Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Politics. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 25 June 2022

The Anthropology of Bureaucracy and Public Administrationlocked

The Anthropology of Bureaucracy and Public Administrationlocked

  • Thomas BierschenkThomas BierschenkDepartment of Anthropology and African Studies, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
  •  and Jean-Pierre Olivier de SardanJean-Pierre Olivier de SardanLASDEL: Laboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Dynamiques Sociales et le Développement, and Department of Anthropology, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes

Summary

Anthropology is a latecomer to the study of bureaucracy. Nonetheless, the anthropological study of organizations—of which bureaucracies are a subtype, as larger organizations are always bureaucratically organized—was initiated by anthropologists as early as the 1920s. Since the 2010s, the anthropology of bureaucracy has slowly consolidated into a discernible subfield of the discipline. It brings to the study of public administrations a double added value: (a) a specific concern for the informal aspects of bureaucracy, (b) the emic views of bureaucratic actors and their pragmatic contexts, based on long-term immersion in the research field, as well as (c) a non-Eurocentric, global comparative perspective. Anthropologists have focused on bureaucratic actors (“bureaucrats”), the discursive, relational, and material contexts in which they work, the public policies they are supposed to implement or to comply with, and their interactions with the outside world, in particular ordinary citizens (“clients”). A foundational theorem of the anthropological study of bureaucracies has been that you cannot understand organizations on the basis of their official structures alone: the actual workings of an organization are largely based on informal practices and practical rules; there is always a gap between organizational norms and “real” practices; large-scale organizations are heterogeneous phenomena; and conflicts, negotiations, alliances, and power relations are their core components. Thus, one of the major methodological achievements of the anthropology of bureaucracy has been to focus on the dialectics of formal organization and real practices, official regulations, and informal norms in organizations “at work.”

Subjects

  • Policy, Administration, and Bureaucracy
  • Political Anthropology
  • Qualitative Political Methodology

You do not currently have access to this article

Login

Please login to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription