Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM the OXFORD RESEARCH ENCYCLOPEDIA, GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH (oxfordre.com/publichealth). (c) Oxford University Press USA, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Personal use only; commercial use is strictly prohibited. Please see applicable Privacy Policy and Legal Notice (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 07 December 2019

Breastfeeding and Public Health Impacts

Summary and Keywords

Breastfeeding is one of the best public health “buys” available for countries at all levels of development. In the first year of life, appropriate infant nutrition (exclusive breastfeeding to around 6 months) reduces infant mortality and hospital admissions by 50% or more. Early life nutrition has important influences, including on childhood illnesses, obesity, cognitive development, hospitalizations, and later chronic disease. Breastfeeding is consistent with the historical cultural practices of all societies, and its benefits of breastfeeding last a lifetime. While the development of infant formula has been of benefit to some infants, its inappropriate promotion has resulted in a decline of breastfeeding, and, as a result, health gains in many countries have not been as great as they could have been. The health benefits of breastfeeding will provide some protection against the effects of climate change, which will cause a decline in potable water supplies and increases in the incidence of some infections. Infant formula production has very high environmental costs, while breastfeeding as well as being the best infant feeding intervention also has very low environmental impact. An important part of the sustainable development agenda must be to promote breastfeeding and its benefits and to reverse the inappropriate promotion and use of infant formula.

Keywords: breastfeeding, public health benefits, infant health, maternal morbidity, health costs

Introduction

Breastfeeding is fundamental to human nutrition and the foundation of successful public health policy. Promoting breastfeeding is at the core of the UNICEF/World Health Organization (WHO) emphasis on nutrition and health in the first 1,000 days of life (UNICEF, 2017). The WHO recommends breastmilk as the sole source of nutrients for infants until around 6 months, and it continues to be important until two years and beyond (WHO, 2002). The World Health Assembly has endorsed targets for infant nutrition and specifically a target to increase exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates while acknowledging the link between undernutrition in childhood and the onset of overweight/obesity and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) later in life. “Appropriate breastfeeding practices, including appropriate complementary feeding practices after 6 months of EBF, not only prevent malnutrition among young children, but are also associated with less susceptibility to overweight and NCDs later in life” (UNICEF & WHO, 2018; United Nations Subcommittee on Nutrition [UNSCN], 2015). The U.S. Surgeon General strongly advocates for the benefits of breastfeeding and the improvement of rates in the United States (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011). The USA Healthy People 2020 targets include increasing the proportion of infants ever breastfed, breastfeeding at 6 months (target 62%), and increasing the proportion of breastfeeding through three months (target 46%) (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2010, 2019). The promotion of breastfeeding (EBF for 6 months and then continuing) is probably the most beneficial and cost-effective public health interventions available (N. C. Rollins et al., 2016; Victora et al., 2016). Increasing breastfeeding is an important element of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs; C. Binns, Lee, Low, & Zerfas, 2017; UNSCN, 2015).

The new European draft policy for health contains several references to the importance of breastfeeding in maintaining public health (World Health Organization European Regional Office, 2019):

The life of a mother and her baby are inextricably linked. Breastfeeding is an important aspect of caring for infants and young children. It leads to improved nutrition and physical growth, reduced susceptibility to common childhood illnesses and better resistance to cope with them, a reduced risk of certain noncommunicable diseases in later life and stimulating bonding with the caregiver and psychosocial development.

Definitions of Breastfeeding

The following are the definitions of breastfeeding as published by the WHO (2008). Often nonstandard definitions are used in studies and reports or the data is collected in a way that is inconsistent with these definitions.

Definitions used:

  • Early initiation of breastfeeding—Percentage of infants who are put to the breast within one hour of birth.

  • Exclusive breastfeeding <6 months—Percentage of children aged 0–5 months who are fed exclusively with breast milk in the 24 hours prior to the survey.

  • Introduction of solid, semisolid, or soft foods (6–8 months)—Percentage of children aged 6–8 months who received solid, semisolid, or soft foods in the 24 hours prior to the survey.

  • Breastfeeding at age 2—Percentage of children aged 20–23 months who received breast milk in the 24 hours prior to the survey.

There are several important issues relating to how EBF is reported: definition, reporting method (point prevalence or period prevalence), and health implications for the infant. EBF is rarely measured according to the strict WHO definition, which makes it difficult to interpret some research results (C. W. Binns, Lee, Sauer, & Hewitt, 2012; Flores, Mielke, Wendt, Nunes, & Bertoldi, 2018; Inoue, Binns, Otsuka, Jimba, & Matsubara, 2012). It is sometimes reported as a period prevalence of EBF 0–6 months, based on cross-sectional studies (rather than a longitudinal cohort). The reported value then depends on the age composition of the sample. For example, an EBF rate 0–5 months could represent 100% of infants breastfeeding for 2 months or 33% breastfeeding for 6 months, with very different public health outcomes. For this reason, measurement of point prevalence (percentage breastfeeding at an exact point of time, e.g., at 6 months) is the preferred measurement. In some cases, EBF may not be measured since birth. A commonly used procedure is to ask how the infant has been fed in the past 24 hours and if only breastmilk has been given, the prevalence is reported as the EBF rate at that point in time. This method ignores the impact of earlier non-breast milk feeds as EBF should be defined as no other feeds since birth (see Table 1). Even in the relatively homogenous regions of Europe or in Australia, a variety of breastfeeding measurements are in use (C. W. Binns, Fraser, Lee, & Scott, 2009; Sarki, Parlesak, & Robertson, 2019). Many studies support the importance of promoting EBF until 6 months of life, but when assessing studies it is important to consider which definition is in use (C. W. Binns & Lee, 2014).

Table 1 Definitions of Breastfeeding

Category of infant feeding

Requires that the infant receive

Allows the infant to receive

Does not allow the infant to receive

Exclusive breastfeeding

Breastmilk (including milk expressed or from wet nurse or breastmilk donor)

Prescribed drops or syrups (vitamins, minerals, medicines)

Anything else

Predominant (Full) breastfeeding

Breastmilk (including milk expressed or from wet nurse or breastmilk donor) as the predominant source of nourishment

Liquids (water, water-based drinks, fruit juice, oral rehydration solutions), ritual fluids and drops or syrups (vitamins, minerals, medicines)

Anything else (in particular: nonhuman milk, solid foods, food-based fluids)

Complementary breastfeeding

Breastmilk and solid or semisolid foods

Any food or liquid including nonhuman milk

Any breastfeeding

Some breastmilk

Any food or liquid including nonhuman milk

Ever breastfed

Received breastmilk or colostrum on at least one occasion

An example of how different definitions in use and different methods of measurement result in considerable variation in reported results is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Reported Rates (as Percentage at the Exact Time) of EBF in the Asia Pacific Region

Country

WHO Database EBF 6/12 (% 0–6 months)

UNICEF Database EBF 6/12 (% 0–6 months)

WHO/UNICEF W/Shop 2007 EBF 6/12 (% 0–6 months)

Curtin Studies Asia EBF at 6/12 (% at 6 months)

Australia

46

22

2

Cambodia

60

12

62

20

China

56

31

65

6

Indonesia

40

45

Japan

41

38

15

Korea (ROK)

14

0

Laos PDR

17

23

5

Malaysia

29

29

30

AA

Mongolia

79

51

57

Myanmar

15

NZ

13

2

Papua New Guinea

21–86

59

30

35

Philippines

34

34

33

Singapore

2

1

Thailand

4

15

Vietnam

12

15

12

1

Note. WHO = World Health Organization; EBF = exclusive breastfeeding; NZ = New Zealand. This table illustrates differences in EBF rates according to how the definition is interpreted. Details are available in the source of the table (C.W. Binns et al., 2012).

The definition used is important because whether or not an infant is exclusively breastfed influences the development of a healthy microbiome. Dysbiosis of the microbiome appears to be associated with obesity and chronic disease later in life (Chong, Bloomfield, & O’Sullivan, 2018; Wells, 2018).

Breastmilk Composition

Breastmilk is a living tissue that includes maternal cells, probiotics, and a wide range of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, minerals, micronutrients, and other chemicals. There are thousands of chemical entities with hundreds of bioactive compounds (Allen & Dror, 2018; Dror & Allen, 2018). The preparation of a consolidated table of breastmilk composition is not possible as it varies by the age of the infant, number of infants, and maternal nutritional status and diet. Further research is required to provide more details of the composition of breastmilk in different environments. This requires careful attention to methodology as the human-milk matrix differs markedly from blood, plasma, or urine matrixes and contains living bacteria and cells, including stem cells (Hampel, Dror, & Allen, 2018; Hassiotou & Hartmann, 2014; Wells, 2018). While in the future it may be possible to relate breastmilk composition to individual function, this is not generally possible and awaits more analysis (Hellmuth et al., 2018; Wells, 2018). Exceptions to this may be nutrients such as iodine and iron, but otherwise relating breastfeeding to infant and later life outcomes generally relies on epidemiological studies.

Methodology in Breastfeeding Research

Research into breastfeeding is challenging because of ethical issues and the difficulty of adjusting for all potential confounding factors. Unlike the randomized controlled trials (RCT) in clinical medicine, infant feeding research does not have a placebo or null option available. Mothers obviously cannot choose not to feed an infant (C. Binns, Lee, & Kagawa, 2017; Hurlimann, Pena-Rosas, Saxena, Zamora, & Godard, 2017; Lessen & Kavanagh, 2015). The most difficult aspect is the inability to randomize interventions as the known advantages of breastmilk make it impossible to conduct an ethical RCT (Binns, Lee, & Kagawa, 2017). The difficulties of understanding the effects of small differences in exposures in nutrition research are even more pronounced in infant feeding, as breastmilk is a living biological fluid that varies with infant age, maternal nutrition, and health (Barnard, Willett, & Ding, 2017; Ioannidis, 2018; Lessen & Kavanagh, 2015).

The most widely cited RCT in breastfeeding is the PROBIT cluster RCT that commenced in Belarus in 1996 with the recruitment of 17,046 mother–infant dyads (Kramer et al., 2001). The hospitals were randomized to receive training, modeled on the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI), which was designed to increase the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding. Only mothers who had initiated breastfeeding were included, and there was no control group of formula-fed infants (R. Patel et al., 2014). Only healthy newborns of at least 37 weeks’ gestation and at least 2500 grams birth weight with an Apgar score of at least 5 at 5 minutes were included. The enrollment of mothers was limited to those who were followed up at specific polyclinics associated with each hospital (Martens, 2012). Despite limitations, the study has been very useful and has shown, for example, the value of BFHI in prolonging breastfeeding duration and that cognitive development is related to breastfeeding quantity and quality. However, it lacks some information, such as prelacteal feeds and early supplementation, that could influence microbiome formation and later conditions such as obesity (Martens, 2012). Thus the PROBIT trial is a trial of a BFHI intervention that was successful in extending breastfeeding duration. It also showed that EBF reduced the rate of gastrointestinal infections. PROBIT does not allow for a comparison between breastfeeding and a formula (or placebo) group that would be required to study associations between obesity and infant feeding (Martens, 2012).

Because of the ethical limitations on RCTs, the science of breastfeeding must be based on laboratory studies and a variety of observational designs with the limitations of undisclosed confounders.

Global Breastfeeding Rates

Breastfeeding rates are below the levels required for optimal infant and lifetime health. “Any breastfeeding” rates are generally accurate, provided they are reported as a point prevalence or as “ever breastfed.” In Europe, there are significant differences in breastfeeding rates, data collection methods, and breastfeeding strategies. At the age of 6 months, 35% to 65% of infants in surveyed countries were breastfed, 13% to 39% exclusively or fully (Theurich, Weikert, Abraham, & Koletzko, 2018). UNICEF publishes data on EBF rates with a period prevalence 0–5 months (UNICEF, 2018). Globally, only 42% of mothers initiate breastfeeding within the first hour of birth, and about 40% of infants under 6 months of age are exclusively breastfed (period prevalence). Fewer than 75% children ages 12 to 15 months are still breastfeeding (UNICEF, 2018) (See Table 3). The WHO gives a similar rate of 40% exclusively breastfed 0–5 months (WHO, 2018a). Victora et al. (2016) provided a more detailed analysis of available data, with most mothers starting breastfeeding, and only three countries (France, Spain, and the United States) having rates below 80% for “ever breastfeeding.” Early initiation rates (breastfeeding within one hour of birth) were low at about 40% (Victora et al., 2016). In low-income and middle-income countries, 37% of infants younger than 6 months are exclusively breastfed, defined as the proportion of infants aged 0–5 months who are exclusively breastfed (Victora et al., 2016). The World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative and World Breastfeeding Scorecard provide resources on breastfeeding data collection, also based on period prevalence (UNICEF WHO, 2018; World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative, 2018).

Table 3 UNICEF Summary Statistics of Breastfeeding

Region

Early initiation <1 hour (%)

Exclusive breastfeeding <6/12 (%)

Solid or soft foods being given at 6–8 months (%)

Breastfeeding at age 2 years (%)

Sub-Saharan Africa

49

40

69

52

Eastern and Southern Africa

59

54

73

60

West and Central Africa

40

29

68

46

Middle East and North Africa

45

35

61

33

South Asia

39

46

57

75

East Asia and Pacific

44

31

69

24

Latin America and Caribbean

49

32

88

28

CEE/CIS (excluding Russian Fed)

54

27

29

Least developed countries

55

47

66

63

World

44

39

66

49

Note. CEE/CIS = central and eastern Europe/Commonwealth of Independent States.

Source. UNICEF (2016).

Median breastfeeding duration varies considerably between countries, between rural and urban locations, and by other demographic, cultural, and socioeconomic subpopulations. Within the European Union EBF rates within the first 48 hours ranged from 88.4% in Latvia to 16.8% in Cyprus, with “any breastfeeding rates” of 96.9% in Slovenia and 54% in Ireland (European Commission, 2010). In a review of breastfeeding rates, Callen and Pinelli (2004) found the ranges of reported any breastfeeding rates at 6 months in Australia to be 50% to 52%, Canada 31% to 41%, Europe 19% to 52%, and the United States 19% to 33%. In low- and middle-income countries, rates of EBF are usually very low because of the high rates of prelacteal feeds while “any breastfeeding” rates are high. For example, in the Maldives 100% of mothers were breastfeeding on hospital discharge and 83% at 6 months, but the EBF 0–3 month was 8% (Abdulraheem & Binns, 2007). It is important that breastfeeding rates are regularly and accurately monitored for continuing health program evaluation.

The Benefits of Breastfeeding

The public health benefits of breastfeeding at a population level have been well documented. The WHO Collaborative Study highlighted the excess of infant and child deaths in lower income countries when infants are not breastfed (WHO Collaborative Group, 2000). Protection provided by breastfeeding declined steadily with age during infancy, but for infants less than 2 months of age the odds ratios of dying if not breastfed was 5.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4–9.8). It has been estimated by Victora and colleagues (2016) that scaling up of breastfeeding to a near universal level could prevent 823,000 annual deaths in children younger than 5 years and 20,000 annual deaths in women from breast cancer. This is probably an underestimate if associations with a slightly lower level of evidence were included. Victora et al. summarize the benefits: “our meta-analyses indicate protection against child infections and malocclusion, increases in intelligence, and probable reductions in overweight and diabetes.” For mothers, benefits include reduced breast and ovarian cancer and increased birth spacing. Other reviews of the benefits of breastfeeding compared to formula feeds have indicated a wider range of associations including those shown in Table 4. This is a summary of breastfeeding benefits, and the original reviews should be consulted for details.

Table 4 Summary of the Benefits of Breastfeeding

Infant health outcomes (reduced incidence of the following)

Surgeon General

Victora

Lessen

NHMRC

Ip

Nonspecific gastrointestinal infections

++

++

++

+

++

Upper/lower respiratory tract infections

++

++

++

Otitis media

++

++

++

++

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

+

+

SIDS

++

++

+

++

Necrotizing enterocolitis (LBW)

++

++

Asthma

+

+

+

Eczema

+

+

Later overweight or obesity

+

+

+

++

+

Comorbidities of excess weight (type 2 diabetes, CV disease, heart disease, hypertension, high cholesterol)

+

+

+

+

Cognitive development (slightly higher IQ)

++

+

Maternal benefits (lower rates of the following conditions)

Breast cancer prevention

+

++

+

+

Ovarian cancer prevention

+

+

+

+

Hypertension

+

+

Diabetes

+

+

+

Less retention of weight postpartum

+

Postpartum Depression

++

Note. ++ = strong evidence; + = moderate evidence. NHMRC = National Health and Medical Research Council.; CV = cardiovascular; LBW = low birth weight.

Sources. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018a); Ip et al. (2007); Ip, Chung, Raman, Trikalinos, & Lau (2009); Lessen & Kavanagh (2015); NHMRC (2012, 2013); Petherick (2010); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011); Victora et al. (2016); World Health Organization (2018a).

Reviews that provide further evidence linking breastfeeding and reduced risk of specific conditions include those on obesity (Matvienko-Sikar et al., 2018; McCallister, Medrano, & Wojcicki, 2018; Mihrshahi & Baur, 2018; Palou, Pico, & Palou, 2018; Tambalis, Mourtakos, Panagiotakos, & Sidossis, 2018), respiratory tract infection (McAllister et al., 2019), cardiovascular disease, hypertension, metabolic syndrome (Bonifacino, Schwartz, Jun, Wessel, & Corbelli, 2018; Faintuch & Faintuch, 2018; Heshmati et al., 2018; Wisnieski, Kerver, Holzman, Todem, & Margerison-Zilko, 2018), SIDS (Moon & Hauck, 2018; Young & Shipstone, 2018), asthma (Miliku & Azad, 2018; Moossavi, Miliku, Sepehri, Khafipour, & Azad, 2018), and necrotizing enterocolitis (A. L. Patel & Kim, 2018). The hypertension benefit is proportional to duration of breastfeeding (Qu, Wang, Tang, Wu, & Sun, 2018). Further analysis has confirmed an association between breastfeeding and adult intelligence and has ruled out genetic confounding (Horta, Hartwig, & Victora, 2018; Mortensen, 2015). Other conditions that have been reported to be associated with breastfeeding include leukemia, osteoporosis, coeliac disease, infant colic, and Alzheimer’s disease, but the evidence is variable in strength. Breastfeeding within one hour decreases neonatal deaths, and breastfeeding for ≤12 months was associated with decreased nutrition risk and healthier eating behaviors and dietary intake at 3 to 5 years of age (Borkhoff et al., 2018; Phukan, Ranjan, & Dwivedi, 2018).

Mothers also gain health benefits from breastfeeding (see Table 4). A large prospective cohort study in Japan (n = 140,420) found that mothers who breastfed had a lower risk of mortality during the 20-year follow-up (Otsuki et al., 2018). Postnatal depression and anxiety are reduced in mothers who breastfeed (Yusuff, Tang, Binns, & Lee, 2016). In Japan where excellent maternal care has substantially reduced maternal mortality, suicide due to postnatal depression is the most common cause of prenatal maternal death (Takeda et al., 2017). The promotion of breastfeeding provides one solution to this problem. The risks of breast cancer (Collaboration for Breast Cancer, 2002; Sauter, 2018) and ovarian cancer are reduced in mothers who breastfeed (Ali, 2018; C. W. Binns, Lee, & Lee, 2014; Su, Pasalich, Lee, & Binns, 2013; Unar-Munguia, Torres-Mejia, Colchero, & Gonzalez de Cosio, 2017; Zhang, Xie, Lee, & Binns, 2004). Breastfeeding for longer than 6 months is associated with smaller maternal waist circumference up to one decade after delivery (Snyder et al., 2019). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is an increasing problem in many societies and in a large cohort study, breastfeeding for longer than 6 months was associated with lower risk (Ajmera et al., 2019). A systematic review of breastfeeding and hypertension found a reduced risk that persisted for decades (Bonifacino et al., 2018). In the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study (n = 80,191) a dose–response relationship was found between breastfeeding and a lower risk of stroke among postmenopausal women and, after adjustment, a 23% lower risk of stroke (Jacobson et al., 2018). One of the most important chronic diseases in terms of global disease burden is type II diabetes mellitus, and a meta-analysis found that this is reduced in mothers who have breastfed, although it is possible that this may be related to the weight loss following breastfeeding (Feng, Xu, Hu, & Pan, 2018). Breastfeeding has an important public health benefit in increasing birth spacing. During lactational amenorrhoea, the rate of pregnancy before 6 months of age is reduced to 2% to 3% (Duong, 2012; Van der Wijden, Kleijnen, & Van den Berk, 2003).

The Human Microbiome

The composition and activity of the gastrointestinal microbiome has gained in importance in public health in the past decade and has been linked to health and diseases as diverse as asthma, allergy, diabetes, depression, obesity, and arthritis (Gaufin, Tobin, & Aldrovandi, 2018; Gilbert et al., 2018). During birth infants are exposed to microbes in the birth canal, breastmilk, and the environment to initiate establishment of the gut microbiome. Within the first year of life, an estimated 1014 microbes, comprising 500 to 1,000 species, colonize the gastrointestinal tract (Gilbert et al., 2018). Breastmilk contains bacteria and prebiotics (oligopolysaccharides) to promote the growth of healthy bacteria. The establishment of a normal, healthy microbiome is disrupted by preterm birth, caesarean delivery, not breastfeeding, and the use of perinatal antibiotics (Chong et al., 2018; Iozzo & Sanguinetti, 2018; Stiemsma & Michels, 2018). The use of infant formula early in life leads to changes in the microbiome that are consistent with later obesity (Forbes et al., 2018). The development and preservation of a healthy microbiome has important social, ethical, and public health implications (O’Doherty, Virani, & Wilcox, 2016).

Public Health Costs of Not Breastfeeding

Not breastfeeding imposes health and economic costs on the infant, the family, and society. Any breastfeeding is beneficial, but overall benefit is proportional to the duration and whether the breastfeeding is exclusive. The infant incurs costs from increased susceptibility to infectious disease and increased incidence of longer term chronic disease. The infant and society incur social capital costs through lower levels of cognitive development and increased healthcare costs. Mothers incur costs due to increased rates of breast and ovarian cancers and other chronic illnesses. Society loses due to the environmental costs of infant formula production, increased health costs, and lower productivity. Global infant formula industry sales were $US44.8 billion in 2014, but at the same time the cost to society resulting from less breastfeeding was estimated at $US302 billion, representing 0.49% of the world’s gross national product (GNP; N. C. Rollins et al., 2016; Victora et al., 2016). In the United States, costs of excess deaths from infant formula was estimated at $14.2 billion with the majority attributable to maternal expenses (M. C. Bartick et al., 2017). There have been many other studies of the costs of not breastfeeding, but the huge value of the contribution, and the future potential contribution of mothers’ milk production to global GNP, has yet to be acknowledged (Baker et al., 2016; M. Bartick, 2011, 2013; M. Bartick & Reinhold, 2010; M. C. Bartick et al., 2017; Colaizy et al., 2016; J. P. Smith, 2013; J. P. Smith, Thompson, & Ellwood, 2002; Stuebe et al., 2017). The excess of infant deaths due to the availability and inappropriate marketing of infant formula in the 1980s in less developed countries has been estimated to be as high as 9.4% (Anttila-Hughes, Fernald, Gertler, Krause, & Wydick, 2018). Despite the known public health risks of infant formula, the increase in the use of formula continues and is most marked in the middle-income countries of East Asia, particularly in China and Indonesia (Baker et al., 2016; Boue et al., 2018).

Public Health Factors and Breastfeeding Rates

In traditional cultures almost all mothers, perhaps 99%, were able to breastfeed satisfactorily (C. W. Binns, 1976). In the rare cases that this was not possible or following the illness or death of the mother, another woman from the village would become a wet nurse. Unfortunately, without extended families and village support and the entrenched traditional culture of breastfeeding, breastfeeding rates in high-income societies are low and of short duration. The specific reasons have been widely studied as a basis for inclusion in health promotion programs and do vary between cultures (C. Binns et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2018; National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013; Scott & Binns, 1999; Scott, Binns, Oddy, & Graham, 2006).

Important influences include the following (Cohen et al., 2018):

  • Smoking (father, mother, or environmental exposure).

  • Mode of delivery.

  • Parity. Previous successful breastfeeding is more likely to lead to further successful episodes of breastfeeding (Huang, Ouyang, & Redding, 2019).

  • Infant separation—includes “rooming in” and postnatal “rest,” which is common in Asia (usually longer after caesarean section) and early return to work.

Maternal and family education about breastfeeding should begin before pregnancy or in the early stages of pregnancy. The earlier the decision is made to breastfeed, the more likely breastfeeding is to be successful. The role of fathers is increasingly recognized as being important in extending breastfeeding duration (Kuliukas et al., 2019; Mahesh et al., 2018; Maycock et al., 2013). The National Health and Medical Research Council (2012; NHMRC) Infant Feeding Evidence review found strong evidence for antenatal and perinatal support for breastfeeding to increase the proportion of women breastfeeding (both exclusive and nonexclusive) up to age 6 months. With almost universal access to smartphones at an individual or village level, the use of breastfeeding apps has become an important breastfeeding promotion tool (McKay et al., 2018; White, Burns, Giglia, & Scott, 2016; White, Giglia, Scott, & Burns, 2018).

The level of maternal education influences breastfeeding outcomes. In higher income Western societies, women with higher levels of education are more likely to breastfeed (Holowko, Jones, Koupil, Tooth, & Mishra, 2016; Mangrio, Persson, & Bramhagen, 2018). In Asia the opposite is the case, with more educated mothers breastfeeding less, perhaps related to historical practices of the ruling class who often used wet nurses for their infants (Zhao, Zhao, Du, Binns, & Lee, 2017b).

In the United States, lower income mothers are less likely to breastfeed, while in other countries such as China, the reverse is the case (Liu et al., 2013; Mercier, Burcher, Horowitz, & Wolf, 2018; Tang, Binns, Luo, Zhong, & Lee, 2013). Intimate partner violence and other disruptive family events decrease breastfeeding (Mezzavilla, Ferreira, Curioni, Lindsay, & Hasselmann, 2018). Maternal illness, including gestational diabetes and perinatal depression, reduce breastfeeding rates. However, mothers who do manage to breastfeed improve the outcomes of both conditions (M. C. Bartick et al., 2013; Chamberlain et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2014; Yusuff et al., 2016).

Potential Public Health Interventions

Breastfeeding benefits society through reduced health costs, increased productivity, and environmental protection. It is the responsibility of society to create a supportive environment for such a public health benefit and to promote its use at every opportunity. A review of public health and breastfeeding has identified the following areas for intervention (Brown, 2017):

  • health services;

  • population-level health promotion;

  • supporting maternal legal rights;

  • protection of maternal well-being; and

  • reducing the reach of the breastmilk substitute industry.

Health services in the context of breastfeeding include hospitals and all other levels of service, which should all follow the steps advocated in the BFHI that have been endorsed by most public health authorities, including WHO and UNICEF (Aryeetey & Dykes, 2018). Implementation of the BFHI has been shown to improve breastfeeding duration (Kramer et al., 2001; Patterson, Keuler, & Olson, 2019; Perez-Escamilla, Martinez, & Segura-Perez, 2016; Zarshenas, Zhao, Binns, & Scott, 2018).

Multidimensional antenatal programs have also been shown to be effective in promoting breastfeeding. A cluster RCT in Burkino Faso has shown that multidimensional antenatal programs with community support increased the EBF rate 0–6 months to 93%, evidence of a remarkably successful large-scale intervention (control 53%) (Cresswell et al., 2019; N. Rollins & Doherty, 2019).

In traditional societies the expectation is that all mothers will breastfeed. In modern society it is important to educate mothers and family members on the benefits of breastfeeding. Discussion of infant feeding should begin as early in the pregnancy as possible, as the earlier the decision is made, the more likely breastfeeding will be established (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013). Population-level promotion would include school and community education programs on the importance of breastfeeding for health and development (Patnode, Henninger, Senger, Perdue, & Whitlock, 2016).

Maternal legal rights include the provision of paid maternity leave, the availability of facilities for mothers to breastfeed or express milk, and the freedom to breastfeed wherever and whenever they wish. Maternity leave increases breastfeeding (Espghan Committee on Nutrition et al., 2009; Kim, Shin, & Donovan, 2019; Navarro-Rosenblatt & Garmendia, 2018; Ratnayake & Rowel, 2018; Scott et al., 2006). When a mother has to return to work, it is still possible to continue to breastfeed on a part-time basis with great benefit to mother and infant (Lakati, Binns, & Stevenson, 2002a, 2002b).

Care, support, and advice for parents, but particularly mothers, after delivery, are important. Perinatal depression is common in all societies, and in severe cases medical treatment may be required (Avalos, Flanagan, & Li, 2019; Molenaar, Kamperman, Boyce, & Bergink, 2018; Xu et al., 2014; Yusuff, Tang, Binns, & Lee, 2015). Breastfeeding is associated with lower rates of postnatal depressive symptoms (Yusuff et al., 2016). The U.S. Preventive Taskforce has published guidelines on the prevention of perinatal depression, finding counseling interventions can be effective in preventing perinatal depression (O’Connor, Senger, Henninger, Coppola, & Gaynes, 2019; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, 2019). Other common difficulties include mastitis, the management of low birthweight infants, and perceived breastmilk inadequacy (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013). Maternal obesity may pose additional difficulties in breastfeeding (Dutton, Borengasser, Gaudet, Barbour, & Keely, 2018; Flores et al., 2018; Lyons, Currie, Peters, Lavender, & Smith, 2018). In traditional villages, mothers would had the support of an extended family, but in modern societies a formal care structure may be needed. An RCT has shown that smartphone apps can be used to extend breastfeeding and may be more practical on a population level (White et al., 2016; White, Martin, et al., 2016). Mothers also need to be provided with access to contraception. While lactational amenorrhoea provides some protection for 6 months (up to 98%), the use of a low-dose progesterone pill has been shown to have no significant effect on breastmilk (Berens & Labbok, 2014; Duong, 2012; Van der Wijden & Manion, 2015). After the introduction of complementary foods or the cessation of amenorrhoea, additional contraception should be used. For mothers who are breastfeeding and become pregnant, breastfeeding may continue during pregnancy and after delivery.

The mother’s weight should be monitored (as it usually is) as the extra energy required for breastfeeding may reduce weight gain. Mothers who have type I diabetes and are pregnant and breastfeeding require additional monitoring of glucose levels. Mothers who are HIV positive and pregnant and also breastfeeding who are on ART require special monitoring of blood levels. Mothers can continue breastfeeding their first baby and their new baby as well if so desired (Lopez-Fernandez, Barrios, Goberna-Tricas, & Gomez-Benito, 2017).

The marketing of infant formula has an impact on breastfeeding rates. There is no doubt that modern infant formula is a quantum leap above traditional breastmilk substitutes, but it cannot match the benefits of the living tissue that is breastmilk. The widespread promotion and incorrect claims related to formula have contributed to lower rates of breastfeeding. The World Health Assembly (WHA) passed a resolution

calling on all countries to implement the WHO’s Guidance on Ending the Inappropriate Promotion of Foods for Infants and Young Children to further protect breastfeeding, prevent obesity and chronic disease, and promote a healthy diet. In addition, the guidance aims to ensure that caregivers receive clear and accurate information on feeding.

(WHO, 2016b)

One hundred ninety-nine countries signed the WHO Code on the Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes and 84 countries have enacted legislation implementing all or many of the provisions of the Code and subsequent relevant WHA resolutions. Infant formula manufacturers are not permitted to distribute samples in hospitals or to parents in any way or provide incentives to health providers. Manufacturers frequently skirt advertising restrictions by using the same product names for infant formula and for products directed at older children (Berry, Jones, & Iverson, 2012). Implementing and enforcing the WHO Code is an important step to control inappropriate and misleading advertising. The WHO is calling for greater enforcement of the Code as only one-third of countries have legal restraints on advertising foods for infants under 6 months of age (WHO, 2018b). The United States and the Republic of Korea remain the only countries not to sign the Code. The Code is in need of modification to cover all infant formula to 12 months and “follow-on” formulae marketed to toddlers, as the advertising of these products promotes brand recognition for all infant formula, regardless of their target age group (J. Smith, Galtry, & Salmon, 2014).

Caesarean Section and Breastfeeding

The increasing rates of caesarean section (C-section) pose a public health risk in their own right through risks common to any surgical intervention, increased use of antibiotics, increased costs, and lower rates of breastfeeding (Chen et al., 2018; Qiu, Binns, Zhao, Lee, & Xie, 2008; Sandall et al., 2018; Zhao, Zhao, Du, Binns, & Lee, 2017a). Anesthesia and the type of pain relief for C-section may reduce the amount of breastfeeding (Lim et al., 2018). Boerma et al. (2018) estimated based on data from 169 countries (98.4% of the world’s births), that 29.7 million (21.1%, 95% uncertainty interval 19.9–22.4) births occurred through C-section in 2015, double that in 2000 (Boerma et al., 2018). Armenia is an example of a middle-income country that has seen an upward trend in C-sections increasing from 7.2% in 2000 to 31.0% in 2017 (Tadevosyan et al., 2019). Rates as high as 80% for C-section are not uncommon in the larger cities of Asia and South America (Giordano, Nascimento, Godoy-Miranda, & Surita, 2019; Haider et al., 2018). C-section rates in Vietnam have increased rapidly and were reported as 57.6% for public and 70.6% for private patients (Giang, Ulrich, Tran, & Pozza, 2018). C-section is associated with lower rates and shorter duration of breastfeeding (Chen et al., 2018; Prior et al., 2012; Zanardo et al., 2010). The disadvantage of C-section is reduced if infant to mother contact can be made within one hour of delivery and breastfeeding initiated (Prior et al., 2012).

C-section is often followed by a period of complete bed rest for several days during which infants may receive infant formula. Best practice in C-section allows the mother to remain conscious with epidural/spinal anesthesia and to breastfeed her infant within minutes of delivery, just as happens following a vaginal delivery. C-section carries an economic cost due to the resources required, and the lower rates of breastfeeding impose an additional burden. Infants delivered in this way have altered microbiome due to lack of contact with the birth canal and the almost universal use of antibiotics for prophylaxis against infection.

Smoking

The tobacco epidemic is one of the biggest public health threats the world has ever faced, killing more than 7 million people a year. More than 6 million of those deaths are the result of direct tobacco use while around 890,000 are the result of nonsmokers being exposed to second-hand smoke. Around 80% of the 1.1 billion smokers worldwide live in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of tobacco-related illness and death is greatest (WHO, 2018d). Many women quit smoking during pregnancy, but up to 90% resume smoking within 12 months, a time when ideally mothers should still be breastfeeding (Pollak et al., 2015). Nicotine levels in the breastmilk of women who smoke are three times higher than nonsmokers; 24-hour breastmilk volume is reduced, and the duration is shorter (Lok, Wang, Chan, & Tarrant, 2018; Xu, Binns, Zhang, Yang, & Zhao, 2010). Smoking causes adverse changes to the milk’s composition by reducing its protective properties (Napierala, Mazela, Merritt, & Florek, 2016). Mothers who quit smoking before pregnancy are more likely to initiate and continue breastfeeding (Carswell et al., 2018).

Communicable Disease Risks

Breastfeeding may transmit communicable diseases including HIV, hepatitis, cytomegalic virus, HTLV1, Ebola, Zika, and Flavi viruses. Brucellosis has also been reported (Tuon, Gondolfo, & Cerchiari, 2017). Because of the advantages of breastfeeding in many cases, particularly in resource-poor communities, the benefits of breastfeeding often outweigh other risks to the infant. While the WHO has given some reasons for not breastfeeding, in many cases in the decade since the publication of these guidelines, advances have allowed breastfeeding to continue (WHO, 2009). With HIV infection, the use of ART chemotherapy allows breastfeeding to continue (Fowler, Flynn, & Aizire, 2018).

HTLV1 is transmitted by breastfeeding, but this condition is only rarely screened for. Serologic screening in pregnant women is not required as a public health policy even in endemic countries such as Brazil. But if it is identified by chance, formula feeding may be the safer option if the conditions required for its safe use can be met (Oliveira, Kachimarek, & Bittencourt, 2018; Pasquier et al., 2018). Because the health advantages of breastfeeding are considered greater than the potential risk of transmission, the WHO recommends that mothers with possible or confirmed Zika virus infection or exposure continue to breastfeed (Mann et al., 2018). The management of hepatitis B has been changed by treatment and vaccination options (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018b; Qiu, Binns, Zhao, Zhang, & Xie, 2010).

Medications and other drugs may also be present in breastmilk. Most medications can still be used while breastfeeding (Anderson, 2018a, 2018b; Cuomo et al., 2018; Wong, Seto, Wong, Yuen, & Chan, 2018). However, the use of drugs of addiction requires special management (Reece-Stremtan & Marinelli, 2015). Breastmilk may also contain low levels of environmental contaminants. Since 1987 the WHO and United Nations Environment Programme have carried out worldwide monitoring of persistent organic pollutants, including dioxins, PCBs, and DDT in breastmilk. After reviewing three decades of data, van den Berg and colleagues (2017) concluded:

Based on our present knowledge, we conclude that the benefits of breastfeeding far outweigh the toxicological disadvantages that are associated with certain POPs. . . . Experimental and epidemiological studies indicate that future risk–benefit assessments should focus more on the in utero situation, rather than on the breastfeeding period. Consequently, the risk–benefit debate of breastfeeding may well be redundant (p. 94).

Breastfeeding–Nutritional Risks

Breastmilk is the most nutritionally complete food available. While breastmilk can be low in several nutrients, under most circumstances this does not cause any difficulty or public health solutions are available. Breastmilk is relatively low in iron, which is probably a defense mechanism against bacterial infection. Iron is present in the form of lactoferrin, which is readily absorbed. Mothers are usually given iron supplements to ensure adequate iron status at birth, and the introduction of appropriate complementary foods (iron-rich or iron-fortified foods) at 6 months overcomes this potential deficiency (WHO, 2016a). Excessive use of iron increases the risk of malaria in endemic countries. Over the age of 6 months, WHO (2016a) recommends iron supplementation for infants in regions where the prevalence of anemia is >40%.

Vitamin D deficiency in breastfed infants has been the subject of many studies. Some countries (e.g., the United States) recommend supplementation, while others (e.g., Australia) do not, unless the mother has been vitamin D deficient (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013; Taylor & Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 2018; Wagner, Greer, Sect, & Comm, 2008). The WHO (2019) does not recommend supplementation with vitamin D and states “further research is needed before specific recommendations can be made.”

Vitamin K is routinely given by injection to prevent neonatal hemorrhagic disease although in some countries an oral course may be substituted (Puckett & Offringa, 2000). The prophylactic use of vitamin K in infants is effective and safe (Sankar et al., 2016; Turck et al., 2017).

Iodine deficiency is widespread across many regions of the world; most countries use iodized salt, and mothers are supplemented during pregnancy (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2010). The WHO has recommended that where iodized salt consumption is adequate, no supplementation is required, but in other deficient areas mothers should continue to take iodine supplements during lactation (Andersson, de Benoist, Delange, & Zupan, 2008; Nazeri, Kabir, Dalili, Mirmiran, & Azizi, 2018). This situation needs to be carefully monitored as most sets of dietary guidelines recommend restricting salt use due to hypertension (C. W. Binns et al., 2017; Frieden & Bloomberg, 2018). Also agar from seaweed is no longer used as a thickener in food processing, which was an additional source of iodine (Nazeri, Tahmasebinejad, et al., 2018).

There is an increase in the use of breastmilk that has been expressed, stored, shared, or sold. This exposes infants to a number of potential risks including infection, contamination, and adulteration. Breastmilk gathered in low-income countries may be offered for commercial sale in richer countries, raising questions of safety and ethics (J. P. Smith, 2015). These include the age of the infant of the mother providing the milk (breastmilk composition changes over time) and the exploitation of women in low-income countries. The safe management and storage of expressed breastmilk is becoming an important public health issue (Peters, McArthur, & Munn, 2016; Picaud et al., 2018).

Environmental Benefits

Children are the population segment most susceptible to the effects of climate change, bearing an estimated 88% of the increased burden of disease (Philipsborn & Chan, 2018; Stanberry, Thomson, & James, 2018). The health benefits of breastfeeding will provide some protection against the effects of climate change. The SDGs, officially known as “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” were approved by the General Assembly in September 2015. They comprise a set of 17 interrelated goals with 169 more specific targets that are applicable to countries at all stages of economic development and include several references to the importance of breastfeeding (United Nations, 2017). Breastfeeding and appropriate introduction of complementary foods is the foundation of child health and development. The introduction of feeding breaks at places of employment, with political support, is an important intervention for promotion of the SDGs (Richter et al., 2017). The alternative to breastfeeding is infant formula, which is usually based on cow milk. While milk production in the 21st century is more efficient than in the past per unit of production, the total impact is greater due to increased production (Capper, Cady, & Bauman, 2009). Dairy milk production uses very large amounts of water, which will be in scarce supply as a result of climate change (Sultana, Uddin, Ridoutt, & Peters, 2014). Breastfeeding is the best protection for infants against the effects of climate change (C. Binns, Lee, Low, et al., 2017).

Disaster Situations

Infant feeding after disasters, including earthquakes and tsunamis, in conflict zones, and in other emergency situations provide challenges to parents, health services, and relief agencies. In situations of disaster or food insecurity, infants who are not breastfed have a markedly higher risk of infant mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases (Chantry, Eglash, & Labbok, 2015; Eidelman, 2013). After the Great Western China (Wenchuan) earthquake, large quantities of infant formula were donated with the familiar logos of the major formula quantities. The amounts were so large that stocks remained five years later and contributed to a marked increase in prelacteal feeds (C. W. Binns et al., 2012). A similar situation was noted after the Nepal earthquake (DeYoung, Suji, & Southall, 2018). Mothers who are injured or short of food can still continue breastfeeding and do not need formula. Of course, they do need clean water and food as soon as it can be obtained. Where formula must be used, health workers need to follow the highest ethical standards to avoid promoting infant formula to vulnerable communities in the post-recovery phase. Formula companies should donate supplies only in the quantities needed and in plain-labeled containers to avoid it becoming an advertising opportunity (C. W. Binns et al., 2012). After the Japanese earthquake and tsunami it was found that there was an increase in obesity, probably due to disruption of infant feeding (Yokomichi et al., 2018). In summary, in managing disasters every effort should be made to allow mothers to continue breastfeeding their infants to minimize additional morbidity and mortality.

Breastfeeding in the Arts

The arts reflect the views and practices of society and provide the means of discussion and advocacy of new ideas. It is informative to examine the ways breastfeeding has been portrayed in the many media of the arts. Until the mid- and late 19th century, breastfeeding was portrayed as natural part of human existence and indeed a noble virtue. Uruguay has promoted the health of its infants, including promoting breastfeeding, since its foundation and has a statue that includes a mother breastfeeding outside its parliamentary building (Birn, 2005). The temples and museums of Egypt contain many statues of the god Isis breastfeeding her son Horus (UNESCO, 2018). Even older are the clay statuettes in the Istanbul Archeological Museum of breastfeeding mothers. In the Christian Era the portrayal of a breastfeeding Madonna to show caring and nurturing has been a feature of Christian art. There are said to be 10,000 portraits of the breastfeeding Madonna (Madonna lactans) in the churches of Europe, but the best known are now in museums. Leonardo da Vinci’s wonderful painting “Madonna Litta” in the Hermitage, St Petersburg, is an excellent example. Another wonderful portrait is by Pierre-Auguste Renoir “A Woman Nursing a Child” in the National Gallery in Edinburgh, painted in 1894 (C. Binns, 2018).

Opera is the pinnacle of Western art but rarely, if ever, includes a portrayal of breastfeeding. However, a new work commissioned by Stuttgart Opera “Erdbeben Träume” (Earthquake Dreams) with music by the Japanese composer Toshio Hosokawa brings breastfeeding to the center of the stage. The opera is a series of images of how populations react to disasters. It tells the story of a major earthquake in Santiago, Chile, two centuries ago with many deaths and, amid the chaos, the survival of a child who is rescued and breastfed by a policewoman. The opera draws on the iconic image of a policewoman breastfeeding a baby after the Great Western China Earthquake of 2008, which went viral around the world (Zhu & Hu, 2009). There are many more examples of breastfeeding portrayed in art which can help to normalize the perceptions of breastfeeding in the community.

Breastfeeding in the Goals of International Organizations

Because of their importance to infant health, maternal well-being, overall public health, and a sustainable environment, goals and targets for breastfeeding are included in many international policy documents. The United Nations SDG 2 states “end hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round.” This includes promoting breastfeeding. “Breastfeeding is the smartest investment families, communities and countries can make” (p. 1) for the health of infants and the environment (C. Binns, Lee, Low, et al., 2017; United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, 2017). UNICEF and WHO have assessed the 2030 global targets for breastfeeding against current statistics and found that none of the 198 countries in the United Nations system are meeting the targets (UNICEF & WHO, 2018). The report notes that “less than half of newborns begin breastfeeding in the first hour after birth. 41% of infants less than 6 months of age are exclusively breastfed” (Selim, 2018; WHO, 2018c).

Action is required to support WHO and UNICEF to improve the collection of breastfeeding statistics and to monitor and promote the BFHI. There are important modifications needed to extend the WHO International Code on the Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes.

Conclusion

There are great public health benefits to be gained from promoting breastfeeding in reducing morbidity and mortality and improving the well-being of infants and mothers. Breastfeeding has always had important benefits for society, and in modern times it is more important than ever that the contribution of breastfeeding mothers toward healthier populations through cost savings and reducing stress on the environment be recognized by society.

In sum, the public health motto for infant feeding should be: “Babies are born to be breastfed, the more the better.”

Authoritative General Reference Sources on Breastfeeding

  • Lancet Breastfeeding Series (N. C. Rollins et al., 2016; Victora et al., 2016)

  • Ip et al., “Breastfeeding and Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes in Developed Countries” (Ip et al., 2007)

  • NHMRC Infant Feeding Guidelines (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013)

  • NHMRC Infant Feeding Guidelines Evidence Report (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2012)

  • U.S. Surgeon General Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011)

  • CDC Breastfeeding report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018a)

  • WCRF Cancer Update (World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research, 2017)

  • WHO, “Support for Mothers to Initiate and Establish Breastfeeding After Childbirth,” ELENA (WHO, 2018c)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the following colleagues who have reviewed this manuscript for content:

  • Prof. Jane Scott, School of Public Health, Curtin University

  • Prof. Liqian Qiu, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China

  • Dr. Dat Van Duong, Sexual and Reproductive Health Specialist, UNFPA Vietnam

  • Prof. Masaharu Kagawa, Kagawa Nutrition University, Japan

  • Prof. Tomiko Hokama, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan

  • Ms. Li-Yin Lin, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan R.O.C

  • Dr. Syahrul Bariah Abdul Hamid, Centre of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi, Mara, Malaysia

  • Prof. Keiko Nanishi, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo

  • Dr. Li Tang, Sichuan Jinxin Women and Children Hospital, Chengdu, PR China

  • Dr. Raheema Abdul Raheem, Dean of Research, Maldives National University

  • Prof. Indika Karunathilake, Professor in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

  • Dr. Kwabena Obeng Duedu, School of Basic & Biomedical Sciences, University of Health & Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana

  •  

  • Sole responsibility for the content in the final version lies with the authors.

References

Abdulraheem, R., & Binns, C. W. (2007). The infant feeding practices of mothers in the Maldives. Public Health Nutrition, 10(5), 502–507.Find this resource:

Ajmera, V. H., Terrault, N. A., VanWagner, L. B., Sarkar, M., Lewis, C. E., Carr, J. J., & Gunderson, E. P. (2019). Longer lactation duration is associated with decreased prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in women. Journal of Hepatology, 70(1), 126–132.Find this resource:

Ali, A. T. (2018). Towards prevention of ovarian cancer. Current Cancer Drug Targets, 18(6), 522–537.Find this resource:

Allen, L. H., & Dror, D. K. (2018). Introduction to current knowledge on micronutrients in human milk: Adequacy, analysis, and need for research. Advances in Nutrition, 9(Suppl. 1), 275S–277S.Find this resource:

Anderson, P. O. (2018a). Drugs in lactation. Pharmaceutical Research, 35(3), 45.Find this resource:

Anderson, P. O. (2018b). Topical drugs in nursing mothers. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(1), 5–7.Find this resource:

Andersson, M., de Benoist, B., Delange, F., & Zupan, J. (2008). Prevention and control of iodine deficiency in pregnant and lactating women and in children less than 2-years-old: Conclusions and recommendations of the Technical Consultation. Public Health Nutrition, 11(3), 327.Find this resource:

Anttila-Hughes, J. K., Fernald, L. C. H., Gertler, P. J., Krause, P., & Wydick, B. (2018). Mortality from marketing of infant formula in low and middle-income countries. NBER Working Paper No. 24452. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Find this resource:

Aryeetey, R., & Dykes, F. (2018). Global implications of the new WHO and UNICEF implementation guidance on the revised Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 14(3), e12637.Find this resource:

Avalos, L., Flanagan, T., & Li, D. (2019). Preventing perinatal depression to improve maternal and child health—A health care imperative. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(4), 313–314.Find this resource:

Baker, P., Smith, J., Salmon, L., Friel, S., Kent, G., Iellamo, A., & Renfrew, M. J. (2016). Global trends and patterns of commercial milk-based formula sales: Is an unprecedented infant and young child feeding transition underway? Public Health Nutrition, 19(14), 2540–2550.Find this resource:

Barnard, N. D., Willett, W. C., & Ding, E. L. (2017). The misuse of meta-analysis in nutrition research. JAMA, 318(15), 1435–1436.Find this resource:

Bartick, M. (2011). Breastfeeding and the U.S. economy. Breastfeeding Medicine, 6, 313–318.Find this resource:

Bartick, M. (2013). Mothers’ costs of suboptimal breastfeeding: Implications of the maternal disease cost analysis. Breastfeeding Medicine, 8(5), 448–449.Find this resource:

Bartick, M., & Reinhold, A. (2010). The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: A pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics, 125(5), e1048–e1056.Find this resource:

Bartick, M. C., Schwarz, E. B., Green, B. D., Jegier, B. J., Reinhold, A. G., Colaizy, T. T., & Stuebe, A. M. (2017). Suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: Maternal and pediatric health outcomes and costs. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13(1).Find this resource:

Bartick, M. C., Stuebe, A. M., Schwarz, E. B., Luongo, C., Reinhold, A. G., & Foster, E. M. (2013). Cost analysis of maternal disease associated with suboptimal breastfeeding Obstetrics & Gynecology, 122(1), 111–119.Find this resource:

Berens, P., & Labbok, M. (2014). ABM Clinical Protocol #13: Contraception during breastfeeding, revised 2015. Breastfeeding Medicine, 10(1).Find this resource:

Berry, N., Jones, S. J., & Iverson, D. (2012). Toddler milk advertising in Australia: Infant formula advertising in disguise? Australasian Marketing Journal, 20, 24–27.Find this resource:

Binns, C. (2018). From depression to dietary guidelines: A life’s journey. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72(12), 1597–1602.Find this resource:

Binns, C., Lee, M. K., & Kagawa, M. (2017). Ethical challenges in infant feeding research. Nutrients, 9(1), 59.Find this resource:

Binns, C., Lee, M. K., Kagawa, M., Low, W. Y., Scott, J., Lee, A., & Karunathilake, I. (2018). Infant feeding guidelines for the Asia Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 30(8), 682–690.Find this resource:

Binns, C., Lee, M. K., Low, W. Y., & Zerfas, A. (2017). The role of public health nutrition in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the Asia Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 29(7), 617–624.Find this resource:

Binns, C. W. (1976). Food, sickness and death in children of the highlands of Papua, New Guinea. The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics and Environmental Child Health, 22(1), 9–11.Find this resource:

Binns, C. W., Fraser, M. L., Lee, A. H., & Scott, J. (2009). Defining exclusive breastfeeding in Australia. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 45(4), 174–180.Find this resource:

Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Ovarian cancer and breastfeeding: The public health costs of low rates of breastfeeding in Korea. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Public Health Conference, Seoul, Korea.Find this resource:

Binns, C. W., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Exclusive breastfeeding for six months: The WHO six months recommendation in the Asia Pacific Region. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 23(3), 344–350.Find this resource:

Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., Sauer, K., & Hewitt, K. (2012). Reported breastfeeding rates in the Asia Pacific region. Current Pediatric Reviews, 8(4), 339–345.Find this resource:

Binns, C. W., Lee, M. K., Kagawa, M., Low, W. Y., Liqian, Q., Guldan, G. S., & Zerfas, A. (2017). Dietary guidelines for the Asia Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 29(2), 98–101.Find this resource:

Binns, C. W., Lee, M. K., Tang, L., Yu, C., Hokama, T., & Lee, A. (2012). Ethical issues in infant feeding after disasters. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 24(4), 672–680.Find this resource:

Birn, A. E. (2005). Uruguay on the world stage: How child health became an international priority. American Journal of Public Health, 95(9), 1506–1517.Find this resource:

Boerma, T., Ronsmans, C., Melesse, D. Y., Barros, A. J. D., Barros, F. C., Juan, L., & Temmerman, M. (2018). Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet, 392(10155), 1341–1348.Find this resource:

Bonifacino, E., Schwartz, E. B., Jun, H., Wessel, C. B., & Corbelli, J. A. (2018). Effect of lactation on maternal hypertension: A systematic review. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(9), 578–588.Find this resource:

Borkhoff, C. M., Dai, D. W. H., Jairam, J. A., Wong, P. D., Cox, K. A., Maguire, J. L., . . . Parkin, P. C. (2018). Breastfeeding to 12 mo and beyond: Nutrition outcomes at 3 to 5 y of age. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 108(2), 354–362.Find this resource:

Boue, G., Cummins, E., Guillou, S., Antignac, J. P., Le Bizec, B., & Membre, J. M. (2018). Public health risks and benefits associated with breast milk and infant formula consumption. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58(1), 126–145.Find this resource:

Brown, A. (2017). Breastfeeding as a public health responsibility: A review of the evidence. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 30(6), 759–770.Find this resource:

Callen, J., & Pinelli, J. (2004). Incidence and duration of breastfeeding for term infants in Canada, United States, Europe, and Australia: A literature review. Birth, 31(4), 285–292.Find this resource:

Capper, J. L., Cady, R. A., & Bauman, D. E. (2009). The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science, 87(6), 2160–2167.Find this resource:

Carswell, A. L., Ward, K. D., Vander Weg, M. W., Scarinci, I. C., Girsch, L., Read, M., & Chen, W. Y. (2018). Prospective associations of breastfeeding and smoking cessation among low-income pregnant women. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 14(4).Find this resource:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018a). Breastfeeding. Atlanta, GA: Author.Find this resource:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018b). Hepatitis B or C infections. Atlanta, GA: Author.Find this resource:

Chamberlain, C. R., Wilson, A. N., Amir, L. H., O’Dea, K., Campbell, S., Leonard, D., & Wolfe, R. (2017). Low rates of predominant breastfeeding in hospital after gestational diabetes, particularly among Indigenous women in Australia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 41(2), 144–150.Find this resource:

Chantry, C. J., Eglash, A., & Labbok, M. (2015). ABM position on breastfeeding—revised 2015. Breastfeeding Medicine, 10(9), 407–411.Find this resource:

Chen, C., Yan, Y., Gao, X., Xiang, S. T., He, Q., Zeng, G. Y., & Li, L. (2018). Influences of Cesarean delivery on breastfeeding practices and duration: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Human Lactation, 34(3), 526–534.Find this resource:

Chong, C. Y. L., Bloomfield, F. H., & O’Sullivan, J. M. (2018). Factors affecting gastrointestinal microbiome development in neonates. Nutrients, 10(3).Find this resource:

Cohen, S. S., Alexander, D. D., Krebs, N. F., Young, B. E., Cabana, M. D., Erdmann, P., & Saavedra, J. M. (2018). Factors associated with breastfeeding initiation and continuation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatrics, 203, 190–196.Find this resource:

Colaizy, T. T., Bartick, M. C., Jegier, B. J., Green, B. D., Reinhold, A. G., Schaefer, A. J., . . . Stuebe, A. M. (2016). Impact of optimized breastfeeding on the costs of necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely low birthweight infants. Journal of Pediatrics, 175, 100–105.Find this resource:

Collaboration for Breast Cancer. (2002). Breast cancer and breastfeeding: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. The Lancet, 360(9328), 187–195.Find this resource:

Cresswell, J. A., Ganaba, R., Sarrassat, S., Some, H., Diallo, A. H., Cousens, S., & Filippi, V. (2019). The effect of the Alive & Thrive initiative on exclusive breastfeeding in rural Burkina Faso: A repeated cross-sectional cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Global Health, 7(3), e357–365.Find this resource:

Cuomo, A., Maina, G., Neal, S. M., De Montis, G., Rosso, G., Scheggi, S., & Fagiolini, A. (2018). Using sertraline in postpartum and breastfeeding: balancing risks and benefits. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 17(7), 719–725.Find this resource:

DeYoung, S., Suji, M., & Southall, H. G. (2018). Maternal perceptions of infant feeding and health in the context of the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. Journal of Human Lactation, 34(2), 242–252.Find this resource:

Dror, D. K., & Allen, L. H. (2018). Overview of nutrients in human milk. Advances in Nutrition, 9(Suppl. 1), 278S–294S.Find this resource:

Duong, D. V. (2012). Breastfeeding, sexuality and contraception during the postpartum period. Current Pediatric Reviews, 8(4), 332–338.Find this resource:

Dutton, H., Borengasser, S. J., Gaudet, L. M., Barbour, L. A., & Keely, E. J. (2018). Obesity in pregnancy: Optimizing outcomes for Mom and Baby. Medical Clinics, 102(1), 87–106.Find this resource:

Eidelman, A. I. (2013). Breastfeeding mitigates a disaster. Breastfeeding Medicine, 8(3), 2.Find this resource:

ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition, Agostoni, C., Braegger, C., Decsi, T., Kolacek, S., Koletzko, B., & van Goudoever, J. (2009). Breast-feeding: A commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 49(1), 112–125.Find this resource:

European Commission. (2010). European Perinatal Health Report: Health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010.Find this resource:

Faintuch, J., & Faintuch, S. (2018). Prolonged baby–nursing–related sphygmomanometric protection: Breast, brain, blood biomolecules, or bacteria? American Journal of Hypertension, 31(5), 534–536.Find this resource:

Feng, L. J., Xu, Q. L., Hu, Z. F., & Pan, H. Y. (2018). Lactation and progression to type 2 diabetes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Journal of Diabetes Investigation, 9(6), 1360–1369.Find this resource:

Flores, T. R., Mielke, G. I., Wendt, A., Nunes, B. P., & Bertoldi, A. D. (2018). Prepregnancy weight excess and cessation of exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72(4), 480–488.Find this resource:

Forbes, J. D., Azad, M. B., Vehling, L., Tun, H. M., Konya, T. B., Guttman, D. S., . . . CHILD Investigators. (2018). Association of exposure to formula in the hospital and subsequent infant feeding practices with gut microbiota and risk of overweight in the first year of life. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(7).Find this resource:

Fowler, M. G., Flynn, P., & Aizire, J. (2018). What is new in perinatal HIV prevention? Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 30(1), 144–151.Find this resource:

Frieden, T. R., & Bloomberg, M. R. (2018). Saving an additional 100 million lives. The Lancet, 391(10121), 709–712.Find this resource:

Gaufin, T., Tobin, N. H., & Aldrovandi, G. M. (2018). The importance of the microbiome in pediatrics and pediatric infectious diseases. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 30(1), 117–124.Find this resource:

Giang, H. T. M., Ulrich, S., Tran, H. T., & Pozza, S. B. D. (2018). Monitoring and interventions are needed to reduce the very high Caesarean section rates in Vietnam. Acta Paediatrica, 107(12), 2109–2114.Find this resource:

Gilbert, J. A., Blaser, M. J., Caporaso, J. G., Jansson, J. K., Lynch, S. V., & Knight, R. (2018). Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nature Medicine, 24(4), 392–400.Find this resource:

Giordano, J. C., Nascimento, S. L., Godoy-Miranda, A. C., & Surita, F. G. (2019). The misleading choice for safer births in Brazilian’s most developed region: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 32(5), 718–723.Find this resource:

Haider, M. R., Rahman, M. M., Moinuddin, M., Rahman, A. E., Ahmed, S., & Khan, M. M. (2018). Ever-increasing Caesarean section and its economic burden in Bangladesh. PLoS One, 13(12).Find this resource:

Hampel, D., Dror, D. K., & Allen, L. H. (2018). Micronutrients in human milk: Analytical methods. Advances in Nutrition, 9(Suppl. 1), 313S–331S.Find this resource:

Hassiotou, F., & Hartmann, P. E. (2014). At the dawn of a new discovery: The potential of breast milk stem cells. Advances in Nutrition, 5(6), 770–778.Find this resource:

Hellmuth, C., Uhl, O., Demmelmair, H., Grunewald, M., Auricchio, R., Castillejo, G., & Kirchberg, F. F. (2018). The impact of human breast milk components on the infant metabolism. PLoS One, 13(6).Find this resource:

Heshmati, J., Sepidarkish, M., Shidfar, F., Shokri, F., Vesali, S., Akbari, M., & Omani-Samani, R. (2018). Effect of breastfeeding in early life on cardiorespiratory and physical fitness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(4), 248–258.Find this resource:

Holowko, N., Jones, M., Koupil, I., Tooth, L., & Mishra, G. (2016). High education and increased parity are associated with breast-feeding initiation and duration among Australian women. Public Health Nutrition, 19(14), 2551–2561.Find this resource:

Horta, B. L., Hartwig, F. P., & Victora, C. G. (2018). Breastfeeding and intelligence in adulthood: Due to genetic confounding? The Lancet Global Health, 6(12), e1276–e1277.Find this resource:

Huang, Y., Ouyang, Y. Q., & Redding, S. R. (2019). Previous breastfeeding experience and its influence on breastfeeding outcomes in subsequent births: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 32(4), 303–309.Find this resource:

Hurlimann, T., Pena-Rosas, J. P., Saxena, A., Zamora, G., & Godard, B. (2017). Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review. PLoS One, 12(10), e0186897.Find this resource:

Inoue, M., Binns, C. W., Otsuka, K., Jimba, M., & Matsubara, M. (2012). Infant feeding practices and breastfeeding duration in Japan: A review. International Breastfeeding Journal, 7(1), 15.Find this resource:

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). The challenge of reforming nutritional epidemiologic research. JAMA, 320(10), 969–970.Find this resource:

Iozzo, P., & Sanguinetti, E. (2018). Early dietary patterns and microbiota development: Still a way to go from descriptive interactions to health-relevant solutions. Frontiers in Nutrition, 5, 5.Find this resource:

Ip, S., Chung, M., Raman, G., Chew, P., Magula, N., DeVine, D., & Lau, J. (2007). Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evidence Report: Technology Assessment, 153, 1–186.Find this resource:

Ip, S., Chung, M., Raman, G., Trikalinos, T. A., & Lau, J. (2009). A summary of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s evidence report on breastfeeding in developed countries. Breastfeeding Medicine, 4(Suppl. 1), S17–S30.Find this resource:

Jacobson, L. T., Hade, E. M., Collins, T. C., Margolis, K. L., Waring, M. E., Van Horn, L. V., & Stefanick, M. L. (2018). Breastfeeding history and risk of stroke among parous postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7(17), e008739.Find this resource:

Kim, J. H., Shin, J. C., & Donovan, S. M. (2019). Effectiveness of workplace lactation interventions on breastfeeding outcomes in the United States: An updated systematic review. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(1), 100–113., 890334418765464.Find this resource:

Kramer, M. S., Chalmers, B., Hodnett, E. D., Sevkovskaya, Z., Dzikovich, I., & Shapiro, S., Helsing, E. (2001). PROmotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): A randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA, 285(4), 413–420.Find this resource:

Kuliukas, L., Hauck, Y. L., Jorgensen, A., Kneebone, K., Burns, S. K., Maycock, B. R., & Scott, J. A. (2019). Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: Perceptions of facilitators and participants. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 48.Find this resource:

Lakati, A., Binns, C., & Stevenson, M. (2002a). Breast-feeding and the working mother in Nairobi. Public Health Nutrition, 5(6), 715–718.Find this resource:

Lakati, A., Binns, C., & Stevenson, M. (2002b). The effect of work status on exclusive breastfeeding in Nairobi. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 14(2), 85–90.Find this resource:

Lessen, R., & Kavanagh, K. (2015). Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: promoting and supporting breastfeeding. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 115(3), 444–449.Find this resource:

Lim, G., Facco, F. L., Nathan, N., Waters, J. H., Wong, C. A., & Eltzschig, H. K. (2018). A review of the impact of obstetric anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Anesthesiology, 129(1), 192–215.Find this resource:

Liu, P., Qiao, L., Xu, F., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., & Binns, C. W. (2013). Factors associated with breastfeeding duration: A 30-month cohort study in northwest China. Journal of Human Lactation, 29(2), 253–259.Find this resource:

Lok, K. Y. W., Wang, M. P., Chan, V. H. S., & Tarrant, M. (2018). The effect of secondary cigarette smoke from household members on breastfeeding duration: A prospective cohort study. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(6), 412–417.Find this resource:

Lopez-Fernandez, G., Barrios, M., Goberna-Tricas, J., & Gomez-Benito, J. (2017). Breastfeeding during pregnancy: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 30(6), e292–e300.Find this resource:

Lyons, S., Currie, S., Peters, S., Lavender, T., & Smith, D. M. (2018). The association between psychological factors and breastfeeding behaviour in women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg m–2: A systematic review. Maternal Obesity, 19(7), 947–959.Find this resource:

Mahesh, P. K. B., Gunathunga, M. W., Arnold, S. M., Jayasinghe, C., Pathirana, S., & Makarim, M. F., Senanayake, S. J. (2018). Effectiveness of targeting fathers for breastfeeding promotion: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1140.Find this resource:

Mangrio, E., Persson, K., & Bramhagen, A. C. (2018). Sociodemographic, physical, mental and social factors in the cessation of breastfeeding before 6 months: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(2), 451–465.Find this resource:

Mann, T. Z., Haddad, L. B., Williams, T. R., Hills, S. L., Read, J. S., Dee, D. L., & Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K. (2018). Breast milk transmission of flaviviruses in the context of Zika virus: A systematic review. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 32(4), 358–368.Find this resource:

Martens, P. J. (2012). What do Kramer’s Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative PROBIT studies tell us? A review of a decade of research. Journal of Human Lactation, 28(3), 335–342.Find this resource:

Matvienko-Sikar, K., Griffin, C., McGrath, N., Toomey, E., Byrne, M., Kelly, C., & Kearney, P. M. (2018). Developing a core outcome set for childhood obesity prevention: A systematic review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 15, e12680.Find this resource:

Maycock, B., Binns, C. W., Dhaliwal, S., Tohotoa, J., Hauck, Y., Burns, S., & Howat, P. (2013). Education and support for fathers improves breastfeeding rates: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Human Lactation, 29(4), 484–490.Find this resource:

McAllister, D. A., Liu, L., Shi, T., Chu, Y., Reed, C., Burrows, J., & Nair, H. (2019). Global, regional, and national estimates of pneumonia morbidity and mortality in children younger than 5 years between 2000 and 2015: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 7(1), e47–e57.Find this resource:

McCallister, M., Medrano, R., & Wojcicki, J. (2018). Early life obesity increases the risk for asthma in San Francisco born Latina girls. Allergy Asthma Proc, 39(4), 273–280.Find this resource:

McKay, F. H., Cheng, C., Wright, A., Shill, J., Stephens, H., & Uccellini, M. (2018). Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(1), 22–30.Find this resource:

Mercier, R. J., Burcher, T. A., Horowitz, R., & Wolf, A. (2018). Differences in breastfeeding among Medicaid and commercially insured patients: A retrospective cohort study. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(4), 286–291.Find this resource:

Mezzavilla, R. S., Ferreira, M. F., Curioni, C. C., Lindsay, A. C., & Hasselmann, M. H. (2018). Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review of observational studies. Journal of Pediatrics, 94(3), 226–237.Find this resource:

Mihrshahi, S., & Baur, L. A. (2018). What exposures in early life are risk factors for childhood obesity? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 54(12), 1294–1298.Find this resource:

Miliku, K., & Azad, M. B. (2018). Breastfeeding and the developmental origins of asthma: Current evidence, possible mechanisms, and future research priorities. Nutrients, 10(8).Find this resource:

Molenaar, N. M., Kamperman, A. M., Boyce, P., & Bergink, V. (2018). Guidelines on treatment of perinatal depression with antidepressants: An international review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(4), 320–327.Find this resource:

Moon, R. Y., & Hauck, F. R. (2018). Risk factors and theories. In J. R. Duncan & R. W. Byard (Eds.), SIDS: Sudden infant and early childhood death: The past, the present and the future. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide Press.Find this resource:

Moossavi, S., Miliku, K., Sepehri, S., Khafipour, E., & Azad, M. B. (2018). The prebiotic and probiotic properties of human milk: Implications for infant immune development and pediatric asthma. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 6, 197.Find this resource:

Mortensen, E. L. (2015). Life course consequences of breastfeeding. The Lancet Global Health, 3(4), e179–e180.Find this resource:

Napierala, M., Mazela, J., Merritt, T. A., & Florek, E. (2016). Tobacco smoking and breastfeeding: Effect on the lactation process, breast milk composition and infant development. A critical review. Environmental Research, 151, 321–338.Find this resource:

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2010). Iodine supplementation for pregnant and breastfeeding women. Canberra, Australia: Author.Find this resource:

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2012). Infant feeding guidelines: Information for health workers. Canberra, Australia: Author.Find this resource:

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2013). Infant feeding guidelines for health workers. Canberra, Australia: Author.Find this resource:

Navarro-Rosenblatt, D., & Garmendia, M. L. (2018). Maternity leave and its impact on breastfeeding: A review of the literature. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(9), 589–597.Find this resource:

Nazeri, P., Kabir, A., Dalili, H., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F. (2018). Breast-milk iodine concentrations and iodine levels of infants according to the iodine status of the country of residence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid, 28(1), 124–138.Find this resource:

Nazeri, P., Tahmasebinejad, Z., Mehrabi, Y., Hedayati, M., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F. (2018). Lactating mothers and infants residing in an area with an effective salt iodization program have no need for iodine supplements: Results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial. Thyroid, 28(11), 1547–1558.Find this resource:

O’Connor, E., Senger, C., Henninger, M., Coppola, E., & Gaynes, B. (2019). Interventions to prevent perinatal depression: Evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA, 321(6), 588–601.Find this resource:

O’Doherty, K. C., Virani, A., & Wilcox, E. S. (2016). The human microbiome and public health: social and ethical considerations. American Journal of Public Health, 106(3), 414–420.Find this resource:

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2010). Maternal, infant, and child health. Washington, DC: Author.Find this resource:

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2019). Maternal, infant, and child health. Washington, DC: Author.Find this resource:

Oliveira, P. D., Kachimarek, A. C., & Bittencourt, A. L. (2018). Early onset of HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL): Systematic search and review. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 64(2), 151–161.Find this resource:

Otsuki, S., Saito, E., Sawada, N., Abe, S. K., Hidaka, A., Yamaji, T., & Grp, J. S. (2018). Female reproductive factors and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among women: The Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC study). Annals of Epidemiology, 28(9), 597–604.Find this resource:

Palou, M., Pico, C., & Palou, A. (2018). Leptin as a breast milk component for the prevention of obesity. Nutrition Reviews, 76(12), 875–892.Find this resource:

Pasquier, A., Alais, S., Roux, L., Thoulouze, M. I., Alvarez, K., Journo, C., & Mahieux, R. (2018). How to control HTLV-1-associated diseases: Preventing de novo cellular infection using antiviral therapy. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 278.Find this resource:

Patel, A. L., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Human milk and necrotizing enterocolitis. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, 27(1), 34–38.Find this resource:

Patel, R., Oken, E., Bogdanovich, N., Matush, L., Sevkovskaya, Z., Chalmers, B., & Martin, R. M. (2014). Cohort profile: The PROmotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT). International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(3), 679–690.Find this resource:

Patnode, C. D., Henninger, M. L., Senger, C. A., Perdue, L. A., & Whitlock, E. P. (2016). Primary care interventions to support breastfeeding: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA, 316(16), 1694–1705.Find this resource:

Patterson, J. A., Keuler, N. S., & Olson, B. H. (2019). The effect of maternity practices on exclusive breastfeeding rates in US hospitals. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 15(1).Find this resource:

Perez-Escamilla, R., Martinez, J. L., & Segura-Perez, S. (2016). Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: A systematic review. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 12(3), 402–417.Find this resource:

Peters, M. D. J., McArthur, A., & Munn, Z. (2016). Safe management of expressed breast milk: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 29(6), 473–481.Find this resource:

Petherick, A. (2010). Mother’s milk: A rich opportunity. Nature, 468(7327), S5–S7.Find this resource:

Philipsborn, R. P., & Chan, K. (2018). Climate change and global child health. Pediatrics, 141(6).Find this resource:

Phukan, D., Ranjan, M., & Dwivedi, L. K. (2018). Impact of timing of breastfeeding initiation on neonatal mortality in India. International Breastfeeding Journal, 13, 27.Find this resource:

Picaud, J. C., Buffin, R., Gremmo-Feger, G., Rigo, J., Putet, G., Casper, C., & Working group of the French Neonatal Society on Fresh Human Milk Use in Preterm Infants. (2018). Review concludes that specific recommendations are needed to harmonise the provision of fresh mother’s milk to their preterm infants. Acta Paediatrica, 107(7), 1145–1155.Find this resource:

Pollak, K. I., Fish, L. J., Lyna, P., Peterson, B. L., Swamy, G. K., & Levine, M. D. (2015). Predictors of pregnant quitters’ intention to return to smoking postpartum. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(6), 742–745.Find this resource:

Prior, E., Santhakumaran, S., Gale, C., Philipps, L. H., Modi, N., & Hyde, M. J. (2012). Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95(5), 1113–1135.Find this resource:

Puckett, R. M., & Offringa, M. (2000). Prophylactic vitamin K for vitamin K deficiency bleeding in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4.Find this resource:

Qiu, L., Binns, C., Zhao, Y., Lee, A., & Xie, X. (2008). Breastfeeding following caesarean section in Zhejiang Province: Public health implications. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 20(Suppl.), 220–227.Find this resource:

Qiu, L., Binns, C. W., Zhao, Y., Zhang, K., & Xie, X. (2010). Hepatitis B and breastfeeding in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China. Breastfeeding Medicine, 5(3), 109–112.Find this resource:

Qu, G., Wang, L., Tang, X., Wu, W., & Sun, Y. (2018). Association between duration of breastfeeding and maternal hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(5), 318–326.Find this resource:

Ratnayake, H. E., & Rowel, D. (2018). Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and barriers for its continuation up to six months in Kandy district, Sri Lanka. International Breastfeeding Journal, 13, 36.Find this resource:

Reece-Stremtan, S., & Marinelli, K. A. (2015). ABM Clinical Protocol #21: Guidelines for breastfeeding and substance use or substance use disorder, revised 2015. Breastfeeding Medicine, 10(3), 135–141.Find this resource:

Richter, L. M., Daelmans, B., Lombardi, J., Heymann, J., Boo, F. L., Behrman, J. R., & Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee. (2017). Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: Pathways to scale up for early childhood development. The Lancet, 389(10064), 103–118.Find this resource:

Rollins, N., & Doherty, T. (2019). Improving breastfeeding practices at scale. The Lancet Global Health, 7(3), e292–e293.Find this resource:

Rollins, N. C., Bhandari, N., Hajeebhoy, N., Horton, S., Lutter, C. K., Martines, J. C., & Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. (2016). Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? The Lancet, 387(10017), 491–504.Find this resource:

Sandall, J., Tribe, R. M., Avery, L., Mola, G., Visser, G. H. A., Homer, C. S. E., . . . Temmerman, M. (2018). Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet, 392(10155), 1349–1357.Find this resource:

Sankar, M. J., Chandrasekaran, A., Kumar, P., Thukral, A., Agarwal, R., & Paul, V. K. (2016). Vitamin K prophylaxis for prevention of vitamin K deficiency bleeding: A systematic review. Journal of Perinatology, 36, S29–S34.Find this resource:

Sarki, M., Parlesak, A., & Robertson, A. (2019). Comparison of national cross-sectional breast-feeding surveys by maternal education in Europe (2006–2016). Public Health Nutrition, 22(5), 848–861.Find this resource:

Sauter, E. R. (2018). Breast cancer prevention: Current approaches and future directions. European Journal of Breast Health, 14(2), 64–71.Find this resource:

Scott, J. A., & Binns, C. W. (1999). Factors associated with the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: A review of the literature. Breastfeeding Reviews, 7(1), 5–16.Find this resource:

Scott, J. A., Binns, C. W., Oddy, W. H., & Graham, K. I. (2006a). Predictors of breastfeeding duration: Evidence from a cohort study. Pediatrics, 117(4), e646–e655.Find this resource:

Selim, L. (2018). Breastfeeding from the first hour of birth: What works and what hurts. New York, NY: UNICEF.Find this resource:

Smith, J., Galtry, J., & Salmon, L. (2014). Confronting the formula feeding epidemic in a new era of trade and investment liberalisation. The Journal of Australian Political Economy, 73, 133–171.Find this resource:

Smith, J. P. (2013). “Lost milk?”: Counting the economic value of breast milk in gross domestic product. Journal of Human Lactation, 29(4), 537–546.Find this resource:

Smith, J. P. (2015). Markets, breastfeeding and trade in mothers’ milk. International Breastfeeding Journal, 10, 9.Find this resource:

Smith, J. P., Thompson, J. F., & Ellwood, D. A. (2002). Hospital system costs of artificial infant feeding: Estimates for the Australian Capital Territory. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 26(6), 543–551.Find this resource:

Stanberry, L. R., Thomson, M. C., & James, W. (2018). Prioritizing the needs of children in a changing climate. PLoS Medicine, 15(7), e1002627.Find this resource:

Stiemsma, L. T., & Michels, K. B. (2018). The role of the microbiome in the developmental origins of health and disease. Pediatrics, 141(4).Find this resource:

Stuebe, A. M., Jegier, B. J., Schwarz, E. B., Green, B. D., Reinhold, A. G., Colaizy, T. T., & Bartick, M. C. (2017). An online calculator to estimate the impact of changes in breastfeeding rates on population health and costs. Breastfeeding Medicine, 12(10), 645–658.Find this resource:

Su, D., Pasalich, M., Lee, A. H., & Binns, C. W. (2013). Ovarian cancer risk is reduced by prolonged lactation: A case-control study in southern China. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 97(2), 354–359.Find this resource:

Sultana, M. N., Uddin, M. M., Ridoutt, B. G., & Peters, K. J. (2014). Comparison of water use in global milk production for different typical farms. Agricultural Systems, 129, 9–21.Find this resource:

Snyder, G. G., Holzman, C., Sun, T., Bullen, B., Bertolet, M., & Catov, J. M. (2019). Breastfeeding Greater Than 6 Months Is Associated with Smaller Maternal Waist Circumference Up to One Decade After Delivery. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 28(4), 462–472.Find this resource:

Tadevosyan, M., Ghazaryan, A., Harutyunyan, A., Petrosyan, V., Atherly, A., & Hekimian, K. (2019). Factors contributing to rapidly increasing rates of cesarean section in Armenia: A partially mixed concurrent quantitative-qualitative equal status study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19.Find this resource:

Takeda, S., Takeda, J., Murakami, K., Kubo, T., Hamada, H., Murakami, M., & Ikeda, T. (2017). Annual report of the Perinatology Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015: Proposal of urgent measures to reduce maternal deaths. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 43(1), 5–7.Find this resource:

Tambalis, K. D., Mourtakos, S., Panagiotakos, D. B., & Sidossis, L. S. (2018). Association of exclusive breastfeeding with risk of obesity in childhood and early adulthood. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(10), 687–693.Find this resource:

Tang, L., Binns, C. W., Luo, C., Zhong, Z., & Lee, A. H. (2013). Determinants of breastfeeding at discharge in rural China. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 22(3), 443–448.Find this resource:

Taylor, S. N., & Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. (2018). ABM Clinical Protocol #29: Iron, zinc, and vitamin D supplementation during breastfeeding. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(6), 398–404.Find this resource:

Theurich, M. A., Weikert, C., Abraham, K., & Koletzko, B. (2018). Breastfeeding rate and promotion in selected European countries. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 61(8), 926–936.Find this resource:

Tuon, F. F., Gondolfo, R. B., & Cerchiari, N. (2017). Human-to-human transmission of Brucella—A systematic review. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 22(5), 539–546.Find this resource:

Turck, D., Bresson, J. L., Burlingame, B., Dean, T., Fairweather-Tait, S., Heinonen, M., . . . Neuhäuser‐Berthold, M. (2017). Dietary reference values for vitamin K. EFSA Journal, 15(5).Find this resource:

Unar-Munguia, M., Torres-Mejia, G., Colchero, M. A., & Gonzalez de Cosio, T. (2017). Breastfeeding mode and risk of breast cancer: A dose-response meta-analysis. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(2), 422–434.Find this resource:

UNESCO. (2018). Isis nursing Horus. Paris, France: Author.Find this resource:

UNICEF. (2016). The state of the world’s children 2016; A fair chance for every child. New York, NY: Author.Find this resource:

UNICEF. (2017). The first 1,000 days. New York, NY: Author.Find this resource:

UNICEF. (2018). Infant and young child feeding. New York, NY: Author.Find this resource:

UNICEF, & World Health Organization. (2018). Global breastfeeding scorecard. New York, NY: Authors.Find this resource:

United Nations. (2017). Transforming our world: SDG goals and targets. New York, NY: Author.Find this resource:

United Nations Subcommittee on Nutrition. (2015). By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition and leave no one behind. New York, NY: Author.Find this resource:

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. (2017). Breastfeeding is “smartest investment” families, communities and countries can make—UN. New York, NY: Author.Find this resource:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). The Surgeon General’s call to action to support breastfeeding. Washington, DC: Author.Find this resource:

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2019). Interventions to prevent perinatal depression: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA, 321(6), 580–587.Find this resource:

van den Berg, M., Kypke, K., Kotz, A., Tritscher, A., Lee, S. Y., Magulova, K., & Malisch, R. (2017). WHO/UNEP global surveys of PCDDs, PCDFs, PCBs and DDTs in human milk and benefit-risk evaluation of breastfeeding. Archives of Toxicology, 91(1), 83–96.Find this resource:

Van der Wijden, C., Kleijnen, J., & Van den Berk, T. (2003). Lactational amenorrhea for family planning. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD001329.Find this resource:

Van der Wijden, C., & Manion, C. (2015). Lactational amenorrhoea method for family planning. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10, CD001329.Find this resource:

Victora, C. G., Bahl, R., Barros, A. J., Franca, G. V., Horton, S., Krasevec, J., & Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. (2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet, 387(10017), 475–490.Find this resource:

Wagner, C. L., Greer, F. R., Sect, B., & Comm, N. (2008). Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics, 122(5), 1142–1152.Find this resource:

Wells, J. C. K. (2018). Breast-feeding as “personalized nutrition.” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72(9), 1234–1238.Find this resource:

White, B. K., Burns, S. K., Giglia, R. C., & Scott, J. A. (2016). Designing evaluation plans for health promotion mHealth interventions: A case study of the Milk Man mobile app. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 27(3), 198–203.Find this resource:

White, B. K., Giglia, R. C., Scott, J. A., & Burns, S. K. (2018). How new and expecting fathers engage with an app-based online forum: Qualitative analysis. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 6(6), e144.Find this resource:

White, B. K., Martin, A., White, J. A., Burns, S. K., Maycock, B. R., Giglia, R. C., & Scott, J. A. (2016). Theory-based design and development of a socially connected, gamified mobile app for men about breastfeeding (Milk Man). JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 4(2), 566–580.Find this resource:

Wisnieski, L., Kerver, J., Holzman, C., Todem, D., & Margerison-Zilko, C. (2018). Breastfeeding and risk of metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Human Lactation 34(3), 515–525.Find this resource:

Wong, G. L., Seto, W. K., Wong, V. W., Yuen, M. F., & Chan, H. L. (2018). Review article: Long-term safety of oral anti-viral treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 47(6), 730–737.Find this resource:

World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative. (2018). The World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative report and resources (WBTi). Delhi, India: Author.Find this resource:

World Cancer Research Fund, & American Institute for Cancer Research. (2017). Diet, nutrition, physical activity and breast cancer. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2002). The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: Report of an Expert Consultation Geneva, Switzerland 28–30 March 2001 (Vol. 38). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2008). Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: Conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6–8 November 2007 in Washington DC, USA. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2009). Acceptable medical reasons for use of breastmilk substitutes. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2016a). Guideline: Daily iron supplementation in infants and children. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2016b). Policy brief: World Health Assembly Resolution on the inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2018a). Infant and young child feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2018b). Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: National implementation of the international code, status report 2018 (Vol. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2018c). Support for mothers to initiate and establish breastfeeding after childbirth. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2018d). Tobacco fact sheet. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization. (2019). Vitamin D supplementation in infants. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Find this resource:

World Health Organization Collaborative Group. (2000). Effect of breastfeeding on infant and child mortality due to infectious diseases in less developed countries: A pooled analysis. WHO Collaborative Study Team on the Role of Breastfeeding on the Prevention of Infant Mortality. The Lancet, 355(9202), 451–455.Find this resource:

World Health Organization European Regional Office. (2019). The new European policy for health—Health 2020 policy framework (Draft).Find this resource:

Xu, F., Binns, C., Zhang, H., Yang, G., & Zhao, Y. (2010). Paternal smoking and breastfeeding in Xinjiang, PR China. Journal of Human Lactation, 26(3), 242–247.Find this resource:

Xu, F., Li, Z., Binns, C., Bonello, M., Austin, M. P., & Sullivan, E. (2014). Does infant feeding method impact on maternal mental health? Breastfeeding Medicine, 9(4), 215–221.Find this resource:

Yokomichi, H., Matsubara, H., Ishikuro, M., Kikuya, M., Isojima, T., Yokoya, S., & Kure, S. (2018). Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake on body mass index, weight, and height of infants and toddlers: An infant survey. Journal of Epidemiology, 28(5), 237–244.Find this resource:

Young, J., & Shipstone, R. (2018). Shared sleeping surfaces and dangerous sleeping environments. In J. R. Duncan & R. W. Byard (Eds.), SIDS: Sudden infant and early childhood death: The past, the present and the future. Adelaide, Australia: Adelaide University Press.Find this resource:

Yusuff, A. S., Tang, L., Binns, C. W., & Lee, A. H. (2015). Prevalence and risk factors for postnatal depression in Sabah, Malaysia: A cohort study. Women and Birth, 28(1), 25–29.Find this resource:

Yusuff, A. S., Tang, L., Binns, C. W., & Lee, A. H. (2016). Breastfeeding and postnatal depression: A prospective cohort study in Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Human Lactation, 32(2), 277–281.Find this resource:

Zanardo, V., Svegliado, G., Cavallin, F., Giustardi, A., Cosmi, E., Litta, P., & Trevisanuto, D. (2010). Elective cesarean delivery: Does it have a negative effect on breastfeeding? Birth, 37(4), 275–279.Find this resource:

Zarshenas, M., Zhao, Y., Binns, C. W., & Scott, J. A. (2018). Baby-friendly hospital practices are associated with duration of full breastfeeding in primiparous but not multiparous Iranian women. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 14(3).Find this resource:

Zhang, M., Xie, X., Lee, A. H., & Binns, C. W. (2004). Prolonged lactation reduces ovarian cancer risk in Chinese women. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13(6), 499–502.Find this resource:

Zhao, J., Zhao, Y., Du, M., Binns, C. W., & Lee, A. H. (2017a). Does caesarean section affect breastfeeding practices in China? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(11), 2008–2024.Find this resource:

Zhao, J., Zhao, Y., Du, M., Binns, C. W., & Lee, A. H. (2017b). Maternal education and breastfeeding practices in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery, 50, 62–71.Find this resource:

Zhu, Z., & Hu, Y. (2009). Policewoman rises to hero status for breastfeeding. China Daily.Find this resource: