Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Politics. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 26 June 2022

Comparative Abortion Law and Politicslocked

Comparative Abortion Law and Politicslocked

  • Udi SommerUdi SommerSchool of Political Science, Government, and International Affairs, Tel Aviv University
  •  and Aliza Forman-RabinoviciAliza Forman-RabinoviciSchool of Political Science, Government, and International Affairs, Tel Aviv University

Summary

Public debate rages around the world as to if and when a woman has a right to access abortion services. Though abortion policy has become more permissive over time in various places, there are still many countries with severe restrictions. The variety in state abortion policies at the state and regional levels reflects the different religious, cultural, and political attitudes toward this issue.

Literature on this topic engages with larger theoretical debates within the study of public policy. That includes definitions of morality policy and determinants of feminist policy. Researchers continue to search for the ideal way to compare permissiveness of abortion policy in light of the extensive variation, conditions, and caveats that exist within abortion legislation. A number of variables, including female political representation, dominant religious groups in the country, and women’s movements have emerged as central correlates with permissiveness of abortion policy. The difference between de jure abortion law and de facto access also constitutes an important part of abortion policy research.

Subjects

  • Policy, Administration, and Bureaucracy
  • Political Values, Beliefs, and Ideologies
  • Politics, Law, Judiciary

You do not currently have access to this article

Login

Please login to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription