateral to injection at 42 days post-injury. This increase positively correlated with the ability to ambulate post-injury, as assessed by the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale. Conversely, there were no significant differences in density of sprouting from severed axons with hemisection ipsilateral to the injection site. This pattern of plasticity is distinct from the CST, which can circumvent the lesion site by forming compensatory collaterals above the lesion when axons are severed. However, it was determined that many collaterals from spared fibers entered the intermediate lamina, where commissural interneurons of the central pattern generator reside. Functional synapses with these interneurons could allow for innervation of the injured side without the need for sprouting across midline (Ballermann & Fouad, 2006).

Propriospinal Neurons

Spinal cord interneurons whose axons project to different spinal segments are termed propriospinal neurons (PNs), and they provide an important source of neuroplasticity after SCI. PNs are represented by two basic categories of cells: those with axons that extend for a relatively short distance that are important for maintaining the transmission of intersegmental information down the spinal cord; and those with long projecting axons that are responsible for integrating forelimb and hindlimb movement, with axons either ascending or descending between the cervical and lumbar locomotor centers (Conta & Stelzner, 2004; Conta & Stelzner, 2009). Siebert, Middleton, and Stelzner (2010) measured the intrinsic post-injury response of thoracic PNs above the level of injury and found significant increase in regeneration-associated genes and cell survival and neuroprotective genes at 3 days but not at 7 days post-injury, indicative of an early but transient response to axotomy. Flynn, Graham, Galea, and Callister (2011) emphasized the potential role of PNs in contributing to recovery of motor function based upon their location throughout the spinal cord and their proximity to injury at any spinal level, their dense intersegmental projection pattern, and the substantial number of these cells. The authors’ work (Sachdeva, Theisen, Ninan, Twiss, & Houle, 2016) with a lower thoracic SCI and transplantation of segments of peripheral nerve to support axon growth showed strong regenerative effort by mid-lower thoracic PNs and mid-lower lumbar PNs when provided an appropriate substrate. Thus, PNs appear to have a strong potential for contribution to spinal cord plasticity and local efforts to restore functional continuity. How PN plasticity may influence functional recovery after SCI was demonstrated by Courtine and colleagues (2008). They used an opposite side, time-staggered lateral hemisection approach at T7 and T12 levels to limit the relay of descending motor information to PNs within the spared central gray. Anatomical evidence of near total interruption of long descending supraspinal pathways suggested reorganization and sprouting of descending fibers on PNs with short axons for intersegmental integration, behavioral and physiological evaluation of supraspinal control of stepping showed that “precise restoration of point-to-point connections made by long-tract descending axons from the brain to the lumbosacral locomotor circuits is not required to achieve meaningful functional recovery” (Courtine et al., 2008).

There is additional evidence that PNs provide a potential route for axons transmitting descending motor commands to circumvent the lesioned spinal cord tissue. In this manner, the cervical PN network may be considered an extension of the brainstem reticular system necessary to synchronize motor circuits throughout the spinal cord (Zaporozhets, Cowley, & Schmidt, 2006). By use of anterograde axonal tracing techniques, work by Filli et al. (2014) demonstrated regionally specific increases in the number of reticular formation neurons sending axons to the ipsilateral cervical cord after C4 hemisection. Interestingly, most of these fibers were located rostral to the lesion site, principally found in the intermediate and ventromedial gray matter of C3–C4, and they expressed the excitatory synaptic marker vGLUT2. Utilizing a retrograde tracer injected at the C6–C8 level (caudal to the lesion), the synaptic target of these ReST neurons was found to be mid-cervical propriospinal neurons. Because the tracer was injected ipsilesionally, retrograde labeling of these rostral neurons suggested that their axons crossed into the contralesional white matter to circumvent the lesion, and many of them subsequently crossed midline a second time to innervate the ipsilesional C6–C8 intermediate gray and ventral horn. (Filli et al., 2014).

To further study the ability of injured ReST axons to form functional collaterals, May et al. (2017) utilized similar reticular formation tracing techniques as Ballermann and Fouad (2006), combined with a staggered hemisection model. An over-hemisection to include a complete dorsal funiculus was performed at T7 and an additional hemisection contralateral to the first was performed at T9. These injuries were performed either concomitantly or with a delay of 14 days between surgeries. The alternating hemisection injuries minimized sparing of ReST fibers, but provided a bridge to allow connection with PNs. Retrograde tracing caudal to the lesion, in combination with anterograde tracing from the reticular formation, allowed visualization of any PNs from the tissue bridge projecting to the lumbar region. Despite a lack of significant difference in traced ReST collaterals entering the gray matter from white matter tracts between the concomitant and delayed groups, the collaterals present in the delayed group demonstrated growth over longer distances once in the gray matter. Synaptophysin contacts between PNs and traced ReST axons were significantly higher with temporally separated lesions, which correlated with increased locomotion as assessed by open field scoring (May et al., 2017).

Sprouting CST axons utilize the spared PN circuitry after SCI as well. After thoracic dorsal hemisection, Bareyre et al. (2004) demonstrated that CST axons increase collaterals to cervical long and short PNs with axons ventral to the lesion. There was an expanded PN axonal arborization among lumbar motoneurons, thus forming new, functional intraspinal circuitry capable of relaying information from the brain to spinal targets. However, at 12 weeks post-injury, only the long propriospinal connections remained. Additionally, they determined that long propriospinal neurons in the cervical cord were forming functional synapses with lumbar motor neurons that had been retrogradely labeled with Cholera Toxin B. Interestingly, these synaptic connections could be traced all the way to motor cortex neurons after pseudorabies virus injection into the hindlimb muscle. Additionally, hindlimb EMG measurements were recorded after intracortical stimulation and demonstrated a reoccurrence in most animals 12 weeks after injury, which could be abolished by unilaterally severing the sprouting CST axons at the medullary pyramids (Bareyre et al., 2004). This bridging PN plasticity provides an excellent target for re-establishing lost motor circuitry without pursuing a complete regeneration of severed cortical axons.

Functional Plasticity

Crossed Phrenic Pathway

Injury to the cervical spinal cord above the level of phrenic motor control, localized to the cervical 3–6 segments, can lead to disruption of bulbar respiratory control and paralysis of associated respiratory musculature. Early experiments by W. T. Porter in 1895 first demonstrated that upon additional phrenic challenge, such as transection of the contralesional phrenic nerve, the previously paralyzed ipsilesional diaphragm regains functional motor ability (Porter, 1895). This functional restoration phenomenon, known as the crossed phrenic pathway, is thought to be activated by modulation of neuronal output from bulbar respiratory centers (Lewis & Brookhart, 1951; Goshgarian, 2003) as well as morphological plasticity of “functionally ineffective” synapses (Goshgarian & Guth, 1977). Substantial progress has been made in elucidating the circuitry of the respiratory system that could allow phrenic input to circumvent spinal cord injury. In addition to each brainstem ventral respiratory group sending bilateral inputs to cervical motor neurons, decussating at the medullary pyramids (Ellenberger & Feldman, 1988; Ellenberger, Feldman, & Goshgarian, 1990; Feldman, Loewy, & Speck, 1985), axon collaterals from these inputs branch at the level of the phrenic motor pool to innervate the diaphragm bilaterally (Moreno, Yu, & Goshgarian, 1992; Goshgarian, Ellenberger, & Feldman, 1991). Prakash, Mantilla, Zhan, Smithson, and Sieck (2000) discovered a small group of phrenic motor neurons with dendrites that cross the spinal midline, providing another potential source of bilateral motor control. Retrograde trans-synaptic tracing demonstrated a direct, bilateral connection of the ventral respiratory group to phrenic motor neurons ipsilateral to the hemisection, with no labeling of propriospinal neurons in the cervical cord (Moreno et al., 1992), suggesting that propriospinal plasticity does not play a role in functional hemidiaphragm restoration after cervical hemisection.

Morphological changes in the phrenic motor nucleus of the spinal cord began to appear through electron microscopy at 2 hours post-injury (Goshgarian, Yu, & Rafols, 1989) and continued to develop at 30 days after hemisection (Tai & Goshgarian, 1996). Injury-induced plasticity included a significant increase in axon terminals making synaptic contacts with multiple post-synaptic regions in the same plane (Goshgarian et al., 1989), increased post-synaptic density length in both glutamatergic and GABAergic terminals (Tai & Goshgarian, 1996), and increased length and overall number of dendro-dendritic membrane appositions in motor neurons due to retraction of surrounding astroglial processes (Goshgarian et al., 1989; Sperry & Goshgarian, 1993). These cellular changes could allow synaptic input that is subthreshold for activation in normal or acute SCI animals to initiate motor neuron activity upon respiratory challenge and subsequent increase in bulbar respiratory output, initiating the crossed phrenic phenomenon (Goshgarian, 2003).

Recently, it was discovered that crossed phrenic activation after contralesional phrenicotomy in cervical hemisection models may be partly due to a decrease in inhibitory feedback from contralateral sensory afferents of the diaphragm (Golder et al., 2003; Vinit, Stamegna, Boulenguez, Gauthier, & Kastner, 2007). If these sensory afferents are specifically disrupted with contralateral dorsal rhizotomy at the cervical level after a C2 hemisection, crossed phrenic activation is seen without further respiratory challenge (Goshgarian, 1981; Fuller, Johnson, Johnson, & Mitchell, 2002). Increased dorsal horn sensory neuron activity seen after SCI (Hains, Willis, & Hulsebosch, 2003) could partially explain why increased respiratory center output is required to activate the crossed phrenic pathway after hemisection. Application of a GABA-A antagonist to the cervical cord to prevent this inhibitory sensory drive to phrenic motor neurons resulted in crossed phrenic activation of the ipsilesional phrenic nerve (Zimmer & Goshgarian, 2007). An alteration in GABAergic tone after chronic SCI could partially account for spontaneous development of crossed phrenic activation in some rats.

Plasticity in the phrenic circuit is not limited to crossed phrenic pathways in rats, with spontaneous recovery of hemi-diaphragmatic function appearing inconsistently 6 weeks after C2 hemisection but with more stability at 16 weeks post-injury (Nantwi, El-Bohy, Schrimsher, Reier, & Goshgarian, 1999). Phrenic nerve activity ipsilateral to the hemisection recovered to about 30% of control levels by 16 weeks post-injury, with respiratory bursting patterns in the hemidiaphragm that are comparable to those of intact animals (Nantwi et al., 1999). This spontaneous recovery of function may be partially due to plasticity in ipsilateral phrenic circuits spared after injury. Utilizing a chronic lateral cervical hemisection model that spares the medial spinal cord, Vinit, Gauthier, Stamegna, and Kastner (2006) found a complete reduction in phrenic nerve and hemidiaphragm activity on the side ipsilateral to injury similar to a complete hemisection. The spared medial tissue contains a minor, ipsilateral phrenic pathway that could provide a source of plasticity contributing to functional restoration after injury. After spontaneous hemi-diaphragmatic recovery, a subsequent lesion of the contralateral spinal cord containing the cross-phrenic axons did not greatly diminish recovered ipsilateral phrenic nerve activity (Vinit et al., 2008). This would suggest that disruption of the crossed phrenic inputs after chronic SCI is not sufficient to reverse spontaneous recovery provided by ipsilateral circuit plasticity (Vinit et al., 2008). However, the exact mechanism of this spontaneous recovery in more complete lesion models and how acute respiratory recovery may differ from chronic time points needs further study.

Central Pattern Generator and Locomotor Recovery

There has been considerable work directed toward understanding the intricacies of the spinal central pattern generator (CPG) and the influence of supraspinal and sensory afferent input under normal and post-injury conditions. Spontaneous locomotor recovery after a partial spinal cord injury likely involves plasticity of the individual components, such as spared motoneurons, remaining motor and sensory pathways and segmental spinal reflexes, in addition to intrinsic changes to the CPG. This point was described in several reviews by Rossignol and colleagues (Rossignol & Frigon, 2011; Rossignol et al., 2011; Martinez & Rossignal, 2013). To address the impact of SCI on underlying mechanisms of locomotor activity would require much more depth than is possible in this format. Fortunately, an extensive discussion of this area by Serge Rossignol appears in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (Rossignol, 2017).

Aberrant Afferent Plasticity—Neuropathic Pain

Sensory modalities like proprioception, touch, and pain are relayed from the periphery (skin, muscle, etc.) to the spinal cord by primary sensory neurons located within the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) found at each level of the spinal cord. There are many subtypes of primary sensory neurons whose afferents synapse in the superficial dorsal horn and intermediate zone of the spinal cord. These subtypes are distinct in size, molecular phenotype, and degree of myelination. Large, myelinated neurons that provide proprioceptive information innervate muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs (GTOs). Another subclass of large myelinated neurons (Aβ‎) innervate the skin and serve as low-threshold mechanoreceptors of touch, pressure, and vibration. Aδ‎ neurons are lightly myelinated medium-sized neurons that are polymodal, transmitting pressure, cold, and some pain information. The perceptions of pain, temperature, itch, and social touch are mediated by small, unmyelinated c neurons. While the DRG does not demonstrate any somatotopy, the distribution of the central terminals of the different primary neuron subtypes is anatomically distinct (Grant, 1995, Figure 2). The central peptidergic c fibers terminate in lamina I and the outer layer of lamina II, and non-peptidergic c fibers terminate in the inner layer of lamina II. Lightly myelinated Aδ‎ fibers, which transmit both noxious and innocuous information and terminate in laminae I and V; Aβ‎ fibers (also called type II fibers), which transmit innocuous sensory information terminating in laminae III and IV; and the central axons of Ia and Ib neurons terminate in deep gray matter lamina of the intermediate zone (Brown, 1981).

Plastic Changes After Spinal Cord InjuryClick to view larger

Figure 2. Laminar distribution of different subtypes of central axons of primary sensory neurons. The central axon of the Aα‎ subgroup, also known as group Ia, Ib, and group II afferents, that innervate muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs (GTOs) in the periphery terminate laminas VII and IX in the ventral horn. The central projection of the Aβ‎ subgroup transmit low-threshold mechanosensory information and terminate in deep dorsal horn laminae (IV and V). The Aδ‎ subtype of primary sensory neurons is polymodal, transmitting both innocuous mechanosensory information as well as nociceptive information from the periphery to superficial lamina I and deep dorsal horn lamina V. Two main subclasses of c fibers, the peptidergic (pep) and non-peptidergic (non-pep), terminate in lamina I and lamina II, respectively. These small diameter neurons transmit thermoception, nociception, and pruritoception. Adapted and redesigned from Lallemend and Emfors (2012).

The central axon of the Aα‎ subgroup, also known as group Ia, Ib, and group II afferents, innervates muscle spindles and GTOs in the periphery terminate in laminas VII and IX in the ventral horn. The central projection of the Aβ‎ subgroup transmits low-threshold mechanosensory information and terminates in deep dorsal horn laminae (IV and V). The Aδ‎ subtype of primary sensory neurons is polymodal, transmitting both innocuous mechanosensory information as well as nociceptive information from the periphery to superficial lamina I and deep dorsal horn lamina V. Two main subclasses of c fibers, the peptidergic (pep) and non-peptidergic (non-pep), terminate in lamina I and lamina II, respectively. These small diameter neurons transmit thermoception, nociception, and pruritoception.

Plasticity in the nociceptive system likely evolved as a defense mechanism by transiently increasing the sensitivity of neurons in the pain pathway, providing protection of a wound until it healed (Price & Dussor, 2014). However, after injury to the nervous system, this protective mechanism does not resolve and chronic neuropathic pain develops (Costigan, Scholz, & Woolf, 2009). Clinical hallmarks of SCI-induced neuropathic pain include allodynia—when innocuous stimuli elicit a painful response and hyperalgesia—when noxious stimuli elicit an exaggerated painful response. While direct damage to ascending and descending systems is certainly a contributor to aberrant nociceptive processing after SCI (Hains et al., 2003; Hains, Saab, & Waxman, 2005; Gwak, Crown, Unabia, & Hulsebosch, 2008; Masri et al., 2009; Davoody et al., 2011), plasticity occurring in the primary sensory neurons may be sufficient to induce pain. This maladaptive, dysfunctional plasticity is supported by both anatomical and electrophysiological evidence.

Dramatic arborization of sensory afferent fibers occurs in the deep dorsal horn (laminas III–V) above, at, and below the lesion epicenter in clinical (Kakulas, 2004) as well as experimental SCI (Krenz & Weaver, 1998; Ondarza, Ye, & Hulsebosch, 2003; Weaver et al., 2001). The authors recently showed a similar increase in the density and distribution of non-peptidergic c afferents within the dorsal horn in rats with SCI-induced neuropathic pain (Detloff, Smith, Quiros-Molina, Ganzer, & Houlé, 2014; Detloff et al., 2016). They showed that SCI-induced pain correlates with an increase in the density and expansion of the topographical distribution of both peptidergic and non-peptidergic nociceptive afferents in the dorsal horn (Figure 3). An overlapping distribution of peptidergic non-peptidergic primary afferent fibers in the dorsal horn that correlates with allodynic behavior could implicate one of two possibilities. The first is that nociceptive primary sensory neurons may be expanding their terminal fields into regions of the dorsal horn that is normally innervated by large, cutaneous Aβ‎ primary sensory neurons, or vice versa. It can be inferred from either of these scenarios that these additional aberrant afferent inputs creates a disruption of the balance between primary afferent, descending modulatory, and spinal interneuronal inputs on dorsal horn neurons in deeper dorsal horn laminae (Woolf, 1983; Woolf & Walters, 1991; Woolf, Shortland, & Coggeshall, 1992; Shortland, Woolf, & Fitzgerald, 1989; Shortland & Woolf, 1993). The second possibility is that the aberrant distribution of afferents is not sprouting, but rather represents a change in the phenotypic or molecular identity of other types of primary sensory neurons (i.e., non-nociceptive neurons become nociceptive) (Nitzan-Luques, Devo, & Tal, 2011; Nitzan-Luques, Minert, Devor, & Tal, 2013; Bester, Beggs, & Woolf, 2000; Molander, Hongpaisan, & Persson, 1994). Injuries to the spinal cord or peripheral nervous system activate genomic programs in all primary sensory neurons (not just nociceptive c neurons). One consequence of transcriptional changes is that some low-threshold Aβ‎ neurons acquire the molecular phenotype of c neurons (Woolf & Costigan, 1999; Nitzan-Luques et al., 2013). This allows these neurons to respond to stimuli in a nociceptive rather than cutaneous manner (i.e., central sensitization). De novo expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in Aβ‎ afferents has been shown in rats with SCI-induced autonomic dysreflexia, and this change in expression could render these afferents capable of enhancing pain (Hou, Duale, & Rabchevsky, 2009). SCI induces alterations in the electrophysiological properties of neurons as well. Bedi et al. (2010) showed that SCI increased the incidence of spontaneous activity and robust hyperexcitability of primary sensory neurons that transmit pain information. Reduction of this heightened activity and excitability is sufficient to reduce pain behavior after experimental SCI. Taken together, these data suggest that an aberrant anatomical and functional plasticity of primary sensory neurons is strongly correlated with the dysfunction of the sensory system, namely pain development after SCI.

Plastic Changes After Spinal Cord InjuryClick to view larger

Figure 3. Aberrant nociceptive afferent plasticity is associated with development of chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. (A) After unilateral cervical SCI, both subtypes of nociceptive primary afferent fibers increase their topographic distribution in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord which corresponds to the development of chronic neuropathic pain. Animals demonstrating pain-like behaviors have significantly greater distribution and density of both peptidergic and non-peptidergic primary afferent fibers within the superficial dorsal horn laminae. (B) There are two accepted mechanisms to explain this aberrant plasticity of nociceptive afferents. The first is SCI-induced sprouting of nociceptive afferents, with the initiation of plasticity and growth-associated gene programs after injury. The second is SCI-induced switch in the molecular phenotypes of primary sensory neurons. For example, a non-nociceptive Ab touch neuron could begin to express receptors, peptides, and so on, that are typically found in pain-sensing neurons. Likewise, different subpopulations of nociceptive neurons could also alter their molecular signature.

Under normal conditions, peptidergic and non-peptidergic primary afferent fibers terminate in distinct dorsal horn laminae. Peptidergic fibers terminate in lamina I and the outer layer of lamina II (also called IIo), while non-peptidergic afferent fibers terminate in the inner layer of lamina II (denoted as Iii). After unilateral cervical SCI, both subtypes of nociceptive primary afferent fibers increase their topographic distribution in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord which corresponds to the development of chronic neuropathic pain. Animals demonstrating pain-like behaviors have significantly greater distribution and density of both peptidergic and non-peptidergic primary afferent fibers within the superficial dorsal horn laminae.

Changes in Brain Function

Sensorimotor Cortex Plasticity

Cortical reorganization of motor and sensory areas has been demonstrated after SCI in human subjects as well as in rodent models (Raineteau & Schwab, 2001; Moxon, Oliviero, Aguilar, & Foffani, 2014). Within minutes of a thoracic transection lesion there is evidence of functional reorganization in the primary somatosensory cortex (i.e., an increase in cortical responses evoked by forepaw stimuli and a switch to a network state of slow-wave activity) (Aguilar et al., 2010). Based upon the observation of post-SCI expansion of forelimb cortical representation to include the denervated hindlimb cortex (Endo, Spenger, Tominaga, Brene, & Olson, 2007), Ghosh and colleagues (2009) examined the sensory representation and corticospinal projections of the cortex ipsilateral to a C3–4 lateral hemisection lesion. At 12 weeks, they detected enhanced representation of the unimpaired forepaw; stimulation of the ipsilesional hind paw showed distinct activation of hindlimb areas in the intact, ipsilateral cortex; and anterograde tracing showed sprouting of corticospinal tract axons to recross the midline at cervical and lumbar spinal cord levels. The authors noted the potential of this sprouting to functionally compensate for disconnected contralateral neurons.

Imaging studies in humans with SCI often demonstrate an increase in cortical activity and metabolism corresponding to spared regions, such as the upper limbs (Roelcke et al., 1997; Bruehlmeier et al., 1998; Curt et al., 2002a; Curt, Bruehlmeier, Leenders, Roelcke, &, Dietz, 2002b). There are robust differences in the degree of cortical plasticity and functional recovery based on the developmental stage of the nervous system at the time of SCI. Rodent models appear less consistent and generally are characterized by the age of the animal at the time of injury and the injury severity. Interestingly, rats receiving spinal cord transection in adulthood have shown an increase in blood flow to somatosensory regions of the cortex (Endo et al., 2007) that do not correlate with an increase in neuronal activity in the same region, as measured by electrophysiological techniques (Graziano, Foffani, Knudsen, Shumsky, & Moxon, 2013). Many labs have demonstrated the enhanced ability of the cortex to reorganize after a neonatal SCI, with earlier injury time points resulting in greater cortical plasticity into adulthood. Giszter, Kargo, Davies, and Shibayama (1998) and Giszter, Davies, and Graziani (2007) determined that after a neonatal T8–T9 transection, adult rats that regained weight-supported stepping had an expanded motorcortex representation of axial trunk muscles, likely working in synergy with novel forelimb sensory representation to maintain balance and reduce force transmission to hindlimbs. In adult rats, a study of exercise therapy and serotonin agonist administration after SCI demonstrated a response like that observed in the neonatal preparation (i.e., reorganization of the motor cortex to enhance trunk muscle recruitment) (Manohar, Foffani, Ganzer, Bethea, & Moxon, 2017). The increase in trunk representation corresponded with functional increases in weight-supported stepping that were reduced upon lesion of the corresponding remodeled cortex. Additionally, the presence of a remodeled trunk motor cortex correlated with an increase in axonal sprouting to the spinal cord rostral to the lesion site. Somatosensory cortex representing forelimbs was also expanded after treatment, again suggesting a synergistic role between the two modalities in achieving functional improvements (Manohar et al., 2017).

Mood Disorder—Post-SCI Depression

Incidence of depression is three times higher in patients with SCI, with very few guidelines for targeted treatment (Fann et al., 2011). Comorbidity of depression and SCI has a profound impact on quality of life, correlating with less functional improvement during rehabilitation as well as an increase in overall morbidity (Fann et al., 2011). The estimated lifetime cost per person of SCI treatment is $5 million, with annual costs for acute treatment often exceeding 50% of patient income (World Health Organization, 2013). This cost is also higher in patients with depression, compounded by a decrease in independent functioning, longer periods of bed rest, and a greater need for paid personal care (Fann et al., 2011).

Tissue damage after SCI stimulates the production of cytokines that can cross the blood–brain barrier to enter the CNS, causing secondary damage well beyond the site of the initial lesion (Popovich et al., 1999; Schwab, Zhang, Kopp, Brommer, & Popovich, 2014). Interactions of the immune system and serotonin metabolism provide a potential link for a specific etiology of depression and SCI. The raphe nuclei, the main source of serotonin to the brain, can specifically be affected through damage to descending projections to the spinal cord that modulate motor circuits (Schmidt & Jordon, 2000). Axonal injury and subsequent degeneration of injured descending serotonergic projections from the raphe nuclei to each level of the spinal cord could potentially cause an inflammatory reaction within the dorsal raphe nucleus, a region with diffuse serotonergic projections to limbic regions (Beattie, Farooqui, & Bresnahan, 2000; Schmidt & Jordon, 2000). Dyfunction in limbic circuitry, parts of which are represented in Figure 4, has been implicated in the development of psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety, and drug abuse (Hensler, 2006).

Plastic Changes After Spinal Cord InjuryClick to view larger

Figure 4. The dorsal raphe nucleus (DR) contains serotonergic neurons with diffuse projections to limbic structures; hippocampus (HP), amygdala (Amy), hypothalamus (Hypo), nucleus accumbens (NAc) and associated monoaminergic nuclei, and ventral tegmental area (VTA). Local GABAergic interneurons reside in the dorsal raphe and modulate serotonergic activity with input from the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Plasticity in serotonergic inputs to other neurotransmitter systems, such as glutamatergic, dopaminergic, and GABAergic, could contribute to the development of affective disorders after SCI. Adapted and redesigned from Nestler and Carlezon (2006).

Utilizing a moderate T9 midline contusion injury model, Luedtke et al. (2014) established a battery of behavioral tests, including Sucrose Preference, Forced Swim Test, Social Interaction, and Burrowing to accurately identify a depressive phenotype in male rodents after SCI. A subsequent study from Maldonado-Bouchard et al. (2016) confirmed that tumor necrosis factor α‎ (TNFα‎) was increased in serum and hippocampal lysate from male rats with a depressive-anxious phenotype after chronic SCI. Using a similar injury and depressive battery in adult female rats, the authors have preliminary data (Farrell, Detloff, & Houle, 2017) that shows a significant increase in the level of TNFα‎ in the dorsal raphe in rats that display a depressive phenotype. Inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα‎ can have many modulatory effects on neuronal circuitry, from altering GABA and AMPA membrane trafficking to increasing metabolism of serotonin and its precursors (Clement et al., 1997; Ferguson et al., 2008; Beattie, Ferguson, & Bresnahan, 2010; Stuck et al., 2012; Pribiag & Stellwagen, 2013). Disrupting the excitatory–inhibitory balance of serotonergic activity could contribute to a depressive phenotype after SCI. This balance also could be disrupted through dysregulation of glutamate homeostasis, normally tightly controlled by locally residing astrocytes. Astrocytes are heavily responsible for reuptake of extracellular glutamate through expression of glutamate transporter 1 (GLT1) (Maragakis & Rothstein, 2004). In vitro cell culture and tissue slice studies have demonstrated the ability of TNFα‎ to decrease expression of GLT1 on astrocytes (Fine et al., 1996; Pitt, Nagelmeier, Wilson, & Raine, 2003; Zou & Crews, 2005). Using the authors’ T9 contusion model of depression, they confirmed a significant decrease in the level of GLT1 in the dorsal raphe of rats with depressive phenotype, suggesting that regulation of serotonergic neuron activity has a role in onset or maintainance of post-SCI depression.

Along with inflammatory changes in the CNS, SCI leads to plasticity in mRNA and protein expression in a variety of brain regions involved in depressive pathology. Wu et al. (2014) performed depression and cognitive behavioral assessments in mice 56 days after moderate T9 contusion injury to assess changes in inflammatory state and cellular function with this pathology. Depressive phenotype in these mice was associated acutely with a significant increase in hippocampal mRNA for cyclin D1, A1, A2, and PCNA, with the last three remaining elevated through 3 months post-injury (Wu et al., 2014). These proteins are involved with activation and maintenance of the cell cycle, even in post-mitotic cells, which has been shown to cause neuronal apoptosis in vitro and in vivo (Padmanabhan, Park, Greene, & Shelanski, 1999, Wu et al., 2011). This effect was confirmed by a significant reduction in hippocampal cell number in SCI mice at the chronic time point (Wu, Stoica, & Faden, 2014). Subsequent work from Wu et al. (2016) established additional cellular plasticity in the form of endoplasmic reticulum stress protein upregulation in the cortex, hippocampus, and thalamus, suggesting an alteration in neuronal function associated with post-SCI depression. These regions are heavily involved in emotional processing and receive direct input from the dorsal raphe (Matsuzaki, Takada, Li, Tokuno, & Mizuno, 1993). These findings suggest that changes in supraspinal circuitry and neuronal function after SCI could lead to the development of effective disorders such as major depressive disorder.

Concluding Remarks

“Plasticity” can mean something very different to each investigator, which is not surprising given the wide range of changes in molecular, cellular, and functional activity observed throughout the CNS after a spinal cord injury. In most cases, researchers eagerly anticipate some beneficial effects of plasticity, yet remain cognizant of the potential for worsening conditions due to aberrant plasticity. While it is not possible to prevent the initial trauma to the spinal cord suffered during a motor vehicle accident or fall, it is encouraging that some semblance of spontaneous recovery attributable to CNS plasticity often is observed and that labs around the world are focused on therapeutic interventions to further advance the return of function after SCI.

References

Aguilar, J., Humanes-Valera, D., Alonso-Calvino, E., Yague, J. G., Moxon, K. A., Oliviero, A., & Foffani, G. (2010). Spinal cord injury immediately changes the state of the brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 7528–7537.Find this resource:

Ballermann, M., & Fouad, K. (2006). Spontaneous locomotor recovery in spinal cord injured rats is accompanied by anatomical plasticity of reticulospinal fibers. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 1988–1996.Find this resource:

Barbeau, H., & Rossignol, S. (1990). The effects of serotonergic drugs on the locomotor pattern and on cutaneous reflexes of the adult chronic spinal cat. Brain Research, 514, 55–67.Find this resource:

Barbeau, H., & Rossignol, S. (1991) Initiation and modulation of the locomotor pattern in the adult chronic spinal cat by noradrenergic, serotonergic and dopaminergic drugs. Brain Research, 546, 250–260.Find this resource:

Bareyre, F. M., Kerschensteiner, M., Misgeld, T., & Sanes, J. R. (2005). Transgenic labeling of the corticospinal tract for monitoring axonal responses to spinal cord injury. Nature Medicine, 11, 1355–1360.Find this resource:

Bareyre, F. M., Kerschensteiner, M., Raineteau, O., Mettenleiter, T. C., Weinmann, O., & Schwab, M. E. (2004). The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 269–277.Find this resource:

Beattie, M. S., Farooqui, A. A., & Bresnahan, J. C. (2000). Review of current evidence for apoptosis after spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 17, 915–925.Find this resource:

Beattie, M. S., Ferguson, A. R., & Bresnahan, J. C. (2010). AMPA-receptor trafficking and injury-induced cell death. European Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 290–297.Find this resource:

Bedi, S. S., Yang, Q., Crook, R. J., Du, J., Wu, Z., Fishman, H. M., . . . Walters, E. T. (2010). Chronic spontaneous activity generated in the somata of primary nociceptors is associated with pain-related behavior after spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 14870–14882.Find this resource:

Bester, H., Beggs, S., & Woolf, C. J. (2000). Changes in tactile stimuli-induced behavior and c-Fos expression in the superficial dorsal horn and in parabrachial nuclei after sciatic nerve crush. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 428(1), 45–61.Find this resource:

Brosamle, C., & Schwab, M. E. (1997). Cells of origin, course, and termination patterns of the ventral, uncrossed component of the mature rat corticospinal tract. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 386, 293–303.Find this resource:

Brown, A., & Weaver, L. C. (2012). The dark side of neuroplasticity. Experimental Neurology, 235, 133–141.Find this resource:

Brown, A. G. (1981). Organization of the spinal cord. New York, NY: Springer.Find this resource:

Bruehlmeier, M., Dietz, V., Leenders, K. L., Roelcke, U., Missimer, J., & Curt, A. (1998). How does the human brain deal with a spinal cord injury? European Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 3918–3922.Find this resource:

Clement, H. W., Buschmann, J., Rex, S., Grote, C., Opper, C., Gemsa, D., & Wesemann, W. (1997). Effects of interferon-gamma, interleukin-1 beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on the serotonin metabolism in the nucleus raphe dorsalis of the rat. Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna, Austria, 1996), 104, 981–991.Find this resource:

Conta, A. C., & Stelzner, D. J. (2004). Differential vulnerability of propriospinal tract neurons to spinal cord contusion injury. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 479, 347–359.Find this resource:

Conta, A. C., & Stelzner, D. J. (2009). The propriospinal system. In C. Watson, G. Paxinos, & G. Kayalioglu (Eds.), The spinal cord (pp. 180–190). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Costigan, M., Scholz, J., & Woolf, C. J. (2009). Neuropathic pain: A maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 1–32.Find this resource:

Courtine, G., Song, B., Roy, R. R., Zhong, H., Herrmann, J. E., Ao, Y., . . . Sofroniew, M. V. (2008). Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nature Medicine, 14, 69–74.Find this resource:

Curt, A., Alkadhi, H., Crelier, G. R., Boendermaker, S. H., Hepp-Reymond, M. C., & Kollias, S. S. (2002a). Changes of non-affected upper limb cortical representation in paraplegic patients as assessed by fMRI. Brain, 125, 2567–2578.Find this resource:

Curt, A., Bruehlmeier, M., Leenders, K. L., Roelcke, U., &, Dietz, V. (2002b). Differential effect of spinal cord injury and functional impairment on human brain activation. Journal of Neurotrauma, 19, 43–51.Find this resource:

Davoody, L., Quiton, R. L., Lucas, J. M., Ji, Y., Keller, A., & Masri, R. (2011). Conditioned place preference reveals tonic pain in an animal model of central pain. Journal of Pain, 12, 868–874.Find this resource:

Detloff, M. R., Quiros-Molina, D., Javia, A. S., Daggubati, L., Nehlsen, A. D., Naqvi, A., . . . Houlé, J. D. (2016). Delayed exercise is ineffective at reversing aberrant nociceptive afferent plasticity or neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury in rats. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 30(7), 685–700.Find this resource:

Detloff, M. R., Smith, E. J., Quiros-Molina, D., Ganzer, P. D., & Houlé, J. D. (2014). Acute exercise prevents the development of neuropathic pain and the sprouting of non-peptidergic (GDNF- and artemin-responsive) c-fibers after spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology, 255, 38–48.Find this resource:

Ellenberger, H. H., & Feldman, J. L. (1988). Monosynaptic transmission of respiratory drive to phrenic motoneurons from brainstem bulbospinal neurons in rats. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 269, 47–57.Find this resource:

Ellenberger, H. H., Feldman, J. L., & Goshgarian, H. G. (1990). Ventral respiratory group projections to phrenic motoneurons: Electron microscopic evidence for monosynaptic connections. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 302, 707–714.Find this resource:

Endo, T., Spenger, C., Tominaga, T., Brene, S., & Olson, L. (2007). Cortical sensory map rearrangement after spinal cord injury: fMRI responses linked to Nogo signalling. Brain, 130, 2951–2961.Find this resource:

Fann, J. R., Bombardier, C. H., Richards, J. S., Tate, D. G., Wilson, C. S., & Temkin, N. (2011). Depression after spinal cord injury: Comorbidities, mental health service use, and adequacy of treatment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 352–360.Find this resource:

Farrell, K., Detloff, M. R., & Houle, J. D. (2017). Neuroinflammation and dorsal raphe neuronal activity associated with depression after spinal cord injury. Abstracts Society for Neuroscience, 246, 19.Find this resource:

Feldman, J. L., Loewy, A. D., & Speck, D. F. (1985). Projections from the ventral respiratory group to phrenic and intercostal motoneurons in cat: An autoradiographic study. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 1993–2000.Find this resource:

Ferguson, A. R., Christensen, R. N., Gensel, J. C., Miller, B. A., Sun, F., Beattie, E. C., . . . Beattie, M. S. (2008). Cell death after spinal cord injury is exacerbated by rapid TNF alpha-induced trafficking of GluR2-lacking AMPARs to the plasma membrane. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 11391–11400.Find this resource:

Filli, L., Engmann, A. K., Zorner, B., Weinmann, O., Moraitis, T., Gullo, M., . . . Schwab, M. E. (2014). Bridging the gap: A reticulo-propriospinal detour bypassing an incomplete spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 13399–13410.Find this resource:

Fine, S. M., Angel, R. A., Perry, S. W., Epstein, L. G., Rothstein, J. D., Dewhurst, S., & Gelbard, H. A. (1996). Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibits glutamate uptake by primary human astrocytes. Implications for pathogenesis of HIV-1 dementia. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 271, 15303–15306.Find this resource:

Fink, K. L., & Cafferty, W. B. (2016). Reorganization of intact descending motor circuits to replace lost connections after injury. Neurotherapeutics, 13, 370–381.Find this resource:

Fink, K. L., Strittmatter, S. M., & Cafferty, W. B. (2015). Comprehensive corticospinal labeling with mu-crystallin transgene reveals axon regeneration after spinal cord trauma in ngr1-/- mice. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 15403–15418.Find this resource:

Flynn, J. R., Graham, B. A., Galea, M. P., & Callister, R. J. (2011). The role of propriospinal interneurons in recovery from spinal cord injury. Neuropharmacology, 60, 809–822.Find this resource:

Fouad, K., Pedersen, V., Schwab, M. E., & Brosamle, C. (2001). Cervical sprouting of corticospinal fibers after thoracic spinal cord injury accompanies shifts in evoked motor responses. Current Biology: CB, 11, 1766–1770.Find this resource:

Fouad, K., & Tetzlaff, W. (2012). Rehabilitative training and plasticity following spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology, 235, 91–99.Find this resource:

Fuller, D. D., Johnson, S. M., Johnson, R. A., & Mitchell, G. S. (2002). Chronic cervical spinal sensory denervation reveals ineffective spinal pathways to phrenic motoneurons in the rat. Neuroscience Letters, 323, 25–28.Find this resource:

Ghosh, A., Haiss, F., Sydekum, E., Schneider, R., Gullo, M., Wyss, M. T., . . . Schwab, M. E. (2010). Rewiring of hindlimb corticospinal neurons after spinal cord injury. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 97–104.Find this resource:

Ghosh, A., Sydekum, E., Haiss, F., Peduzzi, S., Zorner, B., Schneider, R., . . . Schwab, M. E. (2009). Functional and anatomical reorganization of the sensory-motor cortex after incomplete spinal cord injury in adult rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 12210–12219.Find this resource:

Giszter, S. F., Davies, M. R., & Graziani, V. (2007). Motor strategies used by rats spinalized at birth to maintain stance in response to imposed perturbations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 2663–2675.Find this resource:

Giszter, S. F., Kargo, W. J., Davies, M., & Shibayama, M. (1998). Fetal transplants rescue axial muscle representations in M1 cortex of neonatally transected rats that develop weight support. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 3021–3030.Find this resource:

Golder, F. J., Fuller, D. D., Davenport, P. W., Johnson, R. D., Reier, P. J., & Bolser, D. C. (2003). Respiratory motor recovery after unilateral spinal cord injury: Eliminating crossed phrenic activity decreases tidal volume and increases contralateral respiratory motor output. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2494–2501.Find this resource:

Goshgarian, H. G. (1981). The role of cervical afferent nerve fiber inhibition of the crossed phrenic phenomenon. Experimental Neurology, 72, 211–225.Find this resource:

Goshgarian, H. G. (2003). The crossed phrenic phenomenon: A model for plasticity in the respiratory pathways following spinal cord injury. Journal of Applied Physiology, 94, 795–810.Find this resource:

Goshgarian, H. G., Ellenberger, H. H., & Feldman, J. L. (1991). Decussation of bulbospinal respiratory axons at the level of the phrenic nuclei in adult rats: A possible substrate for the crossed phrenic phenomenon. Experimental Neurology, 111, 135–139.Find this resource:

Goshgarian, H. G., & Guth, L. (1977). Demonstration of functionally ineffective synapses in the guinea pig spinal cord. Experimental Neurology, 57, 613–621.Find this resource:

Goshgarian, H. G., Yu, X. J., & Rafols, J. A. (1989). Neuronal and glial changes in the rat phrenic nucleus occurring within hours after spinal cord injury. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 284, 519–533.Find this resource:

Grant, G. (1995). Primary afferent projections to the spinal cord. In G. Paxinos (Ed.), The rat nervous system (pp. 61–66). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Graziano, A., Foffani, G., Knudsen, E. B., Shumsky, J., & Moxon, K. A. (2013). Passive exercise of the hind limbs after complete thoracic transection of the spinal cord promotes cortical reorganization. PLoS One, 8, e54350.Find this resource:

Gwak, Y. S., Crown, E. D., Unabia, G. C., & Hulsebosch, C. E. (2008). Propentofylline attenuates allodynia, glial activation and modulates GABAergic tone after spinal cord injury in the rat. Pain, 138, 410–422.Find this resource:

Hains, B. C., Saab, C. Y., & Waxman, S. G. (2005). Changes in electrophysiological properties and sodium channel Nav1.3 expression in thalamic neurons after spinal cord injury. Brain, 128, 2359–2371.Find this resource:

Hains, B. C., Willis, W. D., & Hulsebosch, C. E. (2003). Temporal plasticity of dorsal horn somatosensory neurons after acute and chronic spinal cord hemisection in rat. Brain Research, 970, 238–241.Find this resource:

Harvey, P., Gong, B.-J., Rossomando, A. J., & Frank, E. (2010). Topographically specific regeneration of sensory axons in the spinal cord. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 11585–11590.Find this resource:

Hensler, J. G. (2006). Serotonergic modulation of the limbic system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 203–214.Find this resource:

Hou, S., Duale, H., & Rabchevsky, A. G. (2009). Intraspinal sprouting of unmyelinated pelvic afferents after complete spinal cord injury is correlated with autonomic dysreflexia induced by visceral pain. Neuroscience, 159(1), 369–379.Find this resource:

Jones, S. L., & Light, A. R. (1990). Termination patterns of serotoninergic medullary raphespinal fibers in the rat lumbar spinal cord: An anterograde immunohistochemical study. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 297, 267–282.Find this resource:

Joosten, E. A., Schuitman, R. L., Vermelis, M. E., & Dederen, P. J. (1992). Postnatal development of the ipsilateral corticospinal component in rat spinal cord: A light and electron microscopic anterograde HRP study. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 326, 133–146.Find this resource:

Kakulas, B. A. (2004). Neuropathology: The foundation for new treatments in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 42(10), 549–563.Find this resource:

Kim, J. E., Liu, B. P., Park, J. H., & Strittmatter, S. M. (2004). Nogo-66 receptor prevents raphespinal and rubrospinal axon regeneration and limits functional recovery from spinal cord injury. Neuron, 44, 439–451.Find this resource:

Krenz, N. R., & Weaver, L. C. (1998). Sprouting of primary afferent fibers after spinal cord transection in the rat. Neuroscience, 85(2), 443–458.Find this resource:

Krukoff, T. L., Ciriello, J., & Calaresu, F. R. (1985). Segmental distribution of peptide- and 5HT-like immunoreactivity in nerve terminals and fibers of the thoracolumbar sympathetic nuclei of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 240, 103–116.Find this resource:

Lallemend, F., & Emfors, P. (2012). Molecular interactions underlying the specification of sensory neurons. Trends in Neuroscience, 35, 373–381.Find this resource:

Lemon, R. N. (2008). Descending pathways in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 195–218.Find this resource:

Lewis, L. J., & Brookhart, J. M. (1951). Significance of the crossed phrenic phenomenon. American Journal of Physiology, 166, 241–254.Find this resource:

Liang, H., Wang, S., Francis, R., Whan, R., Watson, C., & Paxinos, G. (2015). Distribution of raphespinal fibers in the mouse spinal cord. Molecular Pain, 11, 42.Find this resource:

Liu, K., Tedeschi, A., Park, K. K., & He, Z. (2011). Neuronal intrinsic mechanisms of axon regeneration. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 131–152.Find this resource:

Luedtke, K., Bouchard, S. M., Woller, S. A., Funk, M. K., Aceves, M., & Hook, M. A. (2014). Assessment of depression in a rodent model of spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 31, 1107–1121.Find this resource:

Maldonado-Bouchard, S., Peters, K., Woller, S. A., Madahian, B., Faghihi, U., Patel, S., . . . Hook, M. A. (2016). Inflammation is increased with anxiety- and depression-like signs in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 51, 176–195.Find this resource:

Manohar, A., Foffani, G., Ganzer, P. D., Bethea, J. R., & Moxon, K. A. (2017). Cortex-dependent recovery of unassisted hindlimb locomotion after complete spinal cord injury in adult rats. eLife, 6.Find this resource:

Maragakis, N. J., & Rothstein, J. D. (2004). Glutamate transporters: Animal models to neurologic disease. Neurobiology of Disease, 15, 461–473.Find this resource:

Martinez, M., & Rossignol, S. (2013). A dual spinal cord lesion paradigm to study spinal locomotor plasticity in the cat. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1279, 127–134.Find this resource:

Mason, P. (2001). Contributions of the medullary raphe and ventromedial reticular region to pain modulation and other homeostatic functions. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 737–777.Find this resource:

Masri, R., Quiton, R. L., Lucas, J. M., Murray, P. D., Thompson, S. M., & Keller, A. (2009). Zona incerta: A role in central pain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 181–191.Find this resource:

Matsuzaki, S., Takada, M., Li, Y. Q., Tokuno, H., & Mizuno, N. (1993). Serotoninergic projections from the dorsal raphe nucleus to the nucleus submedius in the rat and cat. Neuroscience, 55, 403–416.Find this resource:

May, Z., Fenrich, K. K., Dahlby, J., Batty, N. J., Torres-Espin, A., & Fouad, K. (2017). Following spinal cord injury transected reticulospinal tract axons develop new collateral inputs to spinal interneurons in parallel with locomotor recovery. Neural Plasticity, 2017 (1932875).Find this resource:

Metz, G. A., Dietz, V., Schwab, M. E., & van de Meent, H. (1998). The effects of unilateral pyramidal tract section on hindlimb motor performance in the rat. Behavioural Brain Research, 96, 37–46.Find this resource:

Molander, C., Hongpaisan, J., & Persson, J. K. (1994). Distribution of c-fos expressing dorsal horn neuron after electrical stimulation of low threshold sensory fibers in the chronically injured sciatic nerve. Brain Research, 644(1), 74–82.Find this resource:

Moreno, D. E., Yu, X. J., & Goshgarian, H. G. (1992). Identification of the axon pathways which mediate functional recovery of a paralyzed hemidiaphragm following spinal cord hemisection in the adult rat. Experimental Neurology, 116, 219–228.Find this resource:

Moxon, K. A., Oliviero, A., Aguilar, J., & Foffani, G. (2014). Cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury: Always for good? Neuroscience, 283, 78–94.Find this resource:

Nantwi, K. D., El-Bohy, A. A., Schrimsher, G. W., Reier, P. J., & Goshgarian, H. G. (1999). Spontaneous functional recovery in a paralyzed hemidiaphragm following upper cervical spinal cord injury in adult rats. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 13, 225–234.Find this resource:

Nestler, E., & Carlezon, W. A., Jr. (2006). The mesolimbic dopamine reward circuit in depression. Biological Psychiatry, 59, 1151–1159.Find this resource:

Nitzan-Luques, A., Devo, A. M., & Tal, M. (2011). Genotype-selective phenotypic switch in primary afferent neurons contributes to neuropathic pain. Pain, 152(10), 2413–2426.Find this resource:

Nitzan-Luques, A., Minert, A., Devor, M., & Tal, M. (2013). Dynamic genotype-selective “phenotypic switching” of CGRP expression contributes to differential neuropathic pain phenotype. Experimental Neurology, 250, 194–204.Find this resource:

Ondarza, A. B., Ye, Z., & Hulsebosch, C. E. (2003). Direct evidence of primary afferent sprouting in distant segments following spinal cord injury in the rat: colocalization of GAP-43 and CGRP. Experimental Neurology, 184(1), 373–380.Find this resource:

Onifer, S. M., Smith, G. M., & Fouad, K. (2011). Plasticity after spinal cord injury: Relevance to recovery and approaches to facilitate it. Neurotherapeutics, 8, 283–293.Find this resource:

Padmanabhan, J., Park, D. S., Greene, L. A., & Shelanski, M. L. (1999). Role of cell cycle regulatory proteins in cerebellar granule neuron apoptosis. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 8747–8756.Find this resource:

Pitt, D., Nagelmeier, I. E., Wilson, H. C., & Raine, C. S. (2003). Glutamate uptake by oligodendrocytes: Implications for excitotoxicity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 61, 1113–1120.Find this resource:

Popovich, P. G., Guan, Z., Wei, P., Huitinga, I., van Rooijen, N., & Stokes, B. T. (1999). Depletion of hematogenous macrophages promotes partial hindlimb recovery and neuroanatomical repair after experimental spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology, 158, 351–365.Find this resource:

Porter, W. T. (1895). The path of the respiratory impulse from the bulb to the phrenic nuclei. Journal of Physiology, 17, 455–485.Find this resource:

Prakash, Y. S., Mantilla, C. B., Zhan, W. Z., Smithson, K. G., & Sieck, G. C. (2000). Phrenic motoneuron morphology during rapid diaphragm muscle growth. Journal of Applied Physiology, 89, 563–572.Find this resource:

Pribiag, H., & Stellwagen, D. (2013). TNF-alpha downregulates inhibitory neurotransmission through protein phosphatase 1-dependent trafficking of GABA(A) receptors. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 15879–15893.Find this resource:

Price, T. J., & Dussor, G. (2014). Evolution: The advantage of “maladaptive” pain plasticity. Current Biology, 24, R384–386.Find this resource:

Raineteau, O., Fouad, K., Noth, P., Thallmair, M., & Schwab, M. E. (2001). Functional switch between motor tracts in the presence of the mAb IN-1 in the adult rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 6929–6934.Find this resource:

Raineteau, O., & Schwab, M. E. (2001). Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 263–273.Find this resource:

Reed, W. R., Shum-Siu, A., & Magnuson, D. S. (2008). Reticulospinal pathways in the ventrolateral funiculus with terminations in the cervical and lumbar enlargements of the adult rat spinal cord. Neuroscience, 151, 505–517.Find this resource:

Roelcke, U., Curt, A., Otte, A., Missimer, J., Maguire, R. P., Dietz, V., & Leenders, K. L. (1997). Influence of spinal cord injury on cerebral sensorimotor systems: A PET study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 62, 61–65.Find this resource:

Rossignol, S. (2017). Plasticity of stepping rhythms in the intact and injured mammalian spinal cord. In S. M. Sherman (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of neuroscience. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Rossignol, S., & Frigon, A. (2011). Recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury: Some facts and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 413–440.Find this resource:

Rossignol, S., Frigon, A., Barriere, G., Martinez, M., Barthelemy, D., Bouyer, L., . . . Alluin, O. (2011). Spinal plasticity in the recovery of locomotion. Progress in Brain Research, 188, 229–241.Find this resource:

Sachdeva, R., Theisen, C. C., Ninan, V., Twiss, J. L., & Houle, J. D. (2016). Exercise dependent increase into peripheral nerve grafts by proprispinal but not sensory neurons after spinal cord injury is associated with modulation of regeneration-associated genes, Experimental Neurology, 276, 72–82.Find this resource:

Sandrow, H. R., Shumsky, J. S., Amin, A., & Houle, J. D. (2008). Aspiration of a cervical spinal contusion injury in preparation for delayed peripheral nerve grafting does not impair forelimb behavior or axon regeneration. Experimental Neurology, 210, 489–500.Find this resource:

Saruhashi Y., Young, W., & Perkins, R. (1996). The recovery of 5-HT immunoreactivity in lumbosacral spinal cord and locomotor function after thoracic hemisection. Experimental Neurology, 139, 203–213.Find this resource:

Schmidt, B., & Jordan, L. M. (2000). The role of serotonin in reflex modulation and locomotor rhythm production in the mammalian spinal cord. Brain Research Bulletin, 53, 689–710.Find this resource:

Schwab, J. M., Zhang, Y., Kopp, M. A., Brommer, B., & Popovich, P. G. (2014). The paradox of chronic neuroinflammation, systemic immune suppression, autoimmunity after traumatic chronic spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology, 258, 121–129.Find this resource:

Shortland, P., & Woolf, C. J. (1993). Chronic peripheral nerve section results in a rearrangement of the central axonal arborizations of axotomized A beta primary afferent neurons in the rat spinal cord. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 330(1), 65–82.Find this resource:

Shortland, P., Woolf, C. J., & Fitzgerald, M. (1989). Morphology and somatotopic organization of the central terminals of hindlimb hair follicle afferents in the rat lumbar spinal cord. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 289(3), 416–433.Find this resource:

Siebert, J. R., Middleton, F. A., & Stelzner, D. J. (2010). Long descending cervical propriospinal neurons differ from thoracic propriospinal neurons in response to low thoracic spinal injury. BMC Neuroscience, 11, 69.Find this resource:

Siegel, C. S., Fink, K. L., Strittmatter, S. M., & Cafferty, W. B. (2015). Plasticity of intact rubral projections mediates spontaneous recovery of function after corticospinal tract injury. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 1443–1457.Find this resource:

Sperry, M. A., & Goshgarian, H. G. (1993). Ultrastructural changes in the rat phrenic nucleus developing within 2 h after cervical spinal cord hemisection. Experimental Neurology, 120, 233–244.Find this resource:

Steinbusch, H. W. (1981). Distribution of serotonin-immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the rat-cell bodies and terminals. Neuroscience, 6, 557–618.Find this resource:

Steward, O. (2014). Degenerative changes and reactive growth responses of neurons following denervation and axotomy: Historical concepts and their modern embodiments. In M. E. Selzer, S. Clarke, L. G. Cohen, G. Kwakkel, & R. H. Miller (Eds.), Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Stuck, E. D., Christensen, R. N., Huie, J. R., Tovar, C. A., Miller, B. A., Nout, Y. S., . . . Ferguson, A. R. (2012). Tumor necrosis factor alpha mediates GABA(A) receptor trafficking to the plasma membrane of spinal cord neurons in vivo. Neural Plasticity, 2012, 261345.Find this resource:

Tai, Q., & Goshgarian, H. G. (1996). Ultrastructural quantitative analysis of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic terminals in the phrenic nucleus after spinal cord injury. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 372, 343–355.Find this resource:

Vahlsing, H. L., & Feringa, E. R. (1980). A ventral uncrossed corticospinal tract in the rat. Experimental Neurology, 70, 282–287.Find this resource:

Vinit, S., Darlot, F., Stamegna, J. C., Sanchez, P., Gauthier, P., & Kastner, A. (2008). Long-term reorganization of respiratory pathways after partial cervical spinal cord injury. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 897–908.Find this resource:

Vinit, S., Gauthier, P., Stamegna, J. C., & Kastner, A. (2006). High cervical lateral spinal cord injury results in long-term ipsilateral hemidiaphragm paralysis. Journal of Neurotrauma, 23, 1137–1146.Find this resource:

Vinit, S., Stamegna, J. C., Boulenguez, P., Gauthier, P., & Kastner, A. (2007). Restorative respiratory pathways after partial cervical spinal cord injury: Role of ipsilateral phrenic afferents. European Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3551–3560.Find this resource:

Weaver, L. C., Verghese, P., Bruce, J. C., Fehlings, M. G., Krenz, N. R., & Marsh, D. R. (2001). Autonomic dysreflexia and primary afferent sprouting after clip-compression injury of the rat spinal cord. Journal of Neurotrauma, 18(10), 1107–1119.Find this resource:

Weidner, N., Ner, A., Salimi, N., & Tuszynski, M. H. (2001). Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 3513–3518.Find this resource:

Woolf, C. J. (1983). Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature, 306(5944), 686–688.Find this resource:

Woolf, C. J., & Costigan, M. (1999). Transcriptional and posttranslational plasticity and the generation of inflammatory pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(14), 7723–7730.Find this resource:

Woolf, C. J., Shortland, P., & Coggeshall, R. E. (1992). Peripheral nerve injury triggers central sprouting of myelinated afferents. Nature, 355(6355), 75–78.Find this resource:

Woolf, C. J., & Walters, E. T. (1991). Common patterns of plasticity contributing to nociceptive sensitization in mammals and Aplysia. Trends in Neuroscience, 14(2), 74–78.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2013). International perspectives on spinal cord injury (J. Bickenbach, Ed.). Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization.Find this resource:

Wu, J., Stoica, B. A., & Faden, A. I. (2011). Cell cycle activation and spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics, 8, 221–228.Find this resource:

Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Kumar, A., Lipinski, M. M., Loane, D. J., Stoica, B. A., & Faden, A. I. (2016). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and disrupted neurogenesis in the brain are associated with cognitive impairment and depressive-like behavior after spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 33, 1919–1935.Find this resource:

Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Sabirzhanov, B., Stoica, B. A., Kumar, A., Luo, T., . . . Faden, A. I. (2014). Spinal cord injury causes brain inflammation associated with cognitive and affective changes: Role of cell cycle pathways. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 10989–11006.Find this resource:

Yiu, G., & He, Z. (2006). Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 617–627.Find this resource:

Zaporozhets, E., Cowley, K. C., & Schmidt, B. J. (2006). Propriospinal neurons contribute to bulbospinal transmission of the locomotor command signal in the neonatal rat spinal cord. Journal of Physiology, 572, 443–458.Find this resource:

Zimmer, M. B., & Goshgarian, H. G. (2007). GABA, not glycine, mediates inhibition of latent respiratory motor pathways after spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology, 203, 493–501.Find this resource:

Zorner, B., Bachmann, L. C., Filli, L., Kapitza, S., Gullo, M., Bolliger, M., . . . Schwab, M. E. (2014). Chasing central nervous system plasticity: The brainstem’s contribution to locomotor recovery in rats with spinal cord injury. Brain, 137, 1716–1732.Find this resource:

Zou, J. Y., & Crews, F. T. (2005). TNF alpha potentiates glutamate neurotoxicity by inhibiting glutamate uptake in organotypic brain slice cultures: Neuroprotection by NF kappa B inhibition. Brain Research, 1034, 11–24.Find this resource: