Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Global Public Health. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 16 June 2024

Sexual and Reproductive Health in Indiafree

Sexual and Reproductive Health in Indiafree

  • Shireen Jejeebhoy, Shireen JejeebhoyDirector, Aksha Centre for Equity and Wellbeing
  • K. G. SanthyaK. G. SanthyaSenior Associate, Population Council
  •  and A. J. Francis ZavierA. J. Francis ZavierSenior Program Officer, Population Council


India has demonstrated its commitment to improving the sexual and reproductive health of its population. Its policy and program environment has shifted from a narrow focus on family planning to a broader orientation that stresses sexual and reproductive health and the exercise of rights. Significant strides have been made. The total fertility rate is 2.2 (2015–2016) and has reached replacement level in 18 of its 29 states. The age structure places the country in the advantageous position of being able to reap the demographic dividend. Maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortality have declined, child marriage has declined steeply, contraceptive use and skilled attendance at delivery have increased, and HIV prevalence estimates suggest that the situation is not as dire as assumed earlier.

Yet there is a long way to go. Notwithstanding impressive improvements, pregnancy-related outcomes, both in terms of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, remain unacceptably high. Postpartum care eludes many women. Contraceptive practice patterns reflect a continued focus on female sterilization, limited use of male methods, limited use of non-terminal methods, and persisting unmet need. The overwhelming majority of abortions take place outside of legally sanctioned provider and facility structures. Over one-quarter of young women continues to marry in childhood. Comprehensive sexuality education reaches few adolescents, and in general, sexual and reproductive health promoting information needs are poorly met. Access to and quality of services, as well as the exercise of informed choice are far from optimal. Inequities are widespread, and certain geographies, as well as the poor, the rural, the young, and the socially excluded are notably disadvantaged. Moving forward and, in particular, achieving national goals and SDGs 3 and 5 require multi-pronged efforts to accelerate the pace of change in all of these dimensions of health and rights.


  • Sexual and Reproductive Health


Over the course of the 21st century, India has seen momentous and multi-dimensional changes in its population and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) situation. As of its 2011 census, India’s population was 1.21 billion, and its decadal growth rate had declined more sharply over the 2001–2011 decade than in earlier decades (Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, 2013). The total fertility rate is now 2.2 and has reached replacement level in 18 of its 29 states (IIPS & ICF, 2017), and its age structure places the country in the advantageous position of being able to reap the demographic dividend (Kulkarni, 2014). The policy and program environment has shifted from a narrow focus on family planning to a broader orientation that stresses SRH and the exercise of reproductive rights. Sexual and reproductive health has improved in many ways. Yet, India may not meet several of the milestones set by Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 3 and 5.

This article reviews what is known about India’s SRH situation and highlights remaining challenges that must be overcome to accelerate the pace of improvement in this situation.

A Brief Overview of Key Policies and Programs Addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health

There have been several policies, laws, and programs in the area of SRH that have been introduced over the course of the 21st century. Table 1 briefly describes selected key policies and programs and outline their prescriptions that are particularly relevant for SRH.

Table 1. Key Policies and Programs Addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health

Policy and Programs


SRH-Related Goals and Objectives

Key Strategies

National Health Policy (NHP) 2017 (MOHFW, 2017a)

Attain the highest possible level of health and wellbeing for all at all ages, and universal access to good-quality health care services

Reach by 2025

Total fertility rate of 2.1

Neonatal mortality rate of 16

Under 5 mortality rate of 23

Infant mortality rate of 28

Single digit stillbirth rate

Maternal mortality rate of 100

Antenatal care for >90% of pregnant women

>90% skilled attendance at delivery

>90% full immunization for infants

>90% met need for family planning

90:90:90 for HIV/AIDS by 2020 (90% of all people living with HIV know their HIV status, 90% of all people diagnosed with HIV infection receive sustained antiretroviral therapy, and 90% of all people receiving antiretroviral therapy will have viral suppression.)

Strengthen health system

Increase health expenditure from 1.15% to 2.5% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

Direct 2/3 of health expenditure to primary health care

Upgrade primary health centers and sub-centers to Health and Wellness Centers (HWCs) to provide comprehensive primary health care including SRH

Ayushman Bharat (Healthy India) initiative 2018 (MOHFW, n.d.a)

Translate NHP 2017 into action

Goals and objectives articulated for NHP 2017

Transform and upgrade 1,50,000 existing health sub-centers into HWCs

Strengthen outreach services

Expand access to referral, essential drugs, and diagnostic services

Upgrade the skills of health care providers, including ASHAs

Provide financial protection for secondary and tertiary care for about 40% of the households

National Health Mission 2013 (Amalgamated National Rural Health Mission and National Urban Health Mission) (MOHFW, n.d.b)

Achieve universal access to equitable, affordable, and quality health care services accountable and responsive to people’s needs

Reach by 2017

MMR of 100/100,000 live births

IMR of 25/1,000 live births

TFR of 2.1

Prevention/reduction of anemia in women aged 15–49 years

Strengthen reproductive, maternal, newborn, child health, and adolescent services

Establish a new cadre of frontline workers, ASHAs

Introduce social protection schemes: conditional cash transfers for institutional delivery; in-kind support for women and their newborns

National Youth Policy 2014 (Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, 2014)

Empower youth aged 15–29 to reach its full potential

Develop a strong and healthy generation

Improve access to health services

Targeted health awareness program

Targeted disease control program for youth

Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karykram 2014 (MOHFW, 2014)

Enable all adolescents to realize their full potential by making informed and responsible decisions related to their health and wellbeing, and by accessing the services and support they need to do so

Improve health-promoting knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to SRH

Reduce adolescent pregnancy

Improve birth preparedness and a safe transition into pregnancy and parenthood

Prevent gender-based violence (GBV)

Establish or strengthen adolescent-friendly health clinics

Community-based peer education program

Supply commodities—weekly iron and folic supplements, sanitary napkins

Sensitize parents

Building the capacity of frontline workers and other health care providers to address the needs of adolescents

National Policy on Women (Draft) 2016 (Ministry of Women and Child Development, 2016)

Allow women to attain their full potential and participate as equal partners in all spheres of life

Reduce maternal and infant mortality rates

Recognize women’s reproductive rights and reduce the reliance on sterilization as a key method of family planning

Improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health

Provide health coverage to surrogate mothers

Address all forms of violence against women

Strategies yet to be formulated

The Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Bill, 2017 (MOHFW, 2017b)

Prevent misuse of ART and ensure safe and ethical practice of ART services

Oversee the implementation of ART

Establish national and state boards to regulate ART services

Develop standards, regulations and guidelines on ART clinics and services

The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019 (MOHFW, 2019)

Ensure that surrogacy does not violate rights

Regulate eligibility criteria for surrogacy clients, as well as surrogates

Establish eligibility criteria

Require stringent reporting

Note: Many other policies, laws, and programs launched prior to 2010, relating to population, child marriage, AIDS, abortion, and more, are not described in the table.

In short, India has a plethora of policies, laws, and programs that are intended directly or indirectly to influence sexual and reproductive health and rights. Unfortunately, lacunae exist, and the limited reach and quality of program delivery, along with many demand side obstacles and limited allocation of resources, have thwarted the pace of improvement in India’s sexual and reproductive health situation. In many instances, goals have been set and strategies identified without adequate political commitment, and without a clear roadmap for action. Priorities tend to shift, and there is a risk that sexual and reproductive health and rights will be overshadowed by such currently stated priorities as health insurance, cleanliness, and open defecation free drives, the national nutrition mission, and even a recent resurgence of concerns about “population explosion” and the need to disincentivize those with more than two children.

The Sexual and Reproductive Health Situation

Maternal and Newborn Health

Maternal Mortality and Morbidity

The maternal mortality ratio has declined over the course of the 21st century, from 301 per 100,000 births in 2001–2003 to 130 by 2014–2016 (Office of the Registrar General, India, 2006, 2018). While this ratio has declined impressively throughout the country over the 21st century, it must decline much further, to 70 by 2030, if India is to meet its SDG3 commitment (Niti Aayog, 2018).

Figure 1. Maternal mortality ratio: India, EAG*, Assam, southern states, and other states (Office of the Registrar General, India, 2006, 2011, 2013, 2018, n.d.).

Note: *Empowered Action Group (EAG), comprises eight lesser developed states (Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand).

Data on causes of maternal death are unfortunately dated. Available data, from the early 2000s, suggest that common causes of maternal death are those seen in most low- and middle-income country settings (hemorrhage, sepsis, unsafe abortions, obstructed labor, and hypertensive disorders), and are largely preventable (Registrar General of India, 2006).

The real burden of maternal morbidity is poorly known, although it is accepted that for every maternal death, 20–30 others experience pregnancy-related morbidity (Firoz et al., 2013). Data on self-reported morbidity, although more unreliable than medical records, show that one in five women aged 15–49 who had delivered in the five years preceding the National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4 had experienced massive vaginal bleeding and 15% reported the experience of very high fever within two months of their most recent delivery (IIPS & ICF, 2017). Estimates of morbidity using provider-assessed methods tend to be lower than those, such as the NFHS surveys, that rely on women’s own reports of morbidity. For example, Iyengar (2012) followed up in rural Rajasthan almost 5,000 women in their first week postpartum and measured morbidity using a structured checklist and found that 7% suffered from severe anemia, 4% with fever, and 5% from perineal conditions. Overall, 7.6% were assessed with a life-threatening condition (severe anemia, puerperal sepsis, severe hypertension, and secondary postpartum hemorrhage).

Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity

Both neonatal and perinatal mortality are, to a considerable extent, the result of inadequate or inappropriate care during pregnancy, childbirth, or the first critical hours after birth, and India has witnessed impressive declines in both. The neonatal mortality rate declined from 49 per 1,000 births for the five years preceding NFHS-1 in 1992–1993 to 30 per 1,000 births for the five years preceding NFHS-4 in 2015–2016, and as of 2015–2016, accounted for almost three-quarters of all infant deaths over this period (IIPS & ICF, 2017). A similar picture is evident for perinatal mortality which had reached 36 per 1,000 pregnancies of seven or more months duration in 2015–2016, down from 48.5 per 1,000 such pregnancies in 2005–2006 (IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007).

Table 2. Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality Rates, 1992–1993 to 2015–2016, India

Perinatal Mortality Rate

Neonatal Mortality Rate (NNMR)

Infant Mortality Rate

1992–1993 (NFHS1)

Not available



1998–1999 (NFHS2)

Not available



2005–2006 (NFHS3)




2015–2016 (NFHS4)




Sources: IIPS (1995); IIPS & ORC Macro (2000); IIPS & Macro International (2007); IIPS & ICF (2017).

Major identifiable causes of neonatal mortality include neonatal infections (pneumonia, tetanus, sepsis, and diarrhea), prematurity, and birth asphyxia (Paul, Sachdev, Mavalankar, Ramachandran, & Kirkwood, 2011). Findings from the Million Death Survey over the 2000–2015 period show that while these conditions continued to be prominent in 2015, there had been a sharp decline in each over the 2000–2015 period. The neonatal mortality rate from infections (mainly pneumonia and sepsis) fell from 11.9 per 1,000 live births in 2000 to 4.0 by 2015, and from birth asphyxia and trauma fell from 9.0 to 2.2. In contrast, prematurity or low birth weight mortality rates rose from 12.3 to 14.3 deaths per 1,000 live births. While declines in mortality from infections and birth asphyxia or trauma fell in both rural and urban areas and in both poorer and wealthier states, prematurity or low birth weight mortality increased in rural areas and in poorer states but fell in urban areas and wealthier states, pointing to vast differences across states in modifiable factors such as antenatal care, education, and nutrition for example (Million Death Study Collaborators, 2017).

Maternal and Newborn Health Care Utilization

Pregnancy-related health care utilization increased modestly in the 1990s, and then steeply ever since (Table 3). Remarkable increases were noted in the 2005–2006 to 2015–2016 period, that is, in the period following the introduction of the safe motherhood initiative, namely the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY). The percentage of pregnant women who had availed of four or more antenatal check-ups increased from 37 in 2005–2006 to 51 by 2015–2016, and those receiving two or more doses of tetanus toxoid increased from 76 to 84 in the same period. Care was more comprehensive, and by 2015–2016, 88–93% of those who received antenatal services reported that they had been weighted, their blood pressure measured, a urine sample tested, and an abdominal examination conducted (compared to 58–72% in the 2000s). Institutional deliveries and skilled attendance at delivery increased enormously, from 39% to 79%, and 47% to 81%, respectively. While fewer women obtained postpartum care even in 2015–2016, because of the increase in institutional delivery, a far larger percentage had done so in 2015–2016 than in the 2000s (from 41% to 69%). Finally, while far more women had been counseled about danger signals in 2015–2016 than in earlier years, percentages were far from universal.

Table 3. Pregnancy-Related Care: The Situation 1992–1993 to 2009





Antenatal care

Women receiving any antenatal check-ups





Pregnant women receiving at least four antenatal check-ups





Pregnant women receiving antenatal check-up in the first trimester





Pregnant women receiving two or more doses of tetanus-toxoid





Intrapartum care

Women who delivered in a health facility or institution





Women who delivered in a public sector facility or institution





Women whose delivery was attended by trained health personnel





Postpartum care

Women who received a postpartum check-up within two days of delivery





Pregnancy-related information provided

Women who were told about specific signs of pregnancy complications (vaginal bleeding, convulsions, prolonged labor, severe abdominal pain, and high blood pressure)





Women who were told where to go if pregnancy complications experienced





1 Sources: IIPS (1995);

2 IIPS & ORC Macro (2000);

3 IIPS & Macro International (2007);

4 IIPS % ICF (2017); refers to women aged 15–49 with a birth in the three to five years preceding the survey.

Along with the spurt in institutional delivery, there has also been a significant shift from private to public sector deliveries following the introduction of the JSY program. While fewer than half of all institutional deliveries had taken place in public sector facilities in 1998–1999 and 2005–2006, the situation had reversed by 2015–2016, at which time about two-thirds of institutional deliveries were conducted in the public sector (IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007).

Family Planning Practices and Unmet Need

Contraceptive use has been increasing in India. However, there continues to be substantial unmet need for contraception, particularly among the young, and the method mix remains skewed toward sterilization, and the shift toward non-terminal methods is not yet apparent.

Family Planning Use and Method Mix

Contraceptive use increased by some 15 percentage points from 1992–1993 to 2005–2006, and has remained fairly steady at 54–56% over the subsequent decade (IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007). Although efforts have been made to move the Indian family planning program away from its singular focus on sterilization to a more client-centric and rights-based approach that promotes informed choice and the use of non-terminal methods, contraceptive use patterns continue to be dominated by female sterilization. More than one-third of current contraceptive users in 2015–2016 had adopted sterilization, and sterilization accounted for three-quarters of all modern methods used (Table 4). Non-terminal method use remains limited, and has increased only modestly in the past 25 years—the percentage of women using oral contraceptives increased from 1% to 4%, those reporting condom use increased from 2% to 6%, and intra uterine device (IUD) use remained stagnant at 2%.

Table 4. Trends in Current Contraceptive Use, 1992–1993 to 2015–2016





Any method





Any traditional method





Any modern method





Female sterilization





Male sterilization





Oral contraceptives

























Percentage of non-terminal modern of all modern method use





Sources:IIPS (1995); IIPS & ICF (2017); IIPS & Macro International (2007); IIPS & ORC Macro (2000).

Use of male methods is limited. Together, male sterilization and condom use was reported by just 6% in 2015–2016, and has remained stagnant since the mid-1990s.

Contraceptive prevalence continues to vary considerably by state. Percentages of women reporting any form of contraception in 2015–2016 ranged from 23% in Bihar to 70% in Andhra Pradesh. Although female sterilization continued to be the leading modern method used in every state, the method mix also varied considerably across states. In Andhra Pradesh, for example, just 1% of all women used a non-terminal modern method or a traditional method. In contrast, in West Bengal, 28% of all women used a non-terminal modern method and 13% used a traditional method. Among male methods, vasectomy was rarely reported (<2%) and condom use ranged from 1% in Tamil Nadu to 19% in Punjab. Differentials in contraceptive use patterns were evident with regard to various socio-demographic factors. Modern method use increased systematically from 36% among the poorest women to 53% among the wealthiest. It increased from 1% and 27% among those with no children or one living child to 67% among those with three children; at each parity, those without sons were far less likely than those with one or more sons to practice contraception. Moreover, contraceptive use ranged from 38% among Muslim women to 49% among Hindu women. Disparities by caste and women’s education were not observed.

The timing of contraceptive initiation reflects the method mix pattern. While about 40% of women had never practiced contraception, just 5% had initiated use prior to their first pregnancy. And, in keeping with the thrust on sterilization, another 40% had initiated contraception after having two surviving children (and 20% after three).

There is a clear divide in terms of public and private sector provision of contraceptive services. Sterilization services are largely provided in the public sector: 82% and 90%, respectively, of women who reported that they had undergone tubal ligation or that their husband had undergone vasectomy reported that the procedure had been conducted in the public sector. In contrast, the private or commercial sector played a much larger role in the provision of reversible contraceptive methods, such as condoms and oral pills (83% and 72%, respectively; IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Unmet Need for Family Planning

There is a substantial unmet need for contraception in India; as of 2015–2016, 13% of women were not practicing contraception despite wishing to space or limit childbearing, and this proportion had remained unchanged since 2005–2006 (IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007). Notably, the demand for spacing is limited, just 11% of women expressed a demand for spacing, while 55% expressed a demand for limiting childbearing, and while the majority of those with a demand for limiting had satisfied this demand (87%), far fewer—just 50%—of those with a demand for spacing their next pregnancy had done so.

Variation in unmet need levels was fairly narrow across such background characteristics as rural–urban residence, educational attainment levels, religion, caste, and wealth status. They were, in contrast, pronounced across age groups. Unmet need was most evident among young women: 22% of those aged 15–19 and 20–24 had an unmet need for contraception, compared with 19% of those aged 25–29 and 8–13% of those aged 30–39. As expected, unmet need among the young was overwhelmingly for spacing methods (16–20%). State-wise variation was also pronounced, with percentages of women with an unmet need for contraception ranging from 5–7% in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana in the south to 18–21% in Bihar and Jharkhand.


A pioneering national study of the incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy estimates that a total of 15.6 million abortions are performed annually, that is, an abortion rate of 47 per 1,000 women aged 15–49 (Singh et al., 2018), far in excess of previous estimates, drawn on data from small samples (6.4 million, 26 abortions per 1,000 women; Duggal & Ramachandran, 2004).

The abortion scenario in India has undergone a significant shift over the course of the 21st century with the availability of medication abortion. There has been a radical shift from surgical methods of abortion to medication abortion. Estimates from 2015 suggest that the overwhelming majority of abortions (81% or almost 13 million) are achieved using medication abortion, compared to 14% through surgical intervention, and 5% using other methods (Singh et al., 2018).

Abortion-related deaths contributed to 8% of maternal deaths according to the somewhat dated data available (Montgomery et al., 2014; Registrar General of India, 2006). Using more recent data drawn from annual health surveys conducted in EAG states (2010–2013), Yokoe et al. (2019) noted that risk factors for abortion-related deaths included abortion in adolescence, rural residence, and belonging to socially excluded scheduled tribes.

Abortion-related complication data are not widely available. Findings from the national study found that, as of 2015, the number of post-abortion complications due to induced abortion ranged from 51,000 in Assam to 1,100,000 in Uttar Pradesh, and the induced abortion complication treatment rate per 1,000 women aged 15–49 ranged from 4–7 in Assam, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu, to 21 in Uttar Pradesh and 26 in Madhya Pradesh. That abortion has become much safer is evident from findings that the majority of women who sought care may have mistaken signals of the normal process of medication abortion, such as incomplete abortion from medication abortion or bleeding. Severe complications, many overlapping, are also estimated among treated patients: 4–16% for infection; 2–9% for physical injuries; 3–7% for sepsis; and 1–4% for shock (Singh et al., 2018).

Infertility and Surrogacy

Evidence on the prevalence of infertility in India is sparse, and in its absence, childlessness, or the percentage of women aged 40–49 who have never had a live birth is used as a proxy. According to the NFHS-4, 3% of currently married women aged 40–49 were childless (IIPS & ICF, 2017). Higher rates were observed in surveys that contained a specific module on infertility: the prevalence of current infertility was 5% (percentage who were childless and had difficulty conceiving for the first time); Patra and Unisa (2017) found it to be higher among the socially disadvantaged than among other women; and care-seeking was compromised for many. Consequences of infertility in terms of stigma, violence, and marital abandonment are often observed (Sama, 2018).

Despite this, infertility care and management are not a public health priority, with poor infrastructure and capacity in public sector facilities well documented (Chauhan et al., 2018). At the same time, there has been an increasing trend toward the use of such options as ART and surrogacy (Malhotra et al., 2003; Nadimpally & Venkatachalam, 2016). Efforts to regulate eligibility criteria for both clients and surrogates and to ensure that the rights of surrogates are protected are underway; the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2019 was introduced in the lower house of the Indian Parliament, but is yet to be passed.

Sexually Transmitted Infections, Reproductive Tract Infections, and Other Gynecological Morbidities

Self-reported prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and symptoms such as abnormal genital discharge and genital sores or ulcers in the 12 months preceding the interview stood at 11% and 8% among sexually experienced women and men aged 15–49 years, respectively, in 2015–2016 (IIPS & ICF, 2017). A similar proportion of women (11%) but fewer men (5%) had so reported a decade earlier (IIPS & Macro International, 2007). Percentages reporting an STI, genital discharge, or a sore or ulcer ranged from a low 5% or less in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Sikkim, and Dadra & Nagar Haveli, to over 20% in states such as Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, and Mizoram (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Smaller studies, using clinical or lab-detected findings rather than self-reports, also report considerable reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and STIs. Vasireddy (2017) interviewed 520 randomly selected women in the slums of Guntur and found that the prevalence of infection using the syndromic approach was 33%, with the majority reporting vaginal discharge. Clinical confirmation noted that of those reporting a symptom, almost three in five (58%) were diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis, that adolescent girls were over-represented, as were the poor, the poorly educated, and the socially excluded (Vasireddy, 2017). Ghosh, Paul, Das, Bandyopadhyay, and Chakrabarti (2018) analyzed the cases of over 5,000 women attending an STI clinic in Odisha and noted that one-third were diagnosed with Trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis, respectively.

A strong and consistent association between RTIs and poor menstrual hygiene management practices is documented in a study of 558 women attending two hospitals in Odisha, among whom 62% were diagnosed with at least one infection, 41% with bacterial vaginosis, and 34% with candida infection. Torondel et al. (2018) showed that, even after adjustment for potentially confounding factors, women diagnosed with these two infections were more likely than others to report poor menstrual management practices such as use of reusable absorbent material, infrequent personal washing, and unhygienic drying and storage of materials.

Cervical cancer affects large numbers of Indian women. India is estimated to account for one-quarter of the worldwide burden of cervical cancers; an estimated 1 in 53 Indian women will experience cervical cancer during their lifetime. The high burden of cervical cancer has been attributed to such risk factors as poverty, early age at marriage, multiple sexual partners, multiple pregnancies, poor genital hygiene, malnutrition, and lack of awareness. Despite this high burden, there is no countrywide state-sponsored public health policy on prevention of cervical cancer screening or Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination (Bobdey, Jignasa, Jain, & Balasubramaniam, 2016).

Care-seeking for symptoms of infection and gynecological morbidity is limited. Moreover, public sector facilities are far less likely to be sought for treatment of STI symptoms than symptoms of other health problems. For example, Mitchell et al. (2011) found that while almost all women in rural areas of two districts of Andhra Pradesh sought antenatal services from the public sector (96%), few did so for STI symptoms (16%), and just 4% had sought STI-related services from a primary health center. Gawande, Srivastaba, and Kumar (2018)’s findings in rural areas near Mumbai city corroborate: the prevalence of RTIs among ever married women was found to be 21%; yet, just 14% had sought treatment from a qualified provider. Jayapalan (2016) found that, of 85 STI-infected men and women in Kerala, 60% of men and 82% of women had sought appropriate treatment for their first point of contact, many had received inappropriate treatment at this point of contact, and many (30% of men and 37% of women) cited poor quality of care in the facility from which they had first sough care, notably the unavailability of medicine and lack of confidentiality and privacy.

HIV Scenario

An estimated 2.14 million Indians were HIV+ in 2017, with overall rates declining to 0.22% from 0.31% in 2009 (NACO & ICMR-NIMS, 2018; NIMS & NACO, 2012). The NFHS found similar prevalence rates in 2015–2016, with an overall rate of 0.24%, 0.23% for women and 0.25% for men (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

India’s National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) estimates suggest that the number of new infections has declined to 87,600 in 2017 from approximately 120,000 in 2009. By 2017, almost 97% of the total population living with HIV were aged 15 or older, with females comprising 42% of this group, compared to 39% in 2009. HIV incidence per 1,000 uninfected population is estimated to have declined to 0.07 in 2017. Regional variation is considerable, and by 2017, incidence was considerably greater in northeastern states such as Mizoram, Nagaland, and Manipur (0.58–1.32) than previously high-incidence states such as Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu (0.05–0.09) and other states. The epidemic continues to be concentrated in high-risk populations, that is, sex workers, men who have sex with men, and injecting drug users (NACO & ICMR-NIMS, 2018).

Stigma and discrimination persist. The NFHS probed attitudes about an HIV+ person mixing with others in various situations (the school, the health facility, the workplace, and so on) and notes that positive attitudes on any one of seven situations were held by 60–80%, and on all attitudes by just 24% of women and 27% of men (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Reproductive health choices have expanded for women living with HIV/AIDS. There has been a considerable increase in the coverage of HIV testing, antiretroviral therapy (ART), and prevention of parent-to-child transmission (PPTCT) services in last few years, and counseling and testing services are now available across the nation through more than 15,000 integrated counseling and testing centers and ART services are available in more than 400 centers across the country, and more than 38,000 HIV-infected women reported PPTCT services (Department of AIDS Control, 2013, 2014). Rates of mother-to-child transmission have reduced, and more women are able to fulfill their fertility desires. Despite increased coverage of antiretroviral treatment, effective reproductive health care services do not always reach HIV-infected women, resulting, for example, in a high prevalence of unwanted pregnancies and induced abortions among them, and a low level of knowledge about prevention of mother to child transmission and safe pregnancy options (Darak, Hutter, Kulkarni, Kulkarni, & Janssen, 2016).

Gender-Based Violence

Notwithstanding laws that protect women from domestic violence, gender-based violence, notably marital violence, persist. Almost one-third of ever-married women (31%) had experienced physical or sexual violence perpetrated by their husband. Many of these women experienced injuries (25%), including 4% who suffered severe burns, 6% who had suffered deep wounds, and 8% who had experienced eye injuries, sprains, dislocations, and burns (IIPS & ICF, 2017). In addition, a significant and consistent association is observed between the experience of spousal violence and symptoms of RTIs/STIs (Jejeebhoy, Santhya, & Acharya, 2013), unintended pregnancy (Raushan, 2019), pregnancy-related care, and fetal and infant mortality (Jejeebhoy, Santhya, & Acharya, 2010).

Sexual and Reproductive Health of the Young

Almost one-third (30%) of India’s population (365 million in 2011) comprises young people aged 10–24 (Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, 2014). Whether India realizes the advantage of its demographic dividend, whether it achieves the Sustainable Development Goals, and whether it achieves its national aspirations for development all depend on investments made in the health, education, and skilling of this cohort. Despite considerable advance, the achievement of a successful transition to adulthood eludes many young Indians.

Entry into Sexual Life Before Marriage

Despite strictly imposed norms proscribing pre-marital sexual relations and even social mixing between boys and girls exist, there is growing evidence of pre-marital onset of sexual activity in adolescence, particularly among boys and young men. A sub-national survey of youth in 2006–2007 showed, for example, that among those aged 15–19, 9% of unmarried boys and 3–4% of unmarried and married girls aged 15–19 had engaged in pre-marital sex (IIPS & Population Council, 2010). Subsequent state-representative studies in three states have found somewhat higher percentages a decade later: 14–20% among unmarried boys, 6–9% among unmarried girls, and 6–16% among married girls (Table 5).

Findings also confirm that while sexual relations overwhelmingly take place within a romantic partnership, non-consensual, exchange sex, and casual sex are not unknown. Because of stigma and fear of disclosure of sexual activity status, lack of information, and inaccessible facilities or judgmental providers, contraceptive practice among the unmarried is limited and inconsistent. Moreover, risky behaviors are reported by considerable minorities, including non-use or inconsistent use of condoms, multiple partner relations, forced sex (experienced by girls and perpetrated by boys), and unintended pregnancy (Table 5).

Table 5. Pre-Marital Sexual Relations Among the Young, Selected States, 2015–2018

Bihar (2015–2016)1

Uttar Pradesh (2015–2016)2

Jharkhand (2018)3





Pre-marital sexual experience

Unmarried boys




Unmarried girls




Married girls




Consistent condom use*

Unmarried boys




Unmarried girls




Married girls




Forced sex*

Unmarried boys (perpetrated)




Unmarried girls (experienced)




Married girls (experienced)




Pre-marital pregnancy*

Unmarried boys




Unmarried girls




Married girls




Note: * among those who reported pre-marital sexual experiences.

1 Sources: Santhya et al. (2017a);

2 Santhya et al. (2017b);

3 Jejeebhoy et al. (2019).

Child Marriage and Lack of Free and Full Consent in Marriage-Related Decisions

Although India is committed to protecting adolescents from child marriage, and despite laws prohibiting marriage to young women before age 18 and to young men before age 21, many have married below these legally permissible ages. There has, however, been a precipitous decline in child marriage among girls over the 2005–2006 to 2015–2016 decade: among those aged 20–24, child marriage fell from 47% in 2005–2006 to 27% by 2015–2016. Child marriage (below age 18) was rare for boys (4%), however, as of 2015–2016, one-fifth of young men aged 25–29 had married below age 21 (IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007). State-wise variation in child marriage among women is considerable. In 2015–2016, child marriage prevalence ranged from 8–10% in Goa, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Punjab, and Jammu and Kashmir to 35–44% in Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, and West Bengal. Variation by socio-demographic characteristics was also observed, with urban and better educated young women, and those from economically well-off families far less likely to marry in childhood than other women (Kumar, 2019).

Evidence from India highlights that parents and extended family are typically involved in the screening of potential spouses for their children, and marriage is still perceived as a union between two families and not just between two individuals. Family-arranged marriage remains the norm. Self-arranged or love marriage in which young women and men select their spouse independently remain rare (Desai & Andrist, 2010; Jejeebhoy et al., 2019; Santhya et al., 2017a, 2017b) and the practice of denying girls’ a real say in marriage-related decisions persists. State-level findings suggest that many married girls meet their husband for the first time on the wedding day (Bihar (77%), Uttar Pradesh (57%), and Jharkhand (48%); Jejeebhoy et al., 2019; Santhya et al., 2017a, 2017b).

Child marriage is associated with a number of adverse marriage-related outcomes. Compared to those who had married in childhood, those who married after they were 18 were more likely to have been involved in planning their marriage, to reject wife beating, to have used contraceptives to delay their first pregnancy, and to have had their first birth in a health facility. They were less likely than women who had married early to have experienced physical or sexual violence in their marriage, or to have had a miscarriage or stillbirth (Santhya et al., 2010).

Early Childbearing

Childbearing in childhood and adolescence continues to be observed, although childbearing below age 15 is rare: 1% of women aged 20–24 had a first birth before age 15, 9% before they were 18, and 26% before they were 20. State-wise variation is wide; among young women aged 15–19, 8% had already begun childbearing nationally, ranging from 3% in some better developed states to as many as 19% in West Bengal (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Neonatal and perinatal mortality are far higher, moreover, among neonates born to adolescent mothers than mothers aged 20–29 (39 and 27 neonatal deaths per 1,000 live births to women aged 15–19 and 20–29, respectively; 45 and 33 perinatal deaths per 1,000 births, respectively; IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Contraceptive use among the young is limited: just 10% of 15–19-year-olds had used a modern method, compared to 24% of 20–24-year-olds and 48% among all married women aged 15–49. Modern methods most likely to be used were the condom and oral pills (used by 4% each); notably 1% had already been sterilized (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Individual-, Family-, and Community-Level Challenges

Several challenges operating at individual, family, and community levels continue to compromise India’s effort to realize SRH-related goals articulated within SDG 3. Issues such as lack of awareness of health-promoting behaviors, limited female agency, adherence to traditional notions of masculinity and femininity, inadequate male involvement, and limited spousal communication undermine SRH and rights of many.

Limited Awareness

Awareness of SRH-promoting behaviors, the need for SRH services, and women’s and men’s right to these services remain far from universal in India. Several parts of the country show low or moderate levels of awareness about best practices related to the care of women during pregnancy, delivery, the postpartum period, and of the newborns (Gupta, Shora, Verma, & Jan, 2015; Laishram, Thounaojam, Panmei, Mukhia, & Devi, 2013; Mangulikar, Howal, & Kagne, 2016; O’Neil, Naeve, & Ved, 2017; Patel et al., 2016; Santhya et al., 2017a, 2017b). For example, Santhya et al. (2017a, 2017b) showed that just 26–32% of unmarried girls, 28–32% of married girls, and 22–25% of unmarried boys, all aged 15–19 in two large states of India (Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), knew that a pregnant woman should have at least four antenatal check-ups. Awareness of danger signals is also limited (Chandhiok, Dhillon, Kambo, & Saxena, 2006; Goyal & Bhandari, 2008). Goyal and Bhandari (2008) studied delivery and postpartum morbidity in the Delhi slums and observed that, even among women experiencing excessive bleeding and high-grade fever, just 28% and 13%, respectively, recognized the condition as a severe morbidity. of 124 maternal deaths taking place across the country in 2012–2014, Subha Sri and Khanna (2014) reported that lack of awareness to seek timely care was one of the key causes.

In the area of contraception, while awareness of at least one contraceptive method is virtually universal (99%) among currently married men and women, awareness of non-terminal is not universal. For example, just 69% and 48%, respectively, of currently married women and men were aware of IUCDs, condoms, and oral pills (IIPS & ICF, 2017). Moreover, the awareness percentage of specific methods increased only marginally over time: for example, awareness about condoms increased from 76% in 2005–2006 to 82% by 2015–2016 among currently married women. At the same time, awareness of emergency contraceptive pills increased dramatically: from 12% to 42% among currently married women, and 23% to 48% among currently married men. Furthermore, awareness of contraceptive methods tends to be superficial; among adolescents and youth, although awareness of contraceptive methods was almost universal, specific knowledge of at least one method was limited (IIPS & Population Council, 2010; Jejeebhoy et al., 2019; Santhya et al., 2017a, 2017b).

Misconceptions about HIV transmission routes and means of protection against HIV are evident. A comparison of the levels of comprehensive awareness of HIV, that is, common misperceptions about transmission were rejected and the importance of consistent condom use and single-partner relations as means of avoiding infection were known, in 2005–2006 and 2015–2016 shows almost no change (17% to 21% among women and 33% to 32% among men; IIPS and ICF, 2017; IIPS and Macro International, 2007).

Limited awareness permeates the domain of rights and entitlements too. Women and the wider community lack awareness of women’s rights and the programs to which they are entitled. For example, they are poorly informed about the full range of services to which they are entitled under JSY (Santhya et al., 2011). Moreover, many women remain poorly informed about the legality of abortion and their rights under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act (Banerjee et al., 2013; Jejeebhoy et al., 2011a, 2011b). For example, a community-based study found that while three quarters of rural women were aware that abortion is legal in at least one situation, about half believed that it is illegal in the case of unmarried women or contraceptive failure, and almost all women believed that women seeking abortion must obtain their husband’s consent (Jejeebhoy, Zavier & Kalyanwala, 2010). The perception that abortion is illegal in India has been partly fuelled by conflicting messages about the illegality of abortion following prenatal sex detection and the legality of abortions for other reasons (Nidadavolu & Bracken, 2006).

Limited Female Agency, Compromised Exercise of Reproductive Rights, and Wide Gender Power Imbalances

Within the age and gender-stratified family systems prevailing in India, women’s agency is hugely constrained. There is considerable evidence of the extent to which limited agency — in terms of decision-making, freedom of movement, control over economic resources, and experience of violence—has compromised health promoting behaviors and timely care-seeking (Bloom, Wypij, & Gupta 2001; Jejeebhoy & Santhya, 2014; Leon, Lundgren, Sinai, Sinha, & Jennings, 2014). Although women’s participation in decisions relating to their own health care has increased over time (62% in 2005–2006 to 75% in 2015–2016), women’s freedom to visit a health facility unescorted has remained unchanged (48% to 50%; IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007). Likewise, while the proportion of women who have a savings account that they themselves use has tripled since 2005–2006 (15% to 53%), the proportion of women who have money that they can decide how to use had remained unchanged (45% to 42%).

Women’s limited agency is manifested in compromised exercise of reproductive rights too. A sub-national study of youth in India observed that 51% of young women expressed a desire to have postponed first pregnancy, but of those with demand, only 10% had practiced contraception (Jejeebhoy, Santhya, & Zavier, 2014). Also reflecting young women’s compromised exercise of reproductive rights were their reported reasons for not using a contraceptive despite a desire to postpone the first birth, as revealed in the recent stat-representative studies in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Jharkhand: the leading reason, expressed by 18% of girls in Jharkhand, 20% of girls in Bihar, and 33% of girls in Uttar Pradesh was their husband’s objection to doing so, and 11–16% to other family members’ objections to doing so (Jejeebhoy et al., 2019; Santhya et al., 2017a, 2017b). Similarly, about a fifth of women aged 15–49 who had a live birth in the five years preceding the survey who did not go for an institutional delivery cited objections from husband and other family members for doing so nationally (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Gender power imbalances are evident in the persistence of marital violence. Women’s inability to refuse marital sex, even if they suspect their husband has engaged in extra-marital relations, and gendered attitudes that condone pre- and extra-marital sex for men but not women also have the potential to compromise women’s health. Several studies have noted that, as a result, many women, including the newly married, are at risk of acquiring infections from their husbands (Santhya & Jejeebhoy, 2007).

Limited Male Involvement and Traditional Notions of Masculinity

Men’s attitudes and behaviors influence not only their own SRH outcomes but also those of their wife or partner. Just 6% of couples practicing contraception were using a male method, even as recently as 2015–2016. Condom use among men reporting high-risk behaviors has also been found to be limited: 41% of men who had engaged in high-risk sexual behaviors in the year preceding the interview used a condom at last high-risk sex and 48% of men who had engaged in paid sex in the year preceding the interview used a condom during their last paid sexual intercourse (IIPS & ICF, 2017). Furthermore, the percentage of men who perceive that contraception is women’s business rather than a man’s concern has increased from 22% to 37% and that women who use contraception may become promiscuous from 16% to 20% over the period 2005–2006 to 2015–2016.

Male involvement in their wife’s pregnancy-related care has increased only marginally over time: of the men whose youngest living child was less than three years old at the time of the survey, and whose wife had received antenatal care, 79% had accompanied their wife for an antenatal check-up in 2015–2016 (increased from 74% in 2005–2006). Moreover, the leading reason provided by men whose wife did not receive antenatal care was the husband’s own objections, although the percentage so citing had declined over the decade (to 26% from 40%; IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007).

Limited Spousal Communication

Spousal communication about sexual and reproductive matters is limited. Mishra and Ramanathan (2002) found that 45% of the husbands whose pregnant wives attended an antenatal clinic in Delhi reported that they had discussed family planning with their wives. Char, Saavala, and Kulmala (2009) observed that one-third of men in Madhya Pradesh who responded to a survey questionnaire and most of those participating in focus group discussions reported themselves to be the sole decision-makers about reproductive health. Limited communication is also evident among the young: the Youth Study found, for example, that just one-third (34%) of married men aged under 30 and half (54%) of married young women aged 15–24 had ever discussed contraception with their spouse (IIPS & Population Council, 2010). Where communication occurs, moreover, it is selective: a study of young men and women in Guntur district (Andhra Pradesh), and Dhar and Guna districts (Madhya Pradesh) found that topics discussed frequently included antenatal care-seeking but rarely included contraception (Santhya, Jejeebhoy, & Ghosh, 2008).

Spousal communication on reproductive illnesses, especially STIs, is also limited. Santhya and Dasvarma, (2002) showed that, in rural Tamil Nadu, only 37% and 20%, respectively, of married women and men with symptoms of possible RTIs had informed their spouse about their illness experience. Marfatia et al. (2000) also found that only 18% of married and unmarried men attending clinics in Gujarat had informed their wife or partner about their illness, while Mishra and Ramanathan (2002) highlighted that the same occurred for less than one-third of husbands of women attending antenatal clinics in Delhi, and Sahasrabuddhe et al. (2002) mentioned two-fifths of married males at a clinic in Maharashtra.

Program Challenges

Although many programmatic innovations have been implemented to improve reproductive health care delivery, gaps remain. Inadequate infrastructure and human resources, inadequate attention to provider capacity and training, poor quality of services, gaps in the delivery of a range of reproductive health services, and limited efforts to reach the most vulnerable and most in need have seriously compromised the pace of improvement in SRH outcomes.

Infrastructure and Human Resources

Limitations with regard to infrastructure and human resources play a key role in compromising access to and the quality of health services in general, including reproductive health services.

As far as infrastructure is concerned, as of March 2018, there were a total of 158,417 sub-centers, 257,43 primary health centers (PHCs), and 5,624 community health centers (CHCs) in rural areas, and an estimated shortfall of 32,900 sub-centers, 6,430 PHCs, and 2,1185 CHCs in the country (MOHFW, 2018a). Of those currently functional, just 7%, 12%, and 13%, respectively, of sub-centers, PHCs, and CHCs are functioning as per the Indian Public Health Standards.

Lack of human resources poses as severe a constraint to health service delivery as does the poor infrastructure. As of 2017, there were 7.8 doctors and 21 nursing and midwifery personnel per 10,000 population in India (WHO, 2018). As of March 2018, there was a shortage of 6% of auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) at sub-centers and PHCs, 14% of doctors at PHCs, and 82% of specialists at CHCs (MOHFW, 2018a). Moreover, not all sanctioned posts have been filled—13% of posts of ANMs at sub-centers and PHCs, 25% of posts of doctors at PHCs, and 74% of posts of specialists at CHCs sanctioned were vacant.

These shortages in human resources are attributed to a number of factors, including difficulties in recruiting and retaining doctors and nurses in rural areas, especially in the high focus states, delays in sanctioning posts, and limited investment in building a cadre of midwives (MOHFW, 2011a; Prakasamma, 2009). While the inclusion of contractual staff has significantly improved the availability of staff at health center level, contractual employment is fraught with problems, including delayed renewal of contracts, poor service conditions, high turnover, and disparities between contractual and permanent staff including in terms of salary (MOHFW, 2011a).

Provider Capacity and Training

Significant measures have been taken, under the NRHM, to strengthen provider capacity. However, the reach of provider training has been variable, and provider awareness remains of concern. For example, awareness of health promoting behaviors was limited among many accredited social health activists (ASHAs) (MOHFW, 2011b; Santhya, Jejeebhoy, & Zavier, 2011); an eight-state evaluation found that just 26% of ASHAs recognized foul-smelling vaginal discharge as a danger signal during the postpartum period and 34% knew that a newborn should not be bathed immediately (MOHFW, 2011c). Medical officers at PHCs in selected districts of Maharashtra and Rajasthan were ill-informed about abortion-related issues: just half were aware that the consent of the husband or guardian is not required in order for an adult woman to undergo abortion (Jejeebhoy et al., 2011a, 2011b).

Training does not always translate into enhanced knowledge or the practice of new skills. A study of some 96 ANMs in two districts in Rajasthan reports that 36% had conducted deliveries in the last three months; of those who had conducted deliveries, just 6% had always used the partograph while conducting the deliveries, and just 22% gave oxytocin injections always or sometimes during the third stage of labor (Santhya & Jejeebhoy, 2012).

Inequitable Reach of Services and Failure to Reach the Most Vulnerable

Findings from national level surveys have noted that despite some narrowing, there remain huge geographic and socio-demographic inequities in reproductive health indicators (e.g., infant mortality, child marriage, and early childbearing) and access to services (e.g., institutional delivery, contraception), by geography and socio-demographic characteristics. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the change over time (2005–2006 and 2015–2016) in selected indicators between the most and the least disadvantaged across several socio-demographic characteristics. Findings underscore the country’s failure to reach the most marginalized, although improvement over time is seen.

As Figure 2 shows, neonatal mortality rates were considerably higher among adolescents (54/1,000, and 39/1,000, respectively, in 2005–2006 and 2015–2016) than among those aged 20–39 (34/1,000 and 27/1,000, respectively). Differences by education and household economic status were pronounced, but by religion and caste were relatively narrow by 2015–2016 (IIPS & ICF, 2017). Findings suggest that while levels of perinatal and neonatal mortality rates have declined among the least and the most disadvantaged, disparities have not narrowed or have narrowed marginally over the decade with respect to most indicators except educational attainment.

Figure 2. Neonatal mortality by socio-demographic characteristics, 2005–2006 and 2015–2016 (IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007).

Note. ● = Most advantaged group; → = Most disadvantaged group.

The Constitution of India recognises and makes provision for special reservations for individuals belonging to socially disadvantaged castes and tribes in India, and classifies them as belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST).

Figure 3 shows corresponding patterns with regard to modern contraceptive use. There has been little change in either levels or patterns of modern contraceptive use. Disparities between the more and the less advantaged remain, for the most part, as wide in 2015–2016 as they were in 2005–2006. However, the rural–urban disparity narrowed from 11 to 5 percentage points, and the disparity across household wealth quintiles narrowed from 23 to 17 percentage points.

Figure 3. Modern contraceptive method use at the time of interview by socio-demographic characteristics, 2005–2006 and 2015–2016 (IIPS & ICF, 2017; IIPS & Macro International, 2007).

Note. ● = Most disadvantaged group; → = Most advantaged group.

The Constitution of India recognises and makes provision for special reservations for individuals belonging to socially disadvantaged castes and tribes in India, and classifies them as belonging to scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST).

The reach of frontline workers also remains limited and inequitable: contact with a health worker (ANM, AWW, ASHA, MPW, and other) in the three months prior to the NFHS-4 interview was reported by just 24% of women. Unmarried women were about one-third as likely as currently married women (11% and 28%, respectively) to report a contact with a health worker (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Poor Quality of Services

The poor quality of SRH services in the public sector has been widely observed, and such issues as lack of cleanliness, long waiting times, shortages of drugs, lack of visual and auditory privacy, demands for unauthorized payments, and absence of respectful treatment documented. For example, the most commonly reported reason for not using government health facilities is the poor quality of care (reported by 48% of households that do not generally use government facilities). Likewise, information provided tended to be skewed: the leading topic discussed was immunization, and even among pregnant women, such topics as delivery preparedness, complication readiness, and postpartum care were discussed with seven percent or less (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2010a, 2011a), the Planning Commission (2011), Santhya et al. (2011), and the United Nations Population Fund (2009) have also pointed to lacunae affecting the quality of services: a lack of supplies, skewed prioritization of responsibilities, delays in payments, and inadequate mentoring or supervision, for example.

The quality of services is also hampered by the uneven use of best practices. For example, the active management of the third stage of labor was practiced infrequently; instead, unmonitored intrapartum oxytocin has been observed even in hospital deliveries (Iyengar, Iyengar, Suhalka, & Dashora, 2009a; Iyengar, Suhalka, & Agarwal, 2009b; Sharan, Strobino, & Ahmed, 2005). Relatively few women in Rajasthan (29%) reported that all essential examinations had been performed at the time of hospital delivery (Santhya et al., 2011).

Concerns about the quality of care characterize HIV/AIDS/STI/RTI services as well. Health care providers are not always adept at communicating messages linking HIV and reproductive health: for example, about the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, unintended pregnancy and vertical transmission of HIV, promotion of a healthy sexual life, and relationships free from stigma and discrimination. They are also not necessarily well informed about HIV and sexual and reproductive health and rights, or have the skills to provide good quality care (Bharat & Mahendra, 2007).

Continued Unmet Need for Family Planning

A number of factors may be responsible for the program’s inability to satisfy the demand for family planning. Although the program is said to provide a cafeteria of contraceptive methods, choices offered are, in practice, limited. In fact, only seven methods are offered in the program: tubal ligation, vasectomy, oral contraceptives, IUCDs, condoms, injectable contraceptives, and emergency contraceptive pills (MOHFW, 2018b). Methods that have aroused controversy, such as implants, are not available to women from the public health system.

Finally, although efforts to involve women in the selection of contraceptive methods or provide them information that could help them arrive at a decision for themselves have improved, client choice continues to be constrained. For example, in 2015–2006, of women using modern contraceptives at the time of the interview and who had initiated use in the previous five years, 54% (an increase of 26 percentage points during the 2005–2006 to 2015–2016 decade) were informed about more than one method of contraception (IIPS & ICF, 2017). Also, far from universal was the experience of contraceptive counseling with regard to how the method works, what likely side effects are, and how side effects can be managed. Of women who were practicing contraception and had adopted a method in the previous five years, just 47% (an increase of 15 percentage points from 2005–2006) were informed about side effects or problems relating to the method they had adopted, and just 39% (an increase of 13 percentage points) were told what to do if they experienced side effects (IIPS & ICF, 2017).

Limitations in Meeting Women’s Need for Abortion Services

The NRHM Operational Guidelines stipulate that MVA and MA should be provided at PHC level for women up to eight and seven weeks of gestation, respectively, and these, along with second trimester abortion and management of post-abortion complications should be available at all facilities from the CHC level (those identified as first referral units) upward (MOHFW, 2010b). These guidelines have not been realized, and abortion services are typically unavailable and inadequate in the public health system at levels below the District Hospital in most states. A recent sub-national study found that, among abortions provided in facilities, the public sector accounts for only one-quarter of facility-based abortion provision, largely because many public facilities do not offer abortion services. At the same time, also reflecting poor-quality services, relatively few abortions overall—fewer than one in four—are provided in health facilities, and almost three-quarters of all abortions are achieved using medication abortion drugs obtained directly from chemists and other unregistered persons, many without a prescription, rather than from health facilities (Moore et al., 2019; Singh et al., 2018). Among surgical abortions taking place in public sector facilities, moreover, between one-quarter and two-fifths continue to be performed using dilation and curettage or dilation and evacuation, indicating that these facilities are using methods that are outdated, and more likely to place women at risk of complications than other available methods (Singh et al., 2018). Notably, most PHCs and even some CHCs lacked trained staff, necessary certification, and/or the required equipment and supplies for providing safe abortions (Kalyanwala, Zavier, & Jejeebhoy, 2010). Finally, although medical abortion should be free in all public facilities, in several states, just 12–42% offered free medical abortion services, and 28–53% offered free first trimester surgical abortion (Moore et al., 2019).

Violations of women’s right are also evident. Inadequate provision of information to women about the law, including where and till which gestational age abortion is provided, poor quality of care, lack of confidentiality, and the frequent insistence by providers on concurrent family planning deter women from seeking abortion in public sector facilities (Stillman et al., 2014). Providers in almost all the facilities in the district-level study in Maharashtra and Rajasthan required the husband’s written consent, and many refused abortion to minors and the unmarried. Quality of care reported by women who had undergone abortion was indifferent, with relatively few women counseled about post-abortion contraception (Jejeebhoy et al., 2011a; 2011b; Jejeebhoy, Zavier, & Kalyanwala, 2010). Finally, the government of India’s strict measures to enforce the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostics Techniques (PCPNDT) Act of 2003, which prohibits the misuse of prenatal diagnostic tests for the purpose of sex determination often denies women the right to access legal abortion. Many women themselves misperceive that abortion for any reason as illegal. And a number of qualified providers are reluctant to offer abortion services because they fear reprisals from authorities imposing restrictions on sex-selective abortions.

Limited Emphasis on Engaging Men in Reproductive Health

Health system biases persist against involving men in reproductive health. There has been, effectively, a bifurcation of services for men and women, with HIV/AIDS-related activities focused on men, and sexual and reproductive health services focused on women. The ASHA program and other periphery-level services overwhelmingly cater to women. Although efforts to engage men in the antenatal care of their wife have improved, substantial proportions of men are still not reached out. Of men whose youngest living child was aged under three years, only 37–51% reported that they had ever been informed by a health care worker about such specific signs of pregnancy complication as vaginal bleeding, convulsions, prolonged labor, severe abdominal pain, and high blood pressure (increased from 21–25% in 2005–2006), and 47% (increased from 37%) had been told what to do in case of complications (IIPS & ICF, 2017). Family planning services are also more focused on women than men, and couple counseling is rarely reported. Finally, efforts to include men in programs intended to change traditional notions of masculinity and build greater respect for women have been limited.

Gaps in the Implementation of Policies and Laws

India has a host of strong laws, policies, and programs that are intended to promote SRH and protect the rights of women, men, and young people to access appropriate services. Unfortunately, implementation of these laws and policies has been lax on several fronts. For example, child marriage persists and prosecution of violators is rare, despite a forward-thinking law prohibiting the practice. Abortions remain inaccessible despite a law that guarantees women’s right to access it. Unmet need for contraception is considerable, despite program commitments to ensure contraceptive choice is fulfilled. Efforts to raise awareness about rights under these laws, policies, and programs are limited, and people’s awareness of their sexual and reproductive rights is therefore compromised (see, for example, Jejeebhoy et al., 2011a, 2011b; Santhya, 2019).

Moving Forward

India has demonstrated its commitment to improving the sexual and reproductive health of its population in many policies, laws, and programs. Significant strides have been made in many dimensions of sexual and reproductive health and rights. Yet there is a long way to go.

Moving forward requires multi-pronged efforts. Improvement is needed in the quality of infrastructure and equipment at public sector facilities, to an emphasis on capacity building of frontline and other providers, to ensuring that services are delivered in respectful ways that acknowledge client rights. Women, men, and adolescents must be made aware—through outreach work as well as, for the young, through schools and community groups—about health promoting practices as well as their right to access quality services. Above all, programs must target the most disadvantaged—the poor, the rural, the poorly educated, the young—in order that the vast inequities that persist are narrowed.


  • Banerjee, S. K., Andersen, K. L., Warvadekar, J., & Pearson, E. (2013). Effectiveness of a behavior change communication intervention to improve knowledge and perceptions about abortion in Bihar and Jharkhand, India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(3), 142–151.
  • Bharat, S., & Mahendra, V. S. (2007). Meeting the sexual and reproductive health needs of people living with HIV: Challenges for health care providers. Reproductive Health Matters, 15(29), 93–112.
  • Bloom, S. S., Wypij, D., & Gupta, M. S. (2001). Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography, 38(1), 67–78.
  • Bobdey, S., Jignasa, S., Jain, A., & Balasubramaniam, G. (2016). Burden of cervical cancer and role of screening in India. Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 37(4), 278–285.
  • Chandhiok, N., Dhillon, B. S., Kambo, I., & Saxena, N. C. (2006). Determinants of antenatal care utilization in rural areas of India: A cross-sectional study from 28 districts (An ICMR task force study). The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 56(1), 47–52.
  • Char, A., Saavala, M., & Kulmala, T. (2009). Male perceptions on female sterilization: A community-based study in rural central India. International Perspectives on Sexual Health, 35(3), 131–138.
  • Chauhan S., Unisa, S., Joshi, B., Kulkarni, R., Singh, A., Subramanian, T., . . ., Agarwal, D. (2018). Capacity assessment of district health system in India on services for prevention and management of infertility. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 43, 19–23.
  • Darak, S., Hutter, I., Kulkarni, V., Kulkarni, S., & Janssen, F. (2016). High prevalence of unwanted pregnancies and inducted abortions among HIV-infected women from western India: Need to emphasise dual method use? AIDS Care, 28(1), 43–51.
  • Department of AIDS Control. (2013). Multi-drug ARV for prevention of parent to child transmission of HIV (PPTCT) under National AIDS Control Program in India: National Strategic Plan. New Delhi, India: Department of AIDS Control, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare.
  • Department of AIDS Control. (2014). Annual report: 2013–2014. New Delhi, India: Department of AIDS Control, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare.
  • Desai, S., & Andrist, L. (2010). Gender scripts and age at marriage in India. Demography, 47(3), 667–687.
  • Duggal, R., & Ramachandran, V. (2004). The abortion assessment project—India: Key findings and recommendations. Reproductive Health Matters, 12, 122–129.
  • Firoz, T., Chou, D., Dadelszen, P., Agrawal, P., & Vanderkruik, R., Tunçalp, O., Magee, L. A., van Den Broeke, N., & Sayb, L. (2013). Measuring maternal health: Focus on maternal morbidity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 794–796.
  • Gawande, K. B., Srivastaba, A. S., & Kumar, P. (2018). Reproductive tract infection and health seeking behaviour: A cross sectional community based study. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 5(4), 1524–1528.
  • Ghosh, I., Paul, B., Das, N., Bandyopadhyay, D., & Chakrabarti, M. K. (2018). Etiology of vaginal/cervical discharge syndrome: Analysis of data from a referral laboratory in Eastern India. Indian journal of dermatology, 63(6), 484–489.
  • Goyal, S. M., & Bhandari, N. (2008). Delivery and postnatal morbidity among women in urban slums in New Delhi. In M. A. Koenig, S. Jejeebhoy, J. Cleland, & B. Ganatra (Eds.), Reproductive health in India new evidence. Jaipur, India: Rawat.
  • Gupta, R. K., Shora, T.N., Verma, A.K., & Jan, R. (2015). Knowledge regarding antenatal care services, its utilization, and delivery practices in mothers (aged 15–49 years) in a rural area of North India. Tropical Journal of Medical Research, 18(2), 89–94
  • IIPS (International Institute for Population Sciences). (1995). National family health survey (MCH and family planning), India, 1992–93. Mumbai, India: IIPS.
  • IIPS (International Institute for Population Sciences) & ICF. (2017). National family health survey (NFHS-4), India, 2015–16. Mumbai, India: IIPS.
  • IIPS (International Institute for Population Sciences) & Macro International. (2007). National family health survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005–06. Mumbai, India: IIPS.
  • IIPS (International Institute for Population Sciences) & ORC Macro. (2000). National family health survey (NFHS-2), India, 1998–99. Mumbai, India: IIPS.
  • IIPS (International Institute for Population Sciences) & Population Council. (2010). Youth in India: Situation and needs 2006–2007. Mumbai, India: IIPS.
  • Iyengar, K., Iyengar, S. D., Suhalka, V., & Dashora, K. (2009a). Pregnancy-related deaths in rural Rajasthan, India: Exploring causes, context, and care-seeking through verbal autopsy. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, 27(2), 293–302.
  • Iyengar, K. (2012). Early postpartum maternal morbidity among rural women of Rajasthan, India: A community-based study. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 30, 213–225.
  • Iyengar S. D., Iyengar, K., Suhalka, V., & Agarwal, K. (2009b). Comparison of domiciliary and institutional delivery-care practices in Rural Rajasthan, India. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 27(2), 303–312.
  • Jayapalan, S. (2016). Healthcare-seeking preferences of patients with sexually transmitted infection attending a tertiary care center in South Kerala. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(2), 157–161.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Raushan, M., et al. (2019). Situation of adolescents in Jharkhand: Findings from a state-wide survey. Mumbai, India: Dasra.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Santhya, K. G. (2014). Sexual and reproductive health: Current status and future needs. In S. J. Jejeebhoy, P. M. Kulkarni, K. G. Santhya et al. (Eds.), Population and Reproductive Health in India: An Assessment of the Current Situation and Future Needs (pp. 175–246). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Santhya, K. G., & Acharya, R. (2010). Health and social consequences of marital violence: A synthesis of evidence from India. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Santhya, K. G., & Acharya, R. (2013). Physical and sexual violence and symptoms of gynaecological morbidity among married young women in India. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 8(10), 1151–1167.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Santhya, K. G., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2014). Demand for contraception to delay first pregnancy among young married women in India. Studies in Family Planning, 45(2), 183–201.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Zavier, A. J. F., Acharya, R., & Kalyanwala, S. (2011a). Increasing access to safe abortion in rural Maharashtra: Outcomes of a comprehensive abortion care model. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Zavier, A. J. F., Acharya, R., & Kalyanwala, S. (2011b). Increasing access to safe abortion in rural Rajasthan: Outcomes of a comprehensive abortion care model. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Zavier, A. J. F., & Kalyanwala, S. (2010). Assessing abortion-related experiences and needs in four districts of Maharashtra and Rajasthan, 2006. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Kalyanwala, S., Zavier, A. J. F., & Jejeebhoy, S. (2010). Public health facilities and women’s access to abortion: A situation analysis in Maharashtra and Rajasthan. New Delhi, India: Population Council (unpublished report).
  • Kulkarni, P. M. (2014). The population and development scenario in India. In S. J. Jejeebhoy, P. M. Kulkarni, K. G. Santhya et al. (Eds.), Population and reproductive health in India: An Assessment of the current situation and future needs (pp. 175–246). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
  • Kumar, S. (2019). Experiences from research on child marriage and evaluation of the interventions in India. Paper presented at the Design Workshop for the Second Phase of the Global Program on Ending Child Marriage (GPECM), February 17–23, 2019, Jaipur, India.
  • Laishram, J., Thounaojam, U. D., Panmei, J., Mukhia, S., & Devi, H. S. (2013). Knowledge and practice of ante-natal care in an urban area. Indian Medical Gazette, 101–106.
  • Leon, F. R., Lundgren, R., Sinai, I., Sinha, R., & Jennings, V. (2014). Increasing literate and illiterate women’s met need for contraception via empowerment: A quasi-experiment in rural India. Reproductive Health, 11(74).
  • Malhotra, A., Nyblade, L., Parasuraman, S., MacQuarrie, K., Kashyap, N., & Walia, S. (2003). Realizing reproductive choice and rights: Abortion and contraception in India, report. Washington, DC: International Council for Research on Women.
  • Mangulikar, S. K., Howal, P. V., Kagne, K. P. (2016). A cross-sectional study of antenatal care services utilization, delivery practices and factors affecting them in urban slum area of India in 2015. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 4(5), 1501–1505.
  • Marfatia, Y. S., Barge, S., Parmar, S., & et al. (2000). Treatment seeking behaviours of STD cases attending skin and VD department and private clinics in Vadodara (unpublished).
  • Montgomery, A. L., Ram, U., Kumar, R., Jha, P., & Million Death Study Collaborators. (2014). Maternal mortality in India: causes and healthcare service use based on a nationally representative survey. PloS One, 9(1), 1–11, e83331.
  • Moore, A. M., Stillman, M., Shekhar, C., Kalyanwala, S., Acharya, R., Singh, S., . . ., Alagarajan, M. (2019). Provision of medical methods of abortion in facilities in India in 2015: A six state comparison. Global Public Health.
  • Ministry of Youth Affaires and Sports. (2014). National Youth Policy 2014. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Youth Affaires and Sports.
  • Mishra, U. S., & Ramanathan, M. (2002). Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India. Health Policy and Planning, 17(1), 90–98.
  • Mitchell, A., Mahal, A., & Bossert, T. (2011). Healthcare utilisation in rural Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(5), 15–19.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2010a). National rural health mission, state wise progress as on 30.09.2010. New Delhi, India: Department of Family Welfare, MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2010b). Operational guidelines on maternal and newborn health. New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2011a). Fourth common review mission report 2010. New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2011b). Update on the ASHA program. New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2011c). ASHA: Which way forward? Evaluation of ASHA program. New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2014). Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram strategy handbook. New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2017a). National health policy 2017. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2017b). The assisted reproductive technology (regulation) bill, 2017.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2018a). Rural health statistics, 2017–18. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2018b). Annual report, 2017–18. New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (2019). The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (n.d.a). Ayushman Bharat Health and wellness Center. New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • MOHFW (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare). (n.d.b). National Health Mission (NHM). New Delhi, India: MOHFW, Government of India.
  • NACO & ICMR-NIMS (National AIDS Control Organization & ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics). (2018). HIV estimations 2017: Technical report. New Delhi, India: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  • Nadimpally, S., & Venkatachalam, D. (2016). Marketing reproduction: Assisted reproductive technologies and commercial surrogacy in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 23(1), 87–104.
  • Nidadavolu, V., & Bracken, H. (2006). Abortion and sex determination: Conflicting messages in information materials in a district of Rajasthan, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 14(27), 160–171.
  • NIMS & NACO (National Institute of Medical Statistics & National AIDS Control Organisation). (2012). Technical report: India HIV estimates 2010: NACO. New Delhi, India: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  • Niti Aayog. (2018). SDG India Index: Baseline Repot, 2018. New Delhi, India: Niti Aayog.
  • Office of the Registrar General, India. (2006). Maternal mortality in India: 1997–2003 trends, causes and risk factors. New Delhi, India: Office of Registrar General.
  • Office of the Registrar General, India. (2011). Maternal & child mortality and total fertility rates. New Delhi, India: Office of Registrar General, India.
  • Office of the Registrar General, India. (2013). Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India 2010–12. New Delhi, India: Office of Registrar General, India.
  • Office of the Registrar General, India. (2018). Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India 2014–16. New Delhi, India: Office of Registrar General, India.
  • Office of the Registrar General, India. (n.d.). Table 1: Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), Maternal Mortality Rate and Life Time Risk; India, EAG & Assam, South and Other states, 2011–13. New Delhi, India: Office of Registrar General, India.
  • Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. (2013). Primary census abstract, data highlights, India, Series 1. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India.
  • Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. (2014). Profile of adolescents and youth in India size, growth rate and distribution of adolescent and youth population. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India.
  • O’Neil, S., Naeve, K., & Ved, R. (2017). An Examination of the maternal health quality of care landscape in India. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
  • Patra, S., & Sayeed U. (2017). Female infertility in India: Causes, treatment and impairment of fertility in selected districts with high prevalence. Global Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 6(4), 1–11.
  • Patel, B. B., Gurmeet, P., Sinalkar, D. R., Pandya, K. H., Mahen, A., & Singh, N. (2016). A study on knowledge and practices of antenatal care among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Pune, Maharashtra. Medical Journal of D.Y. Patil University, 9, 354–362.
  • Paul, V. K., Sachdev, H. S., Mavalankar, D. V., Ramachandran, P., & Kirkwood, B. R. (2011). Reproductive health, and child health and nutrition in India: Meeting the challenge. The Lancet, 377, 332–349.
  • Planning Commission. (2011). Report of the working group on national rural health mission (NRHM) for the 12th five year plan. New Delhi, India: Planning Commission.
  • Prakasamma, M. (2009). Maternal mortality-reduction program in Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 27(2), 220–234.
  • Raushan, R. (2019). Effect of domestic violence on unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant women: Regional perspective in India. Unpublished.
  • Sahasrabuddhe, V. V., Gholap, T. A., Jethava, Y. S. Joglekar, N. S., Brahme, R. G., Gaikwad, B. A, . . ., Mehendale, S. M. (2002). Patient-led partner referral in a district hospital based STD clinic. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 48(2), 105–108.
  • Sama. (2018). Interrogating interruptions. Research report on exploring mental health issues of young people. Unpublished report.
  • Santhya, K. G. (2019). Perceptions of young adolescent girls on marriage (Research Brief). New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Santhya, K. G., Acharya, R., Pandey, N., Gupta, A. K., Rampal, S., Singh, S. S. & Zavier, A. J. F. (2017b). Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) in Uttar Pradesh, India (2015–2016). New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Santhya, K. G., Acharya, R., Pandey, N., Singh, S. S., Rampal, S., Zavier, A. J. F., & Gupta, A. K. (2017a). Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) in Bihar, India (2015–2016). New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Santhya, K. G., & Dasvarma, G. L. (2002). Spousal communication on reproductive illness among rural women in southern India. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 4(2), 223–26.
  • Santhya, K. G., & Jejeebhoy, S. J. (2007). Early marriage and HIV/AIDS risk factors among young women. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(14), 1291–1297.
  • Santhya, K. G., & Jejeebhoy, S. J. (2012). Providing maternal and newborn health services: Experiences of auxiliary nurse midwives in Rajasthan. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Santhya, K. G., Jejeebhoy, S. J., Acharya, R., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2011). Effects of the Janani Suraksha Yojana on maternal and newborn care practices: Women’s experience in Rajasthan. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Santhya, K. G., Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Ghosh, S. (2008). Early marriage and sexual and reproductive health risks: Experiences of young women and men in Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, India. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Santhya, K. G., Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2011). Implementing the Janani Suraksha Yojana: Perspectives and experiences of accredited social health activists in Rajasthan. New Delhi, India: Population Council.
  • Santhya, K. G., Ram, U., Acharya, R., Jejeebhoy, S. J., Ram, F., & Singh, A. (2010). Associations between early marriage and young women’s marital and reproductive health outcomes: Evidence from India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36(3), 132–139.
  • Sharan, M., Strobino, D., & Ahmed, S. (2005). Intrapartum oxytocin use for labor acceleration in rural India. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 90, 251–257.
  • Singh, S., Hussain, R., Shekhar, C., Acharya, R., Moore, A. M., Stillman, M., . . ., Ball, H. (2018). Abortion and unintended pregnancy in six Indian states: Findings and implications for policies and programs. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute.
  • Stillman, M., Frost, J. J., Singh, S., Moore, A. M., & Kalyanwala, S. (2014). Abortion in India: A literature review. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute.
  • Subha Sri, B., & Khanna, R. (2014). Dead women talking: A civil society report on maternal deaths in India. Chennai, India: CommonHealth and Jan Swasthya Abhiyan.
  • Torondel, B., Sinha, S., Mohanty, J. R., Swain, T., Sahoo, P., Panda, B., . . ., Das, P. (2018). Association between unhygienic menstrual management practices and prevalence of lower reproductive tract infections: A hospital-based cross-sectional study in Odisha, India. BMC Infectious Diseases, 18(1), 473.
  • United Nations Population Fund. (2009). Concurrent assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in selected states: Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi, India: UNFPA.
  • Vasireddy, S. (2017). A study on the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among women of reproductive age, in urban slums of Guntur city. MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), 31–35.
  • WHO (World Health Organization). (2018). The 2018 update, global health workforce statistics. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  • Yokoe, R., Rowe, R., Choudhury, S. S., Rani, A., Zahir, F., & Nair, M. (2019). Unsafe abortion and abortion-related death among 1.8 million women in India. BMJ Global Health, 4, e001491.