Show Summary Details

Page of

Printed from Encyclopedia of Social Work. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 25 March 2023



  • Selena T. RodgersSelena T. RodgersCity University of New York, York College


Racism is pervasive, endemic, and historically rooted in systematic assumptions inherent in superiority based on race and requires the critical attention of all social workers. The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) has made strides in tackling racism as demonstrated by the social worker and civil rights activist Whitney Young Jr. (1921–1971), other pioneers, and more recently, the NASW zero-tolerance racism policy. Undergirded in empirical discussion, this article leads with the etymology of race(ism), followed by a discussion of Racial Formation Theory and Critical Race Theory. The article gives a historical sketch of racism, followed by examples of its contemporary indicators—throughout social institutions—in the United States. Racism is pervasive and impinges on micro-level and macro-level systems. It is, therefore, beyond the scope of this article to address how racism impacts each group in America. Social work scholars and other experts have provided extensive empirical documentation about the historical trauma and sufferings of other racial groups (e.g., Native Americans/Native peoples/American Indians, Mexican Americans) discussed elsewhere. Specifically, the racism endured by blacks in America is the emphasis of this article. Themes of “colorism” and historical trauma are provided to contextualize advances in national reform and encourage a broader conversation about the racism that blacks experience globally. In addition, this article highlights strides by the social work profession to eradicate racism. Implications for social work are discussed.


  • Ethics and Values
  • Human Behavior
  • Race, Ethnicity, and Culture
  • Social Justice and Human Rights
  • Social Work Profession

Etymology and Social Construction of Race(ism)

Race has varied along with contradictory definitions of the term (Coleman, 2011). The notion of racism requires deliberate scrutiny due to its contested and multiple meanings (Ladson-Billings, 2000a). There are also varying perspectives as to when the term racism entered the lexicon. The Oxford English Dictionary (2013) traces the English term to 1936 (from the French racisme) in the context of Nazi theories. DuBois and Miley (2014) conceptualize racism as “the prejudicial attitudes directed against groups that society identifies as ‘lesser’—less capable, less productive, and less normal” (p. 137).

Earlier and contradictory accounts of race and racism are well documented (Coleman, 2011). The American physician and natural scientist Samuel G. Morton (1799–1851), writing in his seminal works Crania Aegyptica (1841) and Crania Americana (1839), argued for the biological basis of various racial groups, suggesting a hierarchical ranking with whites at the top and blacks at the bottom (Franklin & Higginbotham, 2011, p. 164). In his writings, Morton claimed that the Caucasians had the biggest brains, Indians, Native Americans/Native peoples/American Indians were in the middle with average brains, and “Negroes” (blacks) had the smallest brains (Franklin & Higginbotham, 2011). The polygenesis theory was the cultural concept that accompanied craniology. Polygenesis, or the idea of multiple Gardens of Eden and Adams and Eves, allowed for separate human development in various parts of the world. This cultural component made it easier for many white Christians to accept the “scientific” argument which asserted that blacks had a smaller brain size thus proving lower intelligence in blacks and their physiological distinction from whites (Franklin & Higginbotham, 2011). Races emerged from different human origins, and thus represented different human species. Franklin and Higginbotham note that “Antebellum ethnological studies touted the inherent inferiority of Blacks to justify their permanent enslavement . . . in the case of free blacks, their permanent and civic subordination” (p. 164).

As summarized by DeGruy (2005) and Haller (1971), earlier arguments described by the biologist Carl Von Linnaeus (1707–1778) in his book Systema Naturae (1735) put in motion his beliefs about race and racism, and in particular the use of skin color as a criterion for determining the moral and intellectual capacities of each race. Linnaeus is also credited with introducing the taxonomic system (DeGruy, 2005; Haller, 1971). Another proponent of racial categorizing was Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1751–1840), who relied heavily on the approach of “comparative anatomy” to divide the human species into five races. He used the term Caucasian, which he invented (DeGruy, 2005; Haller, 1971). To offer a more recent example, the anthropologist Carelton Coon (1968) traced the origins of “race” to the classifications Caucasoid, Mongoliod, Negroid, and Australoid. Such stratified classifications and the rationalizations for them justified fewer resources, fewer opportunities, and fewer possibilities for those with lower status (DuBois & Miley, 2014).

Cheikh Anta Diop (1923–1986), a Senegalese physicist, historian, and anthropologist, examined the origins of the human race and precolonial African culture. Diop’s work (1974, 1978, 1989, 1991), summarized by Karenga, “found physical evidence of physical anthropology (for example, iconography, melanin dosage tests, osteological measurements, and blood group tests) confirming genetic linkages of the Nile Valley with Africanness or Blackness” (p. 52). Diop’s research findings were validated “with the 1974 discovery in Ethiopia of the fossil remains of ‘Lucy’ one of the earliest hominids; scientists now acknowledge that Africa is the continent from which human kind arose more than 3 million years ago” (Franklin & Higginbotham, 2011, p. 2).

W. E. B. Du Bois (1999) and like-minded sociologists and historians (Fredrickson, 2005; Hochschild & Powell, 2008; Smedley & Smedley, 2005; White, 2005) assert that “race” is not a biological construct that reflects innate differences, but a social construct that precisely captures categories and classifications served to justify colonialism, white supremacy, slavery, exploitation, and official forms of discrimination. From this perspective, race as defined by King (1981) is “a concept of society that insists there is a genetic significance behind human variations in skin color that transcends outward appearance. However, race has no scientific merit outside of sociological classifications. There are no significant genetic variations within the human species to justify the division of ‘race’” (p. 118).

Furthermore, many accounts reveal that racial ideologies are reinforced, in part, because of social power and control structures—requisite components of racism (Jackson & Weidman, 2004). The sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois (1999) and the historian George White Jr. (2005) insist that negative racial attitudes sanctioned by governmental administrators perpetuated racism in American foreign policy. It is this race-constructed reality (which emphasized racial stratification) that led to a rigid racial hierarchy resulting in the subordination of racial, ethnic, or cultural groups within the social fabric of society, allowing access to or denial of the privileges of power and wealth (Jackson & Weidman, 2004; Smedley & Smedley, 2005).

Consequently, these constructs manifest themselves in census data as residuals of historical discrimination, which serve to underpin affirmative action policies and reinforce inherited, immutable social and cultural differences between groups (Schor, 2005; Hirschman, 2004; Perez & Hirschman, 2009). The notion of classifying and counting individuals by race evolved during the American Revolutionary and Antebellum periods (Anderson, 1988, 2002; Snipp, 2003).

To better understand how the legacy of racism reverberates in the 21st century, nuanced attention to the origins of the American censuses’ race and color categorization is necessary (Alexander, 2010; Nobles, 2000). Beginning in 1790, data were collected using the first U.S. decennial census. Racial categories were used to distinguish whites from other race (or color) categories, which excluded Native Americans/Native peoples (American “Indians”), dehumanized blacks (slaves counted as three-fifths of free persons, free colored persons), divided the black race (mulattoes vs. Negros), and reinforced invisibility of the “Mexican” race (Du Bois, 1999; Nobles, 2000; Schor, 2005). This hierarchical structure—deeply rooted in colonialism and racism—has lasting effects of historical trauma for the abovementioned racial groups (Brave Heart, 2003, 2007; Estrada, 2009; Evans-Campbell, 2008; Rodgers, 2013). It is beyond the scope of this article to address racism imposed on each group in America. Social work scholars and others have provided extensive expert and empirical documentation about the historical trauma and sufferings of other racial groups and this subject is discussed elsewhere (Brave-Heart, 2003, 2007; Estrada, 2009).

Specifically, the affliction endured by blacks in America is the emphasis of this discussion. This article is particularly relevant as past discussions have mostly been enmeshed in experiences with other racial groups. Themes of “colorism” and historical trauma are provided to help advance a broader conversation about the racism blacks experience globally.

Theorizing Racism

Several theories have been widely documented to explain racism. This article highlights two key theories—Racial Formation Theory and Critical Race Theory—to help explain racism in America and to adequately capture the complexity and intersectionality of racism as both historical and modern-day phenomenon. Persistently downplaying the legacy of racism leaves social workers unprepared to deal with their clients’ systematic and interpersonal experiences (Schiele, 2007). DeGruy (2005) insists that unlike other atrocities, American slavery experiences were exclusively based on the notion of racial inferiority. Subhuman classifications were upheld by enacted legislation—the Three-Fifths Compromise. Horton and Horton (2005) provide the background: “Delegates from the southern and northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention . . . also furnished slaveholders with additional representation in Congress by allowing them to count three-fifths of their human property in the population numbers that determined the representative of the state districts in the U.S. House of Representatives” (pp. 67–68).

Racial Formation Theory

Racial Formation Theory (RFT) is a useful framework to understand the racism construct. Michael Omi and Howard Winant (1994) are credited as the founders of Racial Formation Theory, which explores the meaning of race and racism. Within this theory, questions about power and discrimination directed at individuals, collective consciousness, and perceptions about “race” are explored as an intersection between historical, geopolitical, and sociocultural patterns (Omi & Winant, 1994).

According to this theory, phenotypes that are biologically based form an illusionary foundation for social groups who select these traits for racial identification; as such, racial identification is always socially and historically constructed (Omi & Winant, 1994). Past formulations of historically racist societies have traditionally “referenced overtly racist regimes” such as the slave societies in the Americas and Caribbean, Jim Crow era in the American South, Nazi Germany, and apartheid era in South Africa (Fredrickson, 2002). In each of these societies, racial inequality was a formally codified system wherein specific racial groups labeled other racial groups as inferior and systematically denied those groups fundamental social rights. The key element of these societies was their ethnocentric beliefs as reflected in their overt and systematic oppression of a specific racial group or groups (Ani, 1994).

Critical Race Theory

Undergirded by the analytical framework of Critical Race Theory (CRT), racism is seen as having been constructed by the legal system as aberrant, intentional behavior, perpetrated by willful wrongdoers as a means of distributing jobs, power, esteem, prestige, and wealth (Crenshaw, Gotanda, Peller, & Thomas, 1995, p. xiv). CRT scholars conceived the idea that racism is rooted in dominant discourses as manifested by educational, social, and political policies that are directed toward marginalized groups (Closson, 2010; Crenshaw et al., 1995; Delgado & Stefancic, 2001; Ladson-Billings, 2000b; Solórzano & Yosso, 2001). From this lens, CRT theorists have asserted several principle tenets anchored in themes of racial formation, intersectionality, gender (in)equality, institutionalized oppressive structures, political activities, and whiteness-as-property (Crenshaw et al., 1995).

Blacks have been duplicitously controlled through “the new Jim Crow” (Alexander, 2010) as manifested in laws, policy, and formal and informal practices throughout education, employment, health, housing, voting (Davis & Jung, 2013; Omi & Winant, 1994; Pollard, 2013; Staples, 2011). Historically, blacks were denied the right to vote based on practices that included literacy tests, poll taxes, and white-only primaries (Horton & Horton, 2005; Pollard, 2013). Contemporary examples of oppressive structures are seen through disenfranchisement laws prohibiting persons convicted of felonies to vote, housing discrimination, and the inability to secure employment after release from prison (Alexander, 2010). Historically, African Americans have had unemployment rates that are twice the rates of Euro-Americans (Davis & Jung, 2013; U.S. Census Bureau, 2007). Furthermore, African Americans and Latino populations are reported to have the lowest per capital income (Davis & Jung, 2013; Sakamoto, Anastas, McPhail, & Colarossi, 2008; U.S. Census, 2012). With regard to the intersection of gender and race (in)equality, gendered racism is among a myriad of issues accounting for the low salaries reported by black women (hooks, 1981). The concept of “whiteness-as-property,” for example, which has been posited by Critical Race Theorists (e.g., Crenshaw et al., 1995), argues that racism is endemic in U.S. society and deeply embedded legally, culturally, and psychologically. Accordingly, oftentimes a person classified as white has access to social, economic, and political networks that are closed to those outside of this classification. In addition to being a key that unlocks metaphorical doors in society, whiteness provides a psychological benefit to those so classified: resources, power, and the knowledge that she/he will be respected as a human being and will enjoy all of the privileges of living in this society. Thus, white privilege makes preferences and behaviors of the dominant group an intrinsic part of the social fabric and sets the boundaries to be observed for acceptance and nonacceptance of “others” (Franklin, Boyd-Franklin, & Kelly, 2006; Jones, 1997). The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dred Scott case (1857), that neither free nor enslaved Africans were citizens and therefore had no rights, presented a sharp contrast between the treatment of blacks and whites (Horton & Horton, 2005). The practical, tangible, and material advantages experienced by those classified as white become evident. The different outcomes are reflected in mortality rates, social mobility, wealth creation, as well as other areas (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011b; Du Bois, 1996).

From the perspective of CRT, in order for whites to enact civil rights legislation, the majority needed to perceive of themselves in terms other than racist. Racism was construed by the legal system as aberrant, intentional behavior, consciously perpetrated by wrongdoers as a means of distributing jobs, power, prestige, and wealth among those classified as white (Crenshaw et al., 1995, p. xiv). The legalistic focus on “intentional behavior” is especially important as it enables racism to survive because those individuals and institutions that perpetuate disparities based on race are able to claim that their actions were not “intentional.” Ironically, by invoking a supposed “color-blindness” (Bonilla-Silva, 2013), contemporary racists are able to reinvigorate practices from bygone eras, reinforcing the benefits and burdens of mainstream racial classifications and legitimizing fears of crime, fraud, or injustice, hence reinforce an age of neo-slavery (Appliah & Gates, 2003; Blackmon, 2008; Owen, 2007).

A Brief Sketch: Old-Fashioned and Contemporary Racism

Trajectories of racism have been summarized within two ideologies—old-fashioned (historical) and modern (contemporary) racism. They are embedded in manifestations of racial subordination that serve to discriminate, marginalize, and disadvantage people of color in the United States and elsewhere (Bonilla-Silva, 2013; Clark et al., 2006; Doane, 2003; Hoyt, 2012; Ladson-Billings, 2000b; National Association of Social Workers, 2007; Tarman & Sears, 2005; Watt, 2007). Since the political and social gains of the civil rights era (Pollard, 2013), explicit forms of racism have evolved from the “old-fashioned” form into a new model in which overt racial hatred and bigotry (e.g., legalized segregation, disenfranchisement, lynching) tend to be less consciously and publicly displayed expressions of racial oppression (Blackmon, 2008; Picca & Feagin, 2007; Winant, 2000).

Jones (1997) categorizes racism into three domains: Individual racism includes the attitudes and acts that express a person’s prejudices. Cultural racism is the result of the privileged groups’ power to determine values, beliefs, attitudes, and practices so that they become legitimate expressions of its culture. Institutional racism is the process whereby individual racists’ beliefs are nurtured by convictions of power and authority and converted into discriminatory policies and procedures of the institution. While each domain is relevant to understanding the full scope and effects of racism, this article emphasizes institutional racism in America with reference to cultural racism in the discussion that follows on colorism.

A number of authors have argued that the legacy of past overt racist ideologies persist today in the racist catalogue of pejoratives with the vehemence of convention, which is now covert and concealed in institutionalized policies in the very fabric of American society (Ladson-Billings, 2000a; Picca & Feagin, 2007). Specifically, institutional racism refers to practices and policies that disadvantage racial groups in public and private social institutions (such as education, government, financial, etc.) and result in unequal outcomes for disparate racial groups (Bonilla-Silva, 2003; Carmichael & Hamilton, 1967; Feagin, 2014; Picca & Feagin, 2007; Yamato, 2004). However, contemporary forms of racist expression are immutable and “ever-present” (DeGruy, 2005; Fanon,1967; Pollard, 2013) in many social institutions, policies, and in coded language. As asserted by National Association of Social Workers (2007), in the volume Institutional Racism & the Social Work Profession: A Call to Action, there is persistent challenge for social workers dedicated to eradicating both overt and subtle forms of racism. Specific examples of three types of subtle racism include: (a) racial micro-aggressions (e.g., Sue et al., 2007; Van Sluytman, 2013), (b) backstage behavior (Picca & Feagin, 2007), and (c) color-blind racism (Bonilla-Silva, 2003).

Racial Micro-Aggressions

Racial microaggressions (microassaults, microinsults, microinvalidations) are another form of contemporary racism. Chester M. Pierce (1970) first coined the term racial microaggression to describe subtle communications of expectations and stereotypes related to race, which was later referred to by others (e.g., Solórzano, Ceja, & Yosso, 2000; Sue et al., 2007; Van Sluytman, 2013) to describe “subtle” exchanges or “put downs” endured by people of color. Sue et al. (2007) asserted that microaggressions are used to justify, ignore, and silence those with less power through various methods: microassaults (overtly racist and demeaning interactions, such as using a racial slur); micorinvalidations (exclude, negate, and nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of people of color), and microinsults (demeaning a person’s racial heritage and identity, “subtle snubs” in which contributions of people of color are unacknowledged, invisible, or marginalized).

Backstage Behavior

“Backstage” behaviors, as conceptualized by Picca and Feagin (2007), refer to the use of outward or “public professions of belief” in racial equality or racial justice that mask a private belief in the biological and cultural inferiority of African Americans, the telling of racist jokes, frequent use of racial epithets and pejoratives, and the stereotyping and mocking of racial and cultural groups in comfortable, hidden situations.

Color-Blind Racism

Bonilla-Silva (2013) asserts that color-blindness is the failure of non-whites to acknowledge the oppressive history, discrimination, and violence committed by whites against non-whites through contemporary inequality. Like “backstage behavior,” color-blind racism relies upon deception. Color-blind racist acts or policies appear to be race-neutral but, in fact, revive old-fashioned racism and/or cause disparate harm to people of color. Bonilla-Silva (2003) also notes that while color-blind racist practices are more discrete than past Jim Crow–era policies, these “new” racist practices still serve to uphold the dominant racial order of white supremacy. Such discriminatory practices are embedded as norms in society’s social structures that breed institutional racism (National Association of Social Workers, 2007), and continue subtly in many social institutions as a more ambiguous and nebulous form that is more difficult to identify, but is ever-present (Bonilla-Silva, 2013; Feagin, 2014).

Intersectionality of Racism: Slavery, Biomedical Experimentation, Racial Disparities, and Disproportionality

In America, racism has resulted in the construction of social institutions and policies that restrict resources and determine disparities in racial and ethnic groups (Alexander, 2010; Davis & Jung; 2013; Omi & Winant, 1994). Many scholars attribute these persistent disparities to institutional racism. Black political activists Stokely Carmichael (Kwame Touré) and Charles V. Hamilton (1967) originally coined the term “institutional racism” in their analysis of the economic, political, and social conditions facing black communities in the United States. Institutional racism is dependent on anti-black beliefs and on a presumption of black inferiority. Also called structural racism, the term was later expanded and defined as system of institutional structures that lead to disparities observed by marginalized persons that are inherent in institutional processes and policies (Griffin, Pifer, Humphrey, & Hazelwood, 2011). The two terms are frequently used interchangeably and primarily emphasize racial inequities not produced by individual conduct that often are perceived as less overt, less observable but with enduring systematic impacts on human life (Cashmore & Jennings, 2001).

DeGruy (2005) and Wilkerson (2010) concede that African Americans broadly have experienced and continue to endure the residual pains and injustices born of chattel slavery. Evidence suggests that African Americans are—both historically and in the era of “the new Jim Crow”—disproportionately oppressed and endure a higher incidence of disparity in America than other populations (Alexander, 2010; Watkins, 2009). In the 21st century, racism remains pervasive and yields dire consequences. (Alexander, 2010; Davis & Jung, 2013; Rule & Rule, 2010). There is an extensive body of postracial literature on child welfare, education, housing, media and entertainment, unemployment, voting rights disparities, and inequalities among blacks and other racial and ethnic groups; such subjects have been widely documented throughout social work literature (Davis & Jung, 2013; Fong, McRoy, & Dettlaff, 2014; Lum, 2009; Pollard, 2013). The present and forthcoming sections highlight some of the myriad examples in which racism is institutionalized. Specifically, it extends previous discussion by using historical and contemporary examples, which resonate with blacks and intersects social work on the micro-, mezzo-, and macro-level systems (DuBois & Miley, 2014).

Racism, Racial Health Disparities, and Disproportionality

Experimentation on the effects of racism continues to be a widely employed design in research and medical care. Several authoritative entities have documented that significant racial and ethnical health disparities and inequalities persist in major dimensions of medical care (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a; Institute of Medicine, 2002; United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2010). Davis and Jung (2013) contend that no single racial or ethnic group in the United States is excluded from health disparities. These health inequalities within the United States have a long, well-documented history, one in which racism has been used to foster racist institutions and a legacy of mistrust in the African American community (Bent-Goodley, 2007; Gamble, 1993).

Racism appears throughout the history of U.S. medical research. Vertus Wellborn Hardiman (1922–2007) was a victim of a U.S. government human radiation experiment at age five, an exposure which left him with a painful skull deformity that forced him to cover his head for 80 years (Smith, 2011). The infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (also known as “Bad Blood”) was a clinical study conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service for 40 years (1932–1972) in which six hundred black men from Tuskegee, Alabama, were used as guinea pigs in a study of untreated syphilis (Brandt, 2000; Gamble, 1993; Gamble, 1997; Heller, 1972). In 1951, Henrietta Lacks (1920–1951) had her DNA (HeLa) immortal cells clandestinely removed, cultivated, and tested without her permission at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and they have been used for biomedical research from 1951 to the present day (Skloot, 2010). Black women were exploited “subjects” in medical research experimentation, including instances of the repeated cutting and sewing of women’s vaginas in the interest of advancing medical practice for white women (DeGury, 2005; Washington, 2006). These stark atrocities, perpetrated by the U.S. government and biomedical communities, contributed to treatment barriers for African Americans with various health and mental health service needs (Rodgers, 2006; Valandra, 2007).

Absent racism, investigators would expect to find roughly comparable data or results across the various groups who make up the whole of America. However, social scientists repeatedly note extreme differences in results for blacks and whites that cannot be explained by any other factor (or combination of factors). As a result, disproportionality is an appropriate way to demonstrate and/or quantify the harms caused by racism; this is especially true in the era of color-blind racism, where there is little evidence of overt racial animus or intention. Consistent with past injurious medical research are contemporary and notable examples of these widespread incidences of health disparities in African Americans. Although the 2010 Census shows that blacks make up approximately 14% of the U.S. total population (United States Census, 2011), they are inordinately affected by a range of health disparities. In 2010, for example, blacks accounted for 69% of all reported cases of gonorrhea (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a). The AIDS endemic is yet another example of the instance of health care disparities. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011a), the diagnosis rate for HIV cases in the United States was 15.8 per 100,000 population and 60.4 among blacks. In 2010, homicide is the leading cause of death for African Americans between 10 and 24 years old, reaching exorbitant rates (51.5 per 100,000) and exceeding other racial groups in the same age category.

Overrepresented in the health outcomes and disparities in African Americans are inextricably linked to former slave status and firmly entrenched in colonialism as well as oppression, and in contemporary, historical, and intergenerational racism-related stress and trauma (Akbar, 1996; Barden, 2013; Davis & Jung, 2013; DeGruy, 2006; Griffith, Johnson, Ellis, & Schulz, 2010; Rodgers, 2013; Valandra, 2007). Therefore, when looking at the disproportionality of blacks in the United States, in particular, it is evident that the medical diagnosis and treatment provided is not equivalent to that of the dominant group. This assertion perhaps is best understood through the lens of colonialism. Taken together, disproportionality and colonialism breeds racism in medical and health treatment of black women, men, and children.

The burdens of asthma fall more heavily on black children (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2014). According to the CDC summary health statistics for U.S. children, in a national health interview survey completed in 2012, black children were more likely to have been diagnosed with asthma (22%) than other racial groups and were more likely to have had two or more visits to the emergency room in the past 12 months than other racial groups (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011). Other health disparities in African American children include proportionally larger prescribing of Methylphendiate (Ritalin), a drug commonly used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—see American Psychiatric Association (APA, 2013) for diagnosis details. According to a report by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) released in 2009, researchers have shown that Ritalin can cause physical changes in neurons in reward regions of mouse brains—in some cases, these effects mirrored those of cocaine. While NIDA (2008) asserts that Ritalin does not lead to drug addiction or other health consequences in adulthood, the fact remains that black children who attend public schools are prescribed Ritalin at disproportionately higher rates (Carlezon, Mague, & Andersen, 2003) and are still exorbitantly represented with various health risks when compared to other racial groups. African American children and other children of color who are diagnosed with ADHD are placed on Ritalin in large numbers (Boyd-Franklin, 2003; Boyd-Franklin, Franklin, & Toussaint, 2001). Research suggests that the misdiagnosis of ADHD combined with prescription drug use in children may lead to a higher risk of those children developing depressive symptoms in adulthood.

In 2009, the mortality rate for all cancers combined continued to be 31% higher in African American men and 15% higher in African American women than in white men and women, respectively (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, 2012). Yet in 2011, black women were more likely to die of breast cancer than any other group (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a). Research found that black women who reported they had been racially discriminated against were more likely (31%) to develop breast cancer than those who did not report experiences of racial discrimination (Taylor et al., 2007).

In 2010, approximately 4 out of every 10 black women (43.7%) had been a victim of rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime. In cases of sexual assault survivors, research suggests that African American women are more likely to have been assaulted with weapons and to arrive at emergency rooms for health services than other racial groups (Boykins, Alvanzo, Carson, Forte, Leisey, & Plichta, 2010). Additionally, other studies documented that black women have suffered sexual abuse at a greater rate than other women, with estimates ranging from 8 to 19% of all black women (Wise, Palmer, Rothman, & Rosenberg, 2009). There are extensive examples and empirical studies documenting psychological and other mental health outcomes. However, shortcomings of traditional approaches in existing models for responding to intimate partner violence among African American women are predicated on oppressive institutional structures and function from a culturally neutral perspective, in which violence is perceived to be the same across all race and cultural groups (Bent-Goodley, Chase, Rodgers, & Circo, 2010).

As asserted by Bent-Goodley et al. (2010), Rodgers (2006, 2011), and Williams (2008), it is critical to place intimate partner violence and other aforementioned prevalence rates into a sociocultural context rooted in African values and traditions, and other culturally competent strength-based models in which historical trauma are given nuanced attention. These approaches will help cement the sustainability of President Barack Obama’s progressive priorities, which include an initiative called Healthy People 2020, a 10-year national plan with objectives to improve health of all Americans.

Post-Slavery Era in United States: Policies, Social Controls, Social Institutions

There are additional reasons for focusing on the black experience with institutionalization. From chattel slavery to present-day policies and laws, principles of racial superiority bestow power and unearned privilege on those who conceptualize, enforce, and maintain institutionalized mechanisms and manifestations of racism in America (Alexander, 2010; Franklin, Boyd-Franklin, & Kelly, 2006). The Trans-Atlantic slave trade, which occurred between 1619 and mid-1800’s and is defined by the torturous journey that enslaved African people from civilizations and empires and brought them from Africa to the Americas (Horton & Horton, 2005). The anthropologist Marimba Ani, in her riveting book Let the Circle Be Unbroken (1994), coined the term “Maafa” (the Kiswahili word for disaster, terrible occurrence, or great tragedy) to encapsulate the black (African) Holocaust experience.

As affirmed by Asante and Asante (1985) in African Culture: The Rhythms of Unity, from the perspective of the African worldview, tampering with one part of “oneness” affected the whole. Continuing with the work of Du Bois, social work scholars Martin and Martin (2002) assert the role of the so-called black “helping tradition” to preserve African American family unification. Enslavement of African people by Europeans and social institutions in America has shattered the interconnectedness of black families.


Black women viewed as property and treated as mules for slave breeding by their white male slave owners were raped for social and economic reasons. These rapes “solidified” unpunished sexual violence against black women and institutionalized the subhuman status of black females (see Bent-Goodley, St. Vil, & Rodgers, 2012a, 2012b; Gray-White, 1999; Du Bois, 1935). Examples of these insidious acts are well-documented: Celia (1836–1855), for example, was a slave who was sexually exploited by her master and then executed for his murder; McLaurin, 2012). In another example, Crais and Scully (2010) observes that the South African Saartjie “Sara” Baartman was put on display as the icon of Hottentot Venus—a paradoxical freak of race and sexuality (Crais & Scully, 2010).

DeGruy (2005) recounts that J. Marion Sims, a physician in the mid-1800s, who in addition to creating the first vaginal speculum also conducted un-anesthetized surgical experimentations on African slave women, claimed that black women were able to bear great pain because of their race. These practices accord with the experiences of the civil rights–era activist leader Fannie Lou Hamer (1917–1977) and a host of nameless others who endured forced hysterectomies—the notorious “Mississippi Appendectomy”—without their consent (Barden, 2013; Washington, 2006). The purpose of this inhumane procedure was to reduce the numbers of African Americans and to limit the reproductive rights of women; they were endorsed by laws permitting and encouraging coercive sterilization worldwide (Roberts, 1998; World Health Organization, 2014).


Black (African) children stolen from their families and sold as chattel property demonstrate another insidious act inflicted by enslavement (Jacobs, 2001). African children such as Olaudah Equiano or Gustavus Vassa (1745–1797) were kidnapped from their villages, separated from their families, and sold to slave traders (Gates, 1987). The current U.S. child welfare system can be likened to a “post” slavery institution, where black children are removed from families and overrepresented in foster care homes and facilities (Boyd-Franklin, 1989; Hill, 1977; Hodges, 2001).

Although other poor racial minority children are removed from their families in large numbers and placed in the foster care system, black children are disprortionately affected (CDC, 2013; Roberts, 2002, 2013). According to the Children’s Bureau (2012), an estimated 399, 546 of all children were placed in foster care in 2012. Of that number, data presented by the Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau (AFCARS) indicated that the number of African American and Hispanic children combined represented more than half of all the children in foster care between 1998 and 2010 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010). There is little debate: no other group is more impacted than African American children, whose families are most detrimentally affected by the child welfare system and regulatory reforms governing the system (Boyd-Franklin, 1989, U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2008; Hill, 2007). African American children represented a staggering 26% of children in foster care in 2011.

Prior to 1977, it was common practice to use child protection services to remove black children from their relatives and place them in white homes (Hill, 1977). Hodges (2001) argues that “the field of child welfare needs to build on the tradition of mutual aid and extended family by honoring and supporting kindship care as a viable alternative to foster care placement” (p. 211).

In its 1972 position statement on transracial adoptions the National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSW) vehemently opposed the placement of black children in white homes for any reason (NABSW, 1972). The impetus for this uncompromising position is rooted in their belief of the “phenomenon of trans-racial adoption as an expedient for White folk, not as an altruistic humane concern for Black children” (p. 2). Through the advocacy efforts and research documentation by the National Urban League, greater efforts have been made to place black children with their relatives (Boyd-Franklin, 1989). Contemporary social policies from legislative mandates—Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act (1980), State Plan for Foster Care and Adoption Assistance (1996), the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) of 1997 and Fostering Connection to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act (2008)—reinforce having children remain with relatives.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (2008) has studied reasons for these glaring disparities. They found the distrust of African American parents with the child welfare system, racial bias, and cultural misunderstandings among decision makers were among the key factors contributing to the deleterious effects of disproportionate removal of black children from their homes and placement into foster care (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2008). Because of the historical and ongoing rates of removal of black children from their parents, future study might explore the effects of the child welfare system. For black males, consequences of disrupted families are reflected in high school dropout rates, unemployment rates, overrepresentation in the criminal justice system (Alexander, 2010; Levitan, 2005, 2007; Pettit & Western, 2004; U.S. Census Bureau, 2011).


Racial profiling in America quite extensively affects blacks in low-income communities. The policies that lead to racial profiling include the “Rockefeller laws,” “broken windows policing,” “no knock search warrants,” “three strikes you’re out,” “truth in sentencing,” “stand your ground,” and “stop and frisk” and community policing policies strategies that reinforce mandatory minimum sentencing. Blacks also face significant disparities in sentencing rates.

Black males are incarcerated at gratuitously higher rates than other races and ethnicities (Pew Center on the States, 2009). According to the Center for American Progress (2012), approximately one in three African American males will go to prison in their lifetime; African American youth have higher rates of juvenile incarceration and are more likely to serve sentences in adult prisons. National numbers suggest that African American males were incarcerated in state and federal prisons at 6.4 times the rate of other racial and ethnic groups (Guerino, Harrison, & Sabol, 2011). In her analysis, Alexander (2010) points out that approximately 750 per 100,000 persons (mass incarceration) are black men. She asserts that this new system of social control was implemented during the civil rights era as a byproduct from lynching to mass incarceration. Notwithstanding “the old caste system crumbling and a new one would have to take its place” (Alexander, 2010, p. 22). Despite the enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (Horton & Horton, 2005), which was ratified in 1868 to guarantee the civil rights of African Americans (see Appliah & Gates, 2003), major civil rights disparities exist. In 2011 the American Civil Liberties Union reported that officers of the New York City Police Department (NYPD) stopped 685,724 New Yorkers: more than half were black (350,743 or 53%) compared to 61,805 (9%) who were white. Of the total number of people who were “stopped and frisked,” 605,328 (88%) were not found to have committed any crime. These reckless practices have helped to uphold hyperincarceration of black and Latino males (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2006; Spitzer, 1999).

Racial profiling furthers the legacy of slavery practices rooted the Jim Crow era. Actions by police state officials that would have led to charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter, assault, reckless endangerment, and criminally negligent homicide, have been ruled accidental shootings or “justifiable” and resulted in either no indictment or “not guilty” verdicts. White police officers have shot, publically chocked, and killed unarmed black males—Fred Hampton Sr. (1948–1969), Amadou Diallo (1976–1999), Sean Bell (1988–2006), Michael Brown (1996–2014), Eric Garner (1970–2014), Patrick Dorismond (1974–2000), and other named and unnamed black men.

Even when not killed, black men have been brutally beaten, dehumanized, and violated by members of law enforcement. In 1991, Rodney Glen King III (1965–2012) was assaulted with a deadly weapon by state officials who were subsequently acquitted. In 1997, Abner Louima, a Haitian immigrant, was brutalized and forcibly sodomized with a broken-off broom handle by New York City police officers. Dehumanizing practices toward black men are seen in several infamous examples: Gordon (unknown), a slave scarred from savage whippings (Gage, 2009); Jessie Washington (unknown), who was publically castrated and lynched (Du Bois, 1980); Emmett Louis Till (1941–1955), who was barbarically killed (Beauchamp, 2005). These contemporary practices, protected by the criminal justice system, mirror the physical torture of slavery that was protected by the Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court in early America (Alexander, 2010).

Wacquant (2010) conceptualizes hyperincarceration as an expansion and intensification of arrest and imprisonment. Mass incarceration (Alexander, 2010) rests upon activities by the American police, criminal courts, and prisons over the past thirty years in which incarceration has targeted African American men from the imploding ghetto, based on their class, race, and geography. Consequently, hyperincarceration is a multidimensional attack on a specific group of people and is similar to another economic and social landscape of America’s peonage system (1870s–1918), in which formerly enslaved African Americans continued to provide “free” plantation labor as sharecroppers (Cooper, 2011; DeGruy, 2005; Muhammad, 2010; Wacquant, 2010; Wilkerson, 2010). For example, DeVeaux (2013) asserts that during the 25 years he was incarcerated, he earned between $0.42 per hour and up to $7.75 per week. His reflective narrative is strikingly similar to the assertions of several scholars (Blackmon, 2008; Muhammad, 2010; Wacquant, 2010; Watkins, 2009; Wilkerson, 2010) who posit that America’s industrialization was built on repressions of the plantation and on the backs of the “free” labor of chattel slavery which maintains its advantages in perpetuity. Although The Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude except as punishment for a crime. Muhammad, 2010, the debt peonage system permitted somewhat of a de facto slavery in which African American families worked the land of their former slave owners in exchange for housing and food (DeGruy, 2005; Wilkerson, 2010). DeVeaux (2013) also posits that psychological sufferings—for him—were compounded by witnessing constant threats of violence because of the number of suicides, and other acts of violence.

The cumulative, persistent, and multidimensional experiences of physical and psychological enslavement and imprisonment can cause psychological and historical trauma (Blackmon, 2008; DeVeaux, 2013; Martensen, 2012; Smith, 2011; Williams, 2008; Williams-Washington, 2010). Hyperincarceration is a pressing contemporary social problem requiring rigorous scientific examination, specifically as it relates to its lasting effects.

Historical Trauma and Mental Health

As asserted by Frantz Fanon (1925–1961) “the habit of considering racism as a mental quirk, as a psychological flaw, must be abandoned” (1967, p. 77). Racism in the context of historical trauma and mental health is researched and understood (Williams & Williams-Morris, 2000) in cultural trauma (Barden, 2013; Eyerman, 2001), invisibility syndrome (Franklin et. al., 2006; Franklin & Boyd-Franklin, 2000), race-based trauma (Carter & Forsyth, 2009), post-slavery traumatic stress syndrome (Akbar, 1996), post-traumatic slavery syndrome (Pouissaint & Alexander, 2000), and post-traumatic slave syndrome (Crawford, Nobles, Leary, 2003; DeGruy, 2005).

In the case of African Americans, social worker Joy DeGruy (2005), in her pioneering book Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome: America’s Legacy of Enduring Injury and Healing, has described post-traumatic slave syndrome “as a condition that exists when a population has experienced multigenerational trauma resulting from centuries of slavery and continues to experience oppression and institutionalized racism today” (p. 125).

The accounts briefly described thus far chronicle various intersections of a legacy of racism institutionalized in America (Du Bois, 1999; DeGruy, 2005). While many abhorrent things happen to blacks because of the racist practices perpetrated against them, it is also critical to acknowledge their strengths embedded in a proud genetic inheritance of greatness, “oneness,” survival, and spirituality (Ani, 1994; Diop, 1974, 1978, 1989, 1991; Martin & Martin, 2002, Robinson, Battle, & Robinson, 1987; Williams, 1987).

Social Work: Perceptions, Responses, and Commitment to Eradicate Racism in the United States

This section highlights the ways social work as a profession has responded to far-reaching effects of racism. In firm support against racism, social work trailblazers like pioneer and activist Whitney M. Young Jr. (1921–1971) and NABSW first National President Cenie “Jomo” Williams Jr. (1939–1983) spearheaded early attempts to eradicate racism. Building on Whitney’s classical work, Beyond Racism: Building an Open Society, recent NASW literature informs us that racism is an ideology or practice of white supremacy of one group over others by reason of race, color, ethnicity, or cultural heritage (Clark, Weismiller, Whitaker, Waller, Zlontnik, & Corbett, 2006; National Association of Social Workers, 2007).

Social work’s model of anti-racism intervention acknowledges the embedded systemic and multidimensional nature of racism (National Association of Social Workers, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009). Despite these strides and political and social gains of the Civil Rights era (for discussion of this development, see the entry “Civil Rights,” Pollard, 2013 in this encyclopedia), overt and explicit forms of racism (for example, segregation or lynching) appear to have attenuated over the years. Examples of notable milestones of the social work profession’s commitment to eradicate racism include the establishment of National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSW) during the 1960s to address issues of racism and poverty in America. In addition, NASW established several committees, policies, and innovative strategies to eradicate racism, including: The Social Work Profession: A Call To Action to address institutional racism.

At the macro level, the profession has demonstrated its commitment to combat racism through advocacy efforts and policy reform. For example, Social Work Congress passed Social Work Imperative #6 to address the impact of racism, other forms of oppression, social injustice, and other human rights violations through social work education and practice. In the National Association of Social Workers 2012 Document to the Obama Administration the profession recommended ending the practice of racial profiling through the promotion of initiatives that fairly target the perpetrators of crimes, rather than those who represent a particular racial or ethnic minority, and urged passage of the End Racial Profiling Act.

Additionally, NASW testified at the 110 Congress to include the End Racial Profiling Act (H.R.4611/S.2481) seeking corrective action against “profiling” by federal, state, and local law enforcement officials who routinely use race, ethnicity, or national origin when choosing which individuals should be stopped, detained, or searched.

However, the implementation of the aforementioned practices are merely lip services if the actions of individuals within the social work profession ignore racism, dismiss valid claims by issuing statements as state chapters within the organization rather than as a united national and international profession.

[E]Race[ing] Colorism Globally

Racism has taken place throughout various parts of the world. Therefore, this portion of the entry highlights those examples through the theme of colorism. Racial classification based on color is a significant factor in the globalization of racism. True to prediction and into the 21st century, the world is plagued with unrest relative to color in the United States and around the world. W. E. B. Du Bois (1999) in his classic 1903 work, The Souls of Black Folk, envisaged that “the problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color line (racism)—the relation of the darker to the lighter races of men in Asia and Africa, in America and the islands of the sea.” It is clear that issues of “Color in a White Society” (National Association of Social Workers, 2007, p. 25) continue into this day. As stated previously, race is a social construct that precisely captures categories and classifications served to justify colonialism, slavery, exploitation, and official forms of discrimination (Fredrickson, 2005; Hochschild & Powell, 2008; Smedley & Smedley, 2005; Du Bois, 1999; White, 2005). However colorism is a construct rooted in characteristics of skin tone (Hochschild & Powell, 2008; Robinson, 2013). According to Culbreth (2006), types of colorism include “interracial colorism” and “intraracial colorism.” Whereas, interracial colorism involves a member of one racial group making a distinction based on the skin color of members belonging to a different racial group, in contrast, intraracial colorism involves a member of one group making distinctions based on the skin color of members belonging to the same racial group.

As asserted by Robinson (2013), “One lesson taught by slavery and colonialism was a social discrimination and hierarchical structure between members of the same race, based on skin color, a phenomenon known as colorism” (p. 580). Partisan practices date back to the American chattel system of slavery where slave owners used skin color as the basis to divide work chores and blacks. Moreover, the “blackest” slaves were perceived as the healthiest and better laborers and the lighter-skinned blacks were better suited for intelligent tasks, such as craftsmanship or lighter labor (Kerr, 2005). Dark-skinned slaves worked in the field and performed more physically demanding tasks and lighter skinned slaves (resulting from mothers raped by slave masters) were given more prestigious jobs (Hunter, 2002; Johnson, 2001).

Kerr (2005) contends that derogatory attention to African features was revealed by objectionable, taboo “complexion tests,” which included “the brown paper bag principle,” and in songs, rituals, rhymes. A quote embedded in Jim Crow Laws—“If you’re light you’re right, if you’re yellow, you’re mellow, if you’re brown stick around, but if you’re Black get back, way back”—upholds earlier research conducted by Kenneth and Mamie Clark (1947) in which majority of the black children who participated in the “doll test” preferred the white dolls and rejected the ones which looked like them. These lasting effects of racism are also reinforced by media portrayals which spotlight negative images (Watkins, 2009). Additional examples include Toni Morrison’s (1970) virtuosic first novel, Bluest Eye, as well as Bill Duke and D. Channsin Berry’s (2011) documentary Dark Girls and Kiri Davis’s (2005) film, A Girl Like Me—power narratives which dig beneath the surface to explore roots of the psychological effects of colorism from America to isolated corners of the globe. Research suggests that skin color paradox has a negative impact on dark-skinned blacks.

In the United States of America, researchers found evidence of profound social stratification by skin tone. African Americans with darker skin tone reported significantly less or lower: educational attainment, employment opportunities, income status, home ownership, marital status, political representation, as well as, longer prison sentences (Culbreth, 2006; Hughes & Hertel, 1990; Ladson-Billings, 2000a; Robinson, 2013). This dark-light paradigm premised on color accords well with research that shows that since slavery, as light skin hue has been considered more attractive and appealing than dark skin (Clark & Clark, 1947; Herring, Keith, & Horton, 2004). Consequences have resulted in the blatant form of colorism—the practice of skin lightening or skin bleaching to lighten ones complexion for blacks in the United States and Afro-Jamaicans in the West Indies (WI) as a means of improving beauty and ultimately increasing opportunities for economic and social mobility (Charles, 2009; Robinson, 2013).

In Jamaica, WI, Robinson (2013) examined skin-bleaching perceptions in Afro-Jamaicans. Findings from her study suggest that British values of significant preference for light skin over dark was upheld by participants and that bleaching was a significant benefit of an exaggerated sense of beauty (Robinson, 2013). Earlier literature (Charles, 2009; Hickling & Hutchinson, 2000) confirms that the attainment of whiteness is a symbol of social acceptance. Skin bleaching poses serious concern for health officials and necessities governmental policy (Robinson, 2013).

Colorism also has immigration policy implications for persons arriving from other islands in the West Indies. For example, while past U.S.-Cuban agreement has supported the “Wet Foot, Dry Foot” policy for Cuban migration and eventually legal permanent resident status of Cubans if they made it to shore, darker-skinned immigrants, such as Haitians, who made it to land have not received the same treatment. As observed by the scholars Abu-Jamal (2004) and Danticat (2004), Haitians (unlike Cubans) are met with distorted American dreams, confined in de facto prisons, indefinite detentions or eventual deportation back to their home island.

In Brazil, slavery lasted for more than 300 years and was compounded by the divide of blacks based on color. Post-slavery, Brazilian blacks systematically occupy lower status in many venues of social, economic, and political life (Reichmann, 1995). Almost a decade later, Telles (2004) found that darker-skinned Brazilians reported lower earnings and occupational status, less access to education, and experienced various forms of discrimination when compared with lighter-skinned Brazilians. Concerning gender, Brazilian women tended to be classified in whiter categories than men (Telles, 2004).

In Africa, researchers (Ajose, 2005; Blay, 2007; Ladson-Billings, 2000a; Lewis, Robkin, Gaska, & Njoki, 2011; Ly, 2007) have also found that despite dangerous outcomes from skin bleaching chemicals (such as mercury), which may cause skin cancer, kidney disease, brain disease and increased infertility rates, skin bleaching in Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, and Ghana persists. For example, Blay (2007) reported that the light skin privileges embedded by colonialism in Ghana’s social history and culture perpetuates persistence of skin bleaching despite negative health outcomes. In the case of the Tanzanian women, a study by Lewis et al. (2011) found that skin bleaching was associated with self-objectification, colonialism, and Westernization. Regardless of the hemisphere, rac(ism) for blacks is woven throughout the fabric of every society (Jones, 1997) and it requires a collective response from social workers and like-minded disciplines interested in eradicating racism in America and globally (Ladson-Billings, 2000a; National Association of Social Workers, 2007; Wise, 2005).

Implications for Social Work

This article has trans-disciplinary—black studies, anthropology, sociology, history, social work—implications. As an exemplar, black social worker trailblazers and their colleagues in the profession have made notable milestones to eradicate racism. Still, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) asserts that racism is pervasive in U.S. society and remains a silent code that systematically closes doors to many individuals (National Association of Social Workers, 2007).

Despite social work’s concerted efforts to remedy racism institutionalized in systems through cultural competence, social diversity, policy statements and legislative action, racism continues to plague America and international societies in the 21st century. Gibson (2014) and others call for social work educators to include multifaceted pedagogical approaches across the curriculum.

To ensure the profession’s social responsibility to combat racism, innovative and deliberate social work using anti-racism practice tools (Bent-Goodley, 2001; Gilbert, Harvey, & Belgrave, 2009; Ladson-Billings, 2000b; National Association of Social Workers, 2007; Chisom & Washington, 1997) are needed.

The urgency to tackle racism through academic curricula and Council on Social Work Education practice standards (Clark et al., 2006; Council on Social Work Education, 2008; National Association of Social Workers, 2007) necessitates the inclusion of conventional models of education and practices grounded in African-centered pedagogies. There is opportunity for the social work profession to promote positive images and historical narratives of women (from Harriet A. Jacobs [1813–1897], to U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama)—children (Celia, a slave [1836–1855] to Thessalonika Arzu Embry)—and men (from astronomer-scientist Benjamin Banneker [1731–1806] to U.S. President Barack Obama). Effective examples are occurring at micro, messo, and macro levels (e.g., President Obama’s Race and Beyond: Moving Forward with “My Brother’s Keeper” initiative; NASW social work pioneers). Contemporary examples are also documented in descendants of African ancestry who are prominent academics in varying disciplines—black studies, English, fine arts, history, social work, sociology, and teacher education (Rodgers & Cudjoe, 2013) and community leaders JWT (J. Walter Thompson) Differenter/Innovators of Change (Thacker, 2015)

On the macro level, reform is needed in federal and state systems, and a change in language, one that does not dehumanize persons. This article reinforces themes, which are aligned with the 2014 Social Work Month theme, “All People Matter” and the profession’s value of respect for the dignity and worth of the person. Moreover, discussions central to eradicating racism must transcend conversations outlined in United Nations post-2015 agenda. Social work proposed by scholars (DeGruy, 2005; Franklin et al., 2006; Whitaker, Weismiller, & Clark, 2006) assert the need for critical approaches, which include a shift from an invisibility syndrome to social responsibility, a balance of power in institutions, and actionable social policies that acknowledge grievous injustice, uphold the promise of “forty acres and a mule” (Darity, 2008), and confront racial exclusion.

In looking forward, the realities of racism endured by blacks in the United States and globally will not be resolved solely by the efforts of social workers at individual, mid-level, or macro-structural conversations. Instead, a collective revolutionary action of blacks, dedicated social workers, and like-minded individuals will be rallied through intellectual protests which include authentic historical phenomena (chants, dye-ins, marches) infused into pedagogy, educational core competencies, culturally competent practice, community organizing, policy reform, and grassroots social activism.


  • Abu-Jamal, M. (2004). Haitian struggle for freedom. In P. Chin, G. Dunkel, S. Flounders, & K. Ives, (Eds.), Haiti: A slave revolution 200 years after 1804 (pp. 195–203). New York: International Action Center.
  • Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 42 U.S.C. 628 (1980).
  • Ajose, F. O. A. (2005). Consequences of skin bleaching in Nigerian men and women. International Journal of Dermatology, 44, 41–43.
  • Akbar, N. (1996). Breaking the chains of psychological slavery. Tallahassee, FL: Mind Productions & Associates.
  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: New Press.
  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anderson, M. J. (1988). The American Census: A social history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Anderson, M. J. (2002). Counting by race: The Antebellum legacy. In P. Joel & C. M. Waters, (Eds.), The new race question: How the census counts multiracial individuals (pp. 227–255). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Ani, M. (1994). Yurugu: An African-centered critique of European cultural thought and behavior. Trenton, NJ: African World Press.
  • Appliah, K. A., & Gates, H. L., Jr. (Eds.). (2003). Africana: The concise desk reference (2d ed.). Philadelphia: Running Press.
  • Asante, M. K., & Asante, K. W. (1985). African culture: The rhythms of unity. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Barden, K. P. (2013). Remember the cultural trauma legacies of slavery: African American young adult perceptions on racism, ethnic identity, and racial socialization (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Loyola University, Chicago.
  • Barker, R. L. (2003). The social work dictionary (5th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • Beauchamp, K. A. (Prod. & Dir.) (2005). The untold story of Emmett Louis Till. New York: Thinkfilm. Motion picture documentary.
  • Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2001). Eradicating domestic violence in the African American community: A literature review and action agenda. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse: A Review Journal, 2, 316–330.
  • Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2007). Health disparities and violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(2), 90–104.
  • Bent-Goodley, T., St. Vil, N., & Rodgers, S. T. (2012a). African Americans. In J. L. Postmus (Ed.), Sexual violence and abuse: An encyclopedia of prevention, impacts, and recovery (pp. 13–18). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  • Bent-Goodley, T., St. Vil, N., & Rodgers, S. T. (2012b). Racism. In J. L. Postmus (Ed.), Sexual violence and abuse: An encyclopedia of prevention, impacts, and recovery (pp. 445–447). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  • Bent-Goodley, T. B., Chase, L., Rodgers, S. T., & Circo, E. A. (2010). Our survival, our strengths: Understanding the experiences of African-American women in abusive relationships. In L. Lockhart & F. Danis (Eds.), Domestic violence: Intersectionality and culturally competent practice (pp. 67–99). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Berry, D. C. (Prod.), Berry D. C., & Duke, B. (Dirs.). (2011). Dark girls. Los Angeles: Urban Winter Entertainment. Motion picture documentary
  • Blackmon, D. A. (2008). Slavery by another name: The re-enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II. New York: Anchor.
  • Blay, Y. A. (2007). Yellow fever: Skin bleaching and the politics of skin color in Ghana (Ph.D. dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia.
  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). “New Racism,” color-blind racism, and the future of whiteness in America. In A. W. Doane & E. Bonilla-Silva (Eds.), White out: The continuing significance of racism. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2013). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (4th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Boyd-Franklin, N. (1989). Black families in therapy: A multisystems approach. New York: Guilford.
  • Boyd-Franklin, N. (2003). Black families in therapy: Understanding the African American experience (2d ed.). New York: Guilford.
  • Boyd-Franklin, N., Franklin, A. J., & Toussaint, P. (2001). Boys into men: Raising our African American teenage sons. New York: Plume.
  • Boykins, A. D., Alvanzo, A., Carson, S., Forte, J., Leisey, M., & Plichta, S. B. (2010). Minority women victims of recent sexual violence: Disparities in incident history. Journal of Women’s Health, 19, 453–661.
  • Brave Heart, M. Y. H. (2003). The historical trauma response among Natives and its relationship with substance abuse: A Lakota illustration. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 35, 7–13.
  • Brave Heart, M. Y. H. (2007). The impact of historical trauma: The examples of the Native community. In M. Bussey & J. B. Wise (Eds.), Trauma transformed: An empowerment response (Empowering the powerless: A social work series) (pp. 174–193). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Brandt, A. M. (2000). Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. In Susan M. Reverby (Ed.), Tuskegee’s truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphillis Study (p. 16). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Criminal offender statistics. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
  • Carlezon, W. A., Jr., Mague, S. D., & Andersen, S. L. (2003). Enduring behavioral effects of early exposure to methylphendiate in rats. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 1330–1337.
  • Carmichael, S. (Kwame Touré), & Hamilton, C. (1967). Black power: The politics of liberation in America. New York: Random House.
  • Carter, R. T., & Forsyth, J. M. (2009). A guide to the forensic assessment of race-based traumatic stress reactions. Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(1), 28–40.
  • Cashmore, E., & Jennings, J. (Eds.). (2001). Racism: Essential reading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Center for American Progress. (2012). The top 5 facts about women in our criminal justice system. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Retrieved from:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011a). Health Disparities and Inequalities Report—United States, 2011. MMWR 2011; 60 (Suppl.), 1–114.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2011b). Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS) [online]. Retrieved at:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey 2010 summary report. United States, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved at:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Summary health statistics for U.S. Children: National health interview survey 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved at:
  • Charles, C. A. D. (2009). Skin bleachers’ representation of skin color in Jamaica. Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 153–170.
  • Chisom, R., & Washington, M. (1997). Undoing racism: A philosophy of international social change. New Orleans: People’s Institute.
  • Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Reading in social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Clark, E. J., Weismiller, T., Whitaker, T., Waller, G. W., Zlotnik, J. L., Corbett, B. (Eds.). (2006). 2005 Social Work Congress-Final report. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • Closson, R. (2010). Critical Race Theory and adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(3), 261–283.
  • Coleman, S. (2011). Addressing the puzzle of race. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(1), 91–108.
  • Coon, C. S. (1968). The origin of races. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Cooper, F. R. (2011). Hyper-incarceration as a multidimensional attack: Replying to Angela Harris through the wire. Journal of Law & Policy, 37(67), 67–88.
  • Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2008). Council on social work education curriculum policy statements. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
  • Crais, C., & Scully, P. (2010). Sara Baartman and the Hottentot Venus: A ghost story and a biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Crawford, J., Nobles, W. W., & Leary, J. D. (2003). Reparations and health care for African Americans: Repairing the damage from the legacy of slavery. In R. A. Winbush (Ed.), Should America pay? Slavery and the raging debate on reparations (pp. 251–281). New York: Harper Collins.
  • Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (1995). Critical Race Theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: New Press.
  • Culbreth, D. (2006). Employment discrimination in the 21st century: An empirical investigation of the presence of intraracial colorism among Black Americans in the workplace. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(07), 164A. (UMI No.3226798)
  • Danticat, E. (2004). No greater shame. In P. Chin, G. Dunkel, S. Flounders, & K. Ives (Eds.), Haiti: A slave revolution 200 years after 1804 (pp. 165–172). New York: International Action Center.
  • Darity, W., Jr. (2008). Forty Acres and a Mule in the 21st Century. Social Science Quarterly, 89(3), 656–664.
  • Davis, K. L. (Dir.). (2005). A girl like me. New York: Real works teen filmmaking. Retreived from: Film.
  • Davis, K. & Jung, H. (2013). Disparities and Inequalities. In C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work Online (ESWO) (21st ed.). NASW Press and Oxford University Press, Inc.
  • DeGruy, J. (2005). Post traumatic slave syndrome: America’s legacy of enduring injury and healing. Milwaukie, OR: Uptone.
  • Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical Race Theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  • DeVeaux, M. (2013). The trauma of the incarceration experience. The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 48, 258–277.
  • Diop, C. A. (1974). The African origin of civilization: Myth or reality. Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill.
  • Diop, C. A. (1978). The cultural unity of Black Africa. Chicago: Third World.
  • Diop, C. A. (1989). Origins of the Ancient Egyptians. Journal of African Civilizations, 10, 9–37.
  • Diop, C. A. (1991). Civilization or barbarism. Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill.
  • Doane, A. (2003). Rethinking whiteness studies. In A. Doane and E. Bonilla-Silva (Eds.), White out: The continuing significance of racism (pp. 3–18). New York: Routledge.
  • Doane, A. (2006). What is racism? Racial discourse and racial politics. Critical Sociology, 32(2/3), 255–274.
  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1935). Black reconstruction in America, 1860–1880. New York: Russell & Russell.
  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1996). Urban life, The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Project Muse. Retrieved from: Originally published in 1899.
  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1999). The Souls of Black Folk. In Henry Louis Gates and Terri Hume Oliver (Eds.). New York: W. W. Norton. Originally published in 1903.
  • DuBois, B., & Miley, K. K. (2014). Social work: An empowering profession (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Estrada, A. L. (2009). Mexican American and historical trauma theory: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 8, 330–340.
  • Evans-Campbell, T. (2008). Historical trauma in American Indian/Native Alaska communities: A multilevel framework for exploring impacts on individuals, families, and communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 316–338.
  • Eyerman, R. (2001). Culturaly trauma: Slavery and the formation of African American identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
  • Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks. Charles Lam Markmann (Trans.). New York: Grove. Originally published in 1952.
  • Feagin, J. (2014). Racist America: Roots, current realities, and future reparations (3d ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Fong, R., McRoy, R., & Dettlaff, A. (2014). Disproportionality and disparities. In C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work Online (ESWO) (21st ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press and Oxford University Press.
  • Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 §42 U.S.C. §1305 (2008).
  • Franklin, A. J., & Boyd-Franklin, N. (2000). Invisibility syndrome: A clinical model of the effects of racism on African-American males. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 33–41.
  • Franklin, A. J., Boyd-Franklin, N., & Kelly, S. (2006). Racism and invisibility: Race-related stress, emotional abuse and psychological trauma for people of color. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 6(2/3), 9–30.
  • Franklin, J. H., & Higginbotham, E. B. (2011). From slavery to freedom: A history of African Americans (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  • Fredrickson, G. (2002). Racism: A short history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Fredrickson, G. (2005). Mulattoes and métis: Attitudues toward miscegenaiton in the United States and France since the seventeenth century. International Science Journal, 57, 103–112.
  • Gage, J. P. (2009). Letters: A slave name Gordon. New York Times. (30 September). Retrieved from:
  • Gamble, V. N. (November/December 1993). A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 9, 35–38.
  • Gamble, V. N. (1997). Under the shawdow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 87(11), 1773–1778.
  • Gamble, V. N. (1999). Teaching about race and racism in medical history. Radical History Review, 74(140), 140–161.
  • Gates, H. L., Jr. (Ed.). (1987). Classic slave narratives. New York: Penguin.
  • Gee, G. C., Walsemann, K. M., & Brondolo, E. (2012). The science of research on racial/ethnic discrimination and health: A life course perspective on how racism may be related to health inequities. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 967–974.
  • Gibson, P. A. (2014). Extending the ally model of social justice to social work pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34, 199–214.
  • Gibson, P. A., & Singh, S. (2010). Let’s help caregivers and children in informal kinship care: Defacto custodian legislation. Child Welfare, 89(3), 79–97.
  • Gilbert, D. J., Harvey, A. R., & Belgrave, F. Z. (2009). Advancing the Africentric paradigm shift discourse: Building toward evidence-based Africentric intervention in social work practice with African Americans. Social Work, 54(2) 243–252.
  • Gray-White, D. (1999). Ar’n’t I a woman?: Female slaves in the plantation south. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Griffith, D., Johnson, J., Ellis, K., & Schulz, A. (2010). Cultural context and a critical approach to eliminating health disparities. Ethnicity & Disease, 20, 71–76.
  • Griffin, K. A., Pifer, M. J., Humphrey, J. R., Hazelwood, A. M. (2011). (Re)Defining departure: Exploring Black professors’ experiences with and responses to racism and racial climate. American Journal of Education, 117(4), 495–526.
  • Guerino, P. M., Harrison, P. M., & Sabol, W. J. (2011). Bureau of Justice Statistics. Prisoners in 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Guerino, P., Harrison, P. M., & Sabol, W. J. (2012). Prisoners in 2010 (NCJ 236096).Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  • Haller, J. S. (1971). Outcasts from evolution. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • Heller, J. (July 26, 1972). Syphilis victims in U.S. study went untreated for 40 years. New York Times.
  • Herring, C., Keith, V., & Horton, H. (Eds.). (2004). Skin deep: How race and complexion matter in the “color-blind” era. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • Hicken, M. T., Gee, G. G., Morenoff, J., Connell, C. M., Snow, R. C., & Hu, H. (2012). A novel look at racial health disparities: The interaction between social disadvantage and environmental health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2344–2351.
  • Hickling, F. W., & Huchinson, G. (2000). Post-colonialism and mental health: Understanding the roast breadfruit. Psychiatric Bulletin, 24, 94–95.
  • Hill, R. (1977). Informal adoption among Black families. Washington, DC: National Urban League Research Department.
  • Hill, R. B. (2007). An analysis of racial/ethnic disproportionatlity and disparity at the national, state, and country levels. Washington, DC: Casey-CSSP Alliance for Racial Equity in Child Welfare.
  • Hirschman, C. (2004). The origins and demise of the concept of race. Population and Development Review, 30(3), 385–415.
  • Hochschild, J. L., & Powell, B. M. (2008). Racial reorganization and the United States Census 1850–1930: Mulattoes, half- breeds, mixed parentage, Hindoos, and the Mexican race. Studies in American Political Development, 22, 59–96.
  • Hodges, V. G. (2001). Historical development of African American child welfare services. In I. B. Carlton-LaNey (Ed.), African American leadership: An empowerment in social welfare history (pp. 203–213). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End.
  • Horton, J. O., & Horton, L. E. (2005). Slavery and the making of America. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hoyt, C. (2012). The pedagogy of the meaning of racism: Reconciling a discordant discourse. Social Work, 57(3), 225–234.
  • Hughes, M., & Hertel, B. R. (1990). The significance of color remains: A study of life chances, mate selection, and ethnic consciousness among Black Americans. Social Forces, 68, 1105–1120.
  • Hunter, M. L. (2002). “If you’re light you’re alright”: Light skin color as social capital for women of color. Gender and Society, 16, 175–193.
  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2002) Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Jacobs, H. (2001). Incidents in the life of a slave girl. New York: Dover.
  • Jackson, J. P., & Weidman, N. M. (2004). Race, racism, and science: Social impact and interaction. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  • Johnson, W. (2001). Soul by soul: Life inside the antebellum slave market. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jones, J. M. (1997). Prejudice and racism (2d ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Kerr, A. E. (2005). The paper bag principle: Of the myth and the motion of colorism. Journal of American Folklore, 118(469), 271–289. Retrieved from:
  • King, J. (1981). The biology of race. Los Angeles: University of California Press, p. 118.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2000a). Brazil, South Africa, the United States: Beyond racism. Atlanta, GA: Comparative Human Relations Initiative, the Southern Education Foundation.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2000b). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2d ed., pp. 257–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Levitan, M. (2005). Out of school, out of work . . . out of luck? New York City’s disconnected youth. New York: Community Service Society of New York.
  • Levitan, M. (2007). Unemployment and joblessness in New York City, 2006: Recovery bypasses youth. New York: Community Service Society of New York.
  • Lewis, L. M., Robkin, N., Gaska, K., & Njoki, L. C. (2011). Investigating motivations for women’s skin bleaching in Tanzania. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 29–37.
  • Loya, M. A. & Cuevas, M. (2010). Teaching racism: Using experiential learning to challenge the status quo. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30, 288–299.
  • Lum, L. (2009). The Obama era: A post-racial society? Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 25(26), 14–16.
  • Ly, F. (2007). Aesthetic problems associated with the cosmetic use of bleaching products. International Journal of Dermatology, 46, 15–17.
  • Martin, E. P., & Martin, J. M. (2002). Spirituality and the Black helping tradition in social work. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • Martensen, K. (2012). The price that U.S. minority communities pay: Mass incarceration and the ideologies that fuel them. Contemporary Justice Review, 15(2), 211–222.
  • McLaurin, M. (2012). Celia, a Slave. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  • Monroe, C. R. (January/February 2013). Colorizing educational research: African American life and schooling as an exemplar. Educational Research, 42(1), 9–19.
  • Morrison, T. (1970). The bluest eye. New York: Plume.
  • Muhammad, K. G. (2010). The condemnation of blackness: Race, crime, and the making of modern urban America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • National Association of Black Social Workers. (1972). NABSW position statement on trans-racial adoptions. Retrieved at:
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2006). Racism. In Social work speaks: National Association of Social Workers Policy Statements 2006–2009 (7th ed., pp. 305–315). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2007). Institutional racism & the social work profession: A call to action (pp. 1–33). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • National Association of Social Workers. (2009). Racism. In Social work speaks: National Association of Social Workers policy statement, 2009–2012 (8th ed., pp. 281–291). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • National Institutes on Drug and Abuse (NIDA). (2008). NIH research suggest stimulant treatment for ADHD does not contribute substance abuse later in life. Retrieved from:
  • Nobles, M. (2000). History counts: A comparative analysis of racial/color catergorization in the US and Brazilian Census. American Journal of Public Health, 90(11), 1738–1745.
  • Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States (2d ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Owen, D. S. (2007). Towards a critica theory of whiteness. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33, 203–222.
  • Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009). The changing racial and ethnic composition of the U.S. population: Emerging American identifies. Population and Development Review, 35(1), 1–51.
  • Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004). Mass imprisionment and the life course: Race and class inequality in the U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 151–169.
  • Pew Center on the States. (March 2009). One in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
  • Picca, L. H., & Feagin, J. (2007). Two faced racism: Whites in the backstage and frontstage. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
  • Pierce, C. M. (1970). Offensive mechanisms. In F. Barbour (Ed.), The Black 70’s (pp. 265–282). Boston: Porter Sargent.
  • Pollard, W. L. (June 2013). Civil Rights. In C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work Online (ESWO) (21st ed.). NASW Press and Oxford University Press.
  • Pouissaint, A. F., & Alexander, A. (2000). Lay my burden down. Boston: Beacon.
  • Rastogi, S., Johnson, T. D., Hoeffel, E. M., & Drewery, M. P. (Eds.). (2011). The Black Population: 2010 Census Briefs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from:
  • Reichmann, R. (May/June 1995). “Brazil’s denial of race.” Report on Brazil, 27(6), 35–36.
  • Reverby, S. M. (2000). Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. In Susan M. Reverby (Ed.), Tuskegee’s truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphillis Study (p. 559). Chapel Hill: Univeristy of North Carolina Press.
  • Rivera, A. (2009). Rules and fires: Metamorphosis of racism. Los Angeles: Daedalus.
  • Roberts, D. (1998). Killing the Black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage.
  • Roberts, D. (2002). Shattered bonds: The color of child welfare. New York: Basic Civitas.
  • Robinson, P. A. (2013). Colorism and skin bleaching in Jamaica: Global implications for communities of color and urban classrooms. National Journal of Urban Education and Practice, 6(3), 29–40.
  • Robinson, C. R., Battle, R., & Robinson E. W., Jr. (1987). (Eds.). The Journey of the Songhai People (2d ed.). Philadelphia: Farmer.
  • Rockeymoore, M. (2002). African Americans confront a pandemic: Assessing community impact, organization and advocacy in the second decade of AIDS. In L. A. Daniels (Ed.), The state of Black America 2002 (pp. 123–146). New York: National Urban League.
  • Rodgers, S. T. (2006). The art of healing: An Afrocentric helping guide for practitioners working with African-American families who experience intimate partner violence. In R. L. Hampton and T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Interpersonal violence in the African-American community: Evidence-based prevention and treatment practices (pp. 121–147). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Rodgers, S. T. (September 26, 2013). Ensuring Black women are [a]part of the global agenda: Perceptions of posttraumatic growth in the aftermath of historical and contemporary trauma. The National Association of Social Workers—South Africa, in association with the International Federation for Social Workers Voices for Development Conference. Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Rodgers, S. T. (2011). From childhood sexual abuse to spiritual well-being: In all ways a survivor. In L. Rodgers-Rose and Z. Zai’mah (Eds.), Healing Black women from violence: Reclamation and peace (pp. 45–58). Conference Volume Book Chapter. Norfolk, VA: Trace Publications.
  • Rodgers, S. T. (September 2014). Global social work is on the move. York College Academic Affairs Update Newsletter, 8(5), 16.
  • Rodgers, S. T. (May 2014). Weaving a tapestry of dignity and worth. York College Academic Affairs Update Newsletter, 8(4), 13.
  • Rodgers, S. T., & Cudjoe, T. (2013). Images of Black leadership and mentoring in higher education: Personal narratives from faculty and staff. Journal of Research Initiatives, 1(1), 1–12.
  • Rule, S. R. & Rule, M. R. (2010). The hard journey home: Real life stories about reentering society after incarceration. New York: Resilience Multimedia.
  • Sakamoto, I., Anastas, J. W., McPhail, B., & Colarossi, L. (2008). Current status of women in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(1), 37–62.
  • Schiele, J. H. (2007). Implications of the equality-of-oppressions paradigm for curriculim content on people of color. Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 83–100.
  • Schor, P. (2005). Mobilising for pure prestige? Challenging federal census ethnic categories in the USA (1850–1940). UNESCO, 89–101.
  • Shariff-Marco, S., Klassen, A. C., Bowie, J. V. (2010). Racial/Ethnic differences in self-reported racism and its association with cancer-related health behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 364–374.
  • Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown.
  • Smedley, B. D. (2012). The lived experience of race and its health consequences. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 933–935.
  • Smedley, A., & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real. American Psychologist, 60, 16–26.
  • Smith, W. (2011). Hole in the head: A life revealed. Altadena, CA: Uplift Productions.
  • Smith, V. J., Stewart, T. L., Myers, A. C., & Latu, L. M. (2008). Implicit coping responses to racism predict African American’s level of psychological distress. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 264–277.
  • Snipp, M. C. (2003). Racial measurement in the American census: Past practices and implications for the future. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 563–588.
  • Solórzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical Race Theory, Racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(12), 60–73.
  • Solórzano, D., & Yosso, T. (2001). Critical race and LatCrit theory as method: Counterstorytelling Chicana and Chicano graduate school experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 471–495.
  • Spencer, M. (2008). A social worker’s reflections on power, privilege, and oppression. Social Work, 53(2), 1–4.
  • Spitzer, E. (1999). The New York City Police Department’s “stop and frisk” practices: A report to people of the state of New York from the Office of the Attorney General. Albany: New York State Office of the Attorney General.
  • Staples, R. (2011). White power, Black crime, and racial politics. Black Scholar, 41(4): 31–41.
  • State Plan for Foster Care and Adoption Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 671(a) (19) (1996).
  • Sue, D., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C, Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286.
  • Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2012. Available at:
  • Tarman, C., & Sears, D. O. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of symbolic racism. Journal of Politics, 67, 731–761.
  • Taylor, T. R., Williams, C. D., Makambi, . . . Adams-Campbell, L. L. (2007). Racial discrimination and breast cancer incidence in US Black women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166(1), 46–54.
  • Telles, E. E. (2004). Race in another America: The significance of skin color in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Thacker, K. (2015). Differenter/Innovators of Change Black History series featuring Dr. Selena T. Rodgers [Documentary Expert]. New York: J. Walter Thompson.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). 1790 Overview. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from:
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). Statistical abstract of the United States; 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Breast cancer rates by race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from:
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical abstract of the United States; 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010. In With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health (2d ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. (2011). Child maltreatment 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from:
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2010). AFCARS Report #18. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). HHS action plan to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities: A nation free of disparities in health and health care. Retrieved from:
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, & Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2012). The AFCARS report: Preliminary FY 2012 estimates as of July 2013 # 20. Retrieved from:
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (July 2008). African American children in foster care: Additional HHS assistance needed to help states reduce the proportion in care. GAO-08-1064T. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from:
  • United States Environmental Protection agency. (2014). Children’s environmental health disparities: Black and African American children and Asthma fact sheet. Retrieved from:
  • Valandra, V. (Summer 2007). Reclaiming their lives and breaking free: An afrocentric approach to recovery from prostitution. Affilia: Journal of Women, 22, 195–208.
  • Van Sluytman, L. G. (2013). Microaggressions. In C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work Online (ESWO) (21st ed.). NASW Press and Oxford University Press.
  • Wacquant, L. (2010). Class, race and hyperincaraceration in revanchist America. Dædalus, 139(3), 74–90.
  • Washington, H. A. (2006). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. New York: Doubleday.
  • Watkins, B. (2009). Black American money: How black power can thrive in a capitalist society. Camillus, NY: Blue Boy.
  • Watt, S. K. (2007). Difficult dialogues, privilege and social justice: Uses of the privileged identity exploration (PIE) model in student affairs practice. College Student Affairs Journal, 25, 114–125.
  • Whitaker, T., Weismiller, T., & Clark, E. (2006). Assuring the sufficiency of a frontline workforce: A national study of licensed social workers. Executive summary. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
  • White, G., Jr. (2005). Holding the line: Race, racism, and American foreign policy toward Africa, 1953–1961. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Wise, T. (2005). White like me: Reflections on race from a privileged son. New York: Soft Skull.
  • Wise, L. A., Palmer, J. R., Rothman, E. F., & Rosenberg, L. (2009). Childhood abuse and early menarche: Findings from the Black Women’s Health Study. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1–7.
  • Wilkerson, I. (2010). The warmth of other suns: The epic story of America’s great migration. New York: Random House.
  • Williams, C. (1987). The destruction of Black civilization: Great issues of a race from 4500 B.C. to 2000 A. D. Chicago: Third World.
  • Williams, T. M. (2008). Black pain: It just looks like we’re not hurting. New York: Scribner’s.
  • Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 20–47.
  • Williams, D. R., & Neighbors, H. (2001). Racism, discrimination, and hypertension: Evidence and needed research. Ethnicity & Disease, 11, 800–816.
  • Williams, D. R., & Williams-Morris, R. (2000). Racism and mental health: The African American experience. Ethnicity & Health, 5(3/4), 243–268.
  • Williams-Washington, K. N. (2010). Historical trauma. In R. L. Hampton, T. P. Gullotta, and R. L. Crowel (Eds.), Handbook for African American Health (pp. 31–50). New York: Gilford.
  • Winant, H. (2000). Race and race theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 169–185.
  • World Health Organization (2014). Eliminating forced, coercive and otherwise involuntary sterilization: An interagency statement, OHCHR, UN Women, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and WHO. Retrieved from:
  • Yamato, G. (2004). Something About the Subject Makes it Hard to Name. In M. L. Anderson, & P. Hill Collins (Eds.), Race, class, and gender (5th ed., pp. 99–103). New York: Thomson/Wadsworth.
  • Young, W., Jr. (1969). Beyond racism: Building an open society. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Suggested Readings

  • Clarke, J. H. (1992). Christopher Columbus and the Afrikan Holocaust: Slavery and the rise of European capitalism. New York: A & B.
  • Gates, L. H., Jr., & Appiah, K. A. (1999). Africana: The encyclopedia of the African and African-American Experience. New York: Basic Civitas.
  • Giddings, P. (1996). When and Where I Enter: The impact of Black women on race and sex in America. New York: William Morrow.
  • Nasheed, T. (Dir.). (2011). Hidden colors: The untold history of people of aboriginal, moor and African decent. [Documentary]. Beverly Hills, CA: King Flex Entertainment, Inc.
  • Nasheed, T. (Dir.). (2012). Hidden colors 2: The triumph of melanin. [Documentary]. United States: King Flex Entertainment, Inc.
  • Nasheed, T. (Dir.). (2014). Hidden colors 3: The rules of racism. [Documentary]. Beverly Hills, CA: King Flex Entertainment.
  • Washington, B. T. (1969). Up from slavery. New York: Doubleday. Originally published in 1901.
  • Washington, J. M. (1992). I have a dream: Writings & speeches that changed the world. New York: HarperOne.
  • Wells-Bernett, I. B. (2005). Southern horrors: Lynch law in all its phases. The Project Gutenberg Ebook. New York: New York Age. Retrieved from: Originally published in 1892.
  • West, C. (1994). Race matters. New York: Vintage.
  • Wilson, A. N. (2000). Blueprint for Black power: A moral, political and economic imperative for the twenty-first century. New York: Afrikan World Infosystems.
  • Woodson, C. G. (1969). Mis-Education of the Negro. Washington, DC: Associated Publishers.