Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Politics. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 28 January 2021

Analyzing Mega-Disaster Hurricane Katrinalocked

  • Arjen Boin, Arjen BoinDepartment of Public Institutions and Governance, Leiden University
  • Christer BrownChrister BrownEuropean Commission
  •  and James A. RichardsonJames A. RichardsonPublic Administration Institute, Louisiana State University

Summary

The response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 has been widely described as a disaster in itself. Politicians, media, academics, survivors, and the public at large have slammed the federal, state, and local response to this mega disaster. According to the critics, the response was late, ineffective, politically charged, and even influenced by racist motives. But is this criticism true? Was the response really that poor? This article offers a framework for the analysis and assessment of a large-scale response to a mega disaster, which is then applied to the Katrina response (with an emphasis on New Orleans). The article identifies some failings (where the response could and should have been better) but also points to successes that somehow got lost in the politicized aftermath of this disaster. The article demonstrates the importance of a proper framework based on insights from crisis management studies.

You do not currently have access to this article

Login

Please login to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription