Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Planetary Science. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 11 December 2024

Defining Planetslocked

Defining Planetslocked

  • Mark V. Sykes, Mark V. SykesPlanetary Science Institute
  • Elisabeth Adams, Elisabeth AdamsPlanetary Science Institute
  • Kirby Runyon, Kirby RunyonPlanetary Science Institute
  • S. Alan SternS. Alan SternSouthwest Research Institute
  • , and Philip T. MetzgerPhilip T. MetzgerUniversity of Central Florida

Summary

For religious institutions in Latin western Europe of the 16th century, Earth was the center of the universe, and the orderly and predictable motion of the heavenly planets about the Earth (which included the Sun) reflected divine will and an inducement to moral improvement. The discovery by Copernicus that the Earth was not at the center of the universe, but was itself a planet orbiting the Sun, was revolutionary. The invention of the telescope resulted in the discovery of more planets by Galileo and others, initially thought to be planets orbiting planets. All planets were expected to feature geological processes seen on Earth. It was even speculated that these other worlds also supported intelligent life.

The search for and discovery of a predicted “missing planet” at the beginning of the 19th century opened the door to a rapidly growing number of new small planets, which appeared as points of light in the sky, and were also referred to as “asteroids,” meaning “star-like.” All planets at this time, which then included asteroids, were thought to have formed from a disk of nebular dust and gas surrounding the early Sun. While in the 19th century it was thought by some that asteroids may have arisen from the breakup of a larger planet, it was not until the 1950s when the smaller members of this population were shown to be collisional fragments that there was a paradigm shift in the scientific literature away from their being considered a type of planet.

Near the end of the 20th century, planets around other stars were discovered. These planets now number in the many thousands, greatly expanding the diversity of planet characteristics and solar system architectures. Since then, a growing number of small planets have been discovered in the Solar System (often referred to as ice dwarfs), many of which are hypothesized to have or have had subsurface oceans. Dwarfs are also satellites of planets. Ice dwarfs are the most common type of planet in the Solar System and are hypothesized to be the most common type of planet around other stars. If life can arise in subsurface oceans of these worlds, it raises the question of whether life might be common in the universe.

The use of the term “planet” today in the scientific literature continues to reflect its heritage from the time of Galileo, that is, planets are geophysical objects, regardless of their orbits. So, by definition, planets would be those objects large enough to be gravitationally round, in generally hydrostatic equilibrium, at which point differentiation commences and geophysical processes, similar to those observed on Earth, are observed to “turn on.”

Subjects

  • Extrasolar Planets and Systems
  • History of Ideas about Planets and Planetary Systems

You do not currently have access to this article

Login

Please login to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription